Skip to content
2018
Volume 67, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0010-096X
  • E-ISSN: 1939-9006

Abstract

Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein’s writing textbook, has triggered important debates among writing professionals. Not included within these debates,however, is the empirical question of whether the textbook’s templates reflect patterns of language use in actual academic discourses. This article uses corpus-based discourse analysis to examine how two particular “moves” discussed in the textbook are realized in three large corpora of professional and student academic writing. The analysis reveals important differences between the textbook’s wordings and those preferred by student and professional writers. It also uncovers differences in use of “interpersonal”functions of language by experienced and less experienced writers. In offering this detailed analysis of academic prose, I aim to extend calls to recenter language in writing research and instruction. I conclude with implications for discussing academic argumentation with students.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/ccc201628067
2016-02-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/ccc201628067
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error