Skip to content
2018
Volume 55, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0007-8204
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2216

Abstract

Various English educators consider what the advent of “intelligent” technology means for ELA education and the ongoing pursuit of equity and justice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ee202332555
2023-04-01
2024-02-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ee/55/3/englisheducation32555.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/ee202332555&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hobbs R., Chapman D., Doerr-Stevens C. M., French S. D., Lynch T. L., Medina C., Morrell E., Sloan C., Stringfellow L., & Ziemke K. (2022) Media education in English language arts. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/statement/media_education/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. National Council of Teachers of English (1995) Resolution on electronic online services. https://ncte.org/statement/onlineservices/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Veenema S. (2001, December 19). Multimedia and multiple intelligences. The American Prospect. https://prospect.org/education/multimedia-multiple-intelligences/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Crawford C [@katecrawford]. (2023, April 4). ChatGPT strikes again. A journalist contacted me to research her profile on @lexfridman. ChatGPT informed her that @_KarenHao and I [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/katecrawford/status/1643323086450700288
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garcia A., & Mirra N. (Eds) (2023) Speculative pedagogies: Designing equitable educational futures. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geckler J. (2023, February 14). Some teachers embrace ChatGPT as a new teaching tool. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/some-educators-embrace-chatgpt-as-a-new-teaching-tool
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Herman D. (2022, December 9). The end of high-school English. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high-school-english-essay/672412/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Krutka D. G., & Heath M. K. (2023, April 2). Asking technoskeptical questions about ChatGPT. Civics of Technology. https://www.civicsoftechnology.org/blog/asking-technoskeptical-questions-about-chatgtp
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mah C., & Levine S. (2023, February 19). How to use ChatGPT as an example machine. Cult of Pedagogy. https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/chatgpt-example-machine/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McCorkle B., & Palmeri J. (2016) Lessons from history: Teaching with technology in 100 years of English Journal. English Journal, 105(6), 18–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Metz C. (2023, March 29). What makes A.I. chatbots go wrong? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/29/technology/ai-chatbots-hallucinations.html
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Noble S. U. (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Robinson B. (2023) Speculative propositions for digital writing under the new autonomous model of literacy. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 117–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Selwyn N. (2022) The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 620–631.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Skerrett A., & Bomer R. (2011) Borderzones in adolescents’ literacy practices: Connecting out-of-school literacies to the reading curriculum. Urban Education, 46(6), 1256–1279.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zuboff S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elbow P. (1981) Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Behizadeh N. (2014) Adolescent perspectives on authentic writing. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(1), 27–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Waters M. B. (Host) with Myers A. (2023, February 27). ChatGPT in English class: Using AI writers as thinking partners (No. 23) [Audio podcast episode]. In reThinkELA. https://www.rethinkela.com/2023/02/chatgpt-in-english-class-using-ai-writers-as-thinking-partners/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Anderson T., & Guyas A. S. (2012) Earth education, interbeing, and deep ecology. Studies in Art Education, 53(3), 223–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Beach R., Share J., & Webb A. (2017) Teaching climate change to adolescents: Reading, writing, and making a difference. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bridle J. (2023) Ways of being: Animals, plants, machines: The search for a planetary intelligence. Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Coulter M. (2023, May 8). AI pioneer says its threat to world may be “more urgent” than climate change. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/ai-pioneer-says-its-threat-world-may-be-more-urgent-than-climate-change-2023-05-05/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia A., & Mirra N. (2023) Other suns: Designing for racial equity through speculative education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(1), 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Higuera D. B. (2021) The last cuentista. Levine Querido.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Keltner D. (2023) Awe: The new science of everyday wonder and how it can transform your life. Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. López A. (2020) Ecomedia literacy: Integrating ecology into media education. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marr B. (2023, March 22). Green intelligence: Why data and AI must become more sustainable. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/03/22/green-intelligence-why-data-and-ai-must-become-more-sustainable/?sh=243b36857658
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Paul A. M. (2021) The extended mind: The power of thinking outside the brain. Mariner Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Benjamin R. (2022) Viral justice: How we grow the world we want. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. hooks b. (1994) Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lyiscott J., Green K. L., Ohito E. O., & Coles J. A. (2021) Call us by our names: A kitchen-table dialogue on doin’ it for the culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ohito E. O. (2020) “The creative aspect woke me up”: Awakening to multimodal essay composition as a fugitive literacy practice. English Education, 52(3), 186–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Simonite T. (2020, December 8). Behind the paper that led to a Google researcher’s firing. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/behind-paper-led-google-researchers-firing/
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hicks T., Young C. A., Kajder S., & Hunt B. (2012) Same as it ever was: Enacting the promise of teaching, writing, and new media. English Journal, 101(3), 68–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hunt T. J., & Hunt B. (2006) Whose grammar for what purposes? English Journal, 95(5), 88–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WGA Negotiating Committee (2023, May 1). WGA on strike. Writers Guild of America. https://www.wgacontract2023.org/announcements/wga-on-strike
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Achinstein B., & Ogawa R. (2006) (In)Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Adler-Kassner L., Baca I., & Fredricksen J. (2018) Understanding and teaching writing: Guiding principles. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/statement/teachingcomposition/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Applebee A., & Langer J. (2009) What is happening in the teaching of writing? English Journal, 98(5), 18–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Calhoon-Dillahunt C., Coppola S., Warrington A., & Yageleski R.P. (2022) Position statement on writing instruction in school. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/statement/statement-on-writing-instruction-in-school/
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Crouse M. (2023, May 25). ChatGPT cheat sheet: Complete guide for 2023. TechRepublic. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/chatgpt-cheat-sheet/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Horn M. B., & Curtis D. (2023, March 22). To teach better writing, don’t ban artificial intelligence. Instead, embrace it. Education Next. https://www.education next.org/teach-better-writing-dont-ban-artificial-intelligence-instead-embrace-it-inviting-chatgpt-into-classroom/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges (2004) Writing: A ticket to work…or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. College Board.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scott T. (2008) “Happy to comply”: Writing assessment, fast-capitalism, and the cultural logic of control. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 30(2), 140–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stillman J. (2011) Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gee J. (2007) Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hobbs R. (2019) Meditation: Ethical practice. In Turner K. H. (Ed.), The ethics of digital literacy: Developing knowledge and skills across grade levels (pp. 155–158). Rowman and Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Korn J. (2023, May 3). AI pioneer quits Google to warn about the technology’s ‘dangers.’ CNN Business. https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/01/tech/geoffrey-hinton-leaves-google-ai-fears
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Berry D. (2011) The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Eagle J. L. (2023) The role of computational thinking for secondary English language arts teachers: A mixed methods scale development and validation study [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Frabetti F. (2015) Software theory: A cultural and philosophical study. Rowan & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hirsch B. D. (Ed) (2012) Digital humanities pedagogy: Practices, principles and politics. Open Book Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Jockers M. L. (2014) Text analysis with R for students of literature. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kafai Y. B., & Proctor C. (2021) A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kittler F. (1997) There is no software. In Johnston J. (Ed.), Literature, media, information systems (pp. 147–155). Overseas Publishers Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lynch T. L. (2017a) Below the screen: Why multiliteracies research needs to embrace software. English Journal, 106(3), 92–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lynch T. L. (2017b) How English teachers will save the future: Reimagining computer science as the language art it is. STEM Journal, 18(4), 163–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lynch T. L. (2019) Electrical evocations: Computer science, the teaching of literature, and the future of English education. English Education, 52(1), 15–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lynch T. L., & Sulzer M. (forthcoming). New towers of Babel: A conceptual argument for digital platforms as unstable linguistic constructs. In Nichols T. P. & Garcia A. D. (Eds.), Literacies in the platform society: Histories, pedagogies, possibilities. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Manovich L. (2013) Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mills K., Stornaiuolo A., Smith A., & Pandya J. Z. (Eds) (2018) Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Nichols T. P., & Garcia A. D. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Literacies in the platform society: Histories, pedagogies, possibilities. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Nussbaum M. C. (2010) Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ee202332555
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error