General Interest: Funds of Feeling: a Feeling-Based approach to Literary Interpretation

References

1. Au Wayne. “High-Stakes Testing and Discursive Control: The Triple Bind for Non-standard Student Identities.” Multicultural Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 2 2009, pp. 65–71.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beach Richard. “Critical Issues: Reading and Responding to Literature at the Level of Activity.” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 32, no. 2 2000, pp. 237–51.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clore Gerald L., et al. “Affect and Cognition: Three Principles.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol. 19 2018, pp. 78–82.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Esteban-Guitart Moises, and MollLuis C.. “Funds of Identity: A New Concept Based on the Funds of Knowledge Approach.” Culture and Psychology, vol. 20, no. 1 2014, pp. 31–48.
   [Google Scholar]
5. González Norma, et al editors Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. Erlbaum 2005.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hogan Patrick C. Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. U of Nebraska P 2011.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hurston Zora Neale. Their Eyes Were Watching God. Harper Perennial Modern Classics 2006.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Juzwik Mary M., et al. Inspiring Dialogue: Talking to Learn in the English Classroom. Teachers College Press 2013.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lee Carol D. Culture, Literacy, and Learning: Taking Bloom in the Midst of the Whirlwind. Teachers College Press 2007.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Levine Sarah. “Making Interpretation Visible with an Affect-Based Strategy.” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3 2014, pp. 283–303.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Levine Sarah. “Using Everyday Language to Support Students in Constructing Thematic Interpretations.” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1 2018, pp. 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Levine Sarah, and Horton William S.. “Helping High School Students Read Like Experts: Affective Evaluation, Salience, and Literary Interpretation.” Cognition and Instruction, vol. 33, no. 2, Apr 2015, pp. 125–53.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Levine Sarah, et al. “How Feeling Supports Students’ Interpretive Discussions about Literature.” Journal of Literacy Research, vol. 53, no. 4, Dec 2021, pp. 491–515.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Miall David S., and Kuiken Don. “Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect: Response to Literary Stories.” Poetics, vol. 22, no. 5 1994, pp. 389–407.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Morrison Toni. “Toni Morrison: The Art of Fiction No. 134” Interview conducted by Schappell Elissa and Brodsky Lacour Claudia. The Paris Review, 1993, www.theparisreview.org/interviews/1888/the-art-of-fiction-no-134-toni-morrison.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Moya Paula L. The Social Imperative: Race, Close Reading, and Contemporary Literary Criticism. Stanford UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nasir Na’ilah Suad, et al. “Learning as a Cultural Process: Achieving Equity through Diversity.” The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by Sawyer R. Keith, Cambridge UP 2006, pp. 489–504.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nystrand Martin. “Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 40, no. 4 2006, pp. 392–412.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Powers Richard. Prisoner’s Dilemma. HarperCollins 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Rios Cati V. de los, et al. “Upending Colonial Practices: Toward Repairing Harm in English Education.” Theory Into Practice, vol. 58, no. 4 2019, pp. 359–67.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rosenblatt Louise. “The Transactional Theory: Against Dualisms.” College English, vol. 55, no. 4 1993, pp. 377–86.
    [Google Scholar]