English Journal - Alternative Assessment, Jan 1997

Argues that the “Standards for the English Language Arts” (SELA) gives English teachers direction. Discusses what “teaching English” means. Suggests that SELA is not a prescriptive list of measurement items nor a cookbook for skillful English teaching: SELA is a statement of principles of, for, and by professionals, and a K-12 statement of process-centered learning and teaching principles.

Suggests that the “Standards for the English Language Arts” (copublished by the National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association) makes good sense about literature and almost none at all about literacy. Argues that for 99% of the school population, the de-emphasis of the “Standards” on formal written communication is “entirely misguided.”

Traces the public furor that greeted the National Council of Teachers/International Reading Association’s “Standards for the English Language Arts.” Discusses responses to criticisms. Argues that the language in the “Standards” is flat; the standards are meant to be guidelines, not mandates; and the emphasis was on process.