- NCTE Publications Home
- All Journals
- College English
- Previous Issues
- Volume 71, Issue 4, 2009
College English - Volume 71, Issue 4, 2009
Volume 71, Issue 4, 2009
- Articles
-
-
-
Keeping Curious Company: Wayne C. Booth’s Friendship Model of Criticism and the Work of Hunter S. Thompson
Author(s): Stephanie Stiles and Randy HarrisWayne Booth’s model of reader response as “friendship” would seem to be severely tested by the writings of Hunter Thompson, because this author often portrayed himself as someone who was anything but ingratiating. Yet we can indeed apply Booth’s theory to Thompson’s texts, especially if we distinguish their protagonist from what Booth referred to as “the implied author.”
-
-
-
-
Conversation at a Crucial Moment: Hybrid Courses and the Future of Writing Programs
Author(s): Catherine GougeBecause hybrid first-year college writing programs are an emerging phenomenon, it is important for composition specialists to identify their potential strengths and possible disadvantages. The author reviews the various forms that such programs have taken so far, and she engages in an extended critique of one particular institution’s model, questioning especially its claims to objectivity.
-
-
-
How to Teach for Social Justice: Lessons from Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Cognitive Science
Author(s): Mark BracherThe author explains how principles of cognitive science can help teachers of literature use texts as a means of increasing students’ commitment to social justice. Applying these principles to a particular work, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, he calls particular attention to the relationship between cognitive science and literary schemes for building reader empathy.
-
-
-
Texts of Our Institutional Lives: “What’s in a Name?”: Institutional Critique, Writing Program Archives, and the Problem of Administrator Identity
Author(s): Steve LamosWhen scholars write about their research into writing programs’ archives,they often face the ethical question of whether to name the administrators who were involved in documents. The author identifies and provides examples of three basic orientations to this issue, which he calls overt-historical, covert-qualitative, and hybrid-institutional. Referring to his own research experience, he ultimately endorses the third approach.
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 86 (2023 - 2024)
-
Volume 85 (2022 - 2023)
-
Volume 84 (2021 - 2022)
-
Volume 83 (2020 - 2021)
-
Volume 82 (2019 - 2020)
-
Volume 81 (2018 - 2019)
-
Volume 80 (2017 - 2018)
-
Volume 79 (2016 - 2017)
-
Volume 78 (2015 - 2016)
-
Volume 77 (2014 - 2015)
-
Volume 76 (2013 - 2014)
-
Volume 75 (2012 - 2013)
-
Volume 74 (2011 - 2012)
-
Volume 73 (2010 - 2011)
-
Volume 72 (2009 - 2010)
-
Volume 71 (2008 - 2009)
-
Volume 70 (2007 - 2008)
-
Volume 69 (2006 - 2007)
-
Volume 68 (2005 - 2006)
-
Volume 67 (2004 - 2005)
-
Volume 66 (2003 - 2004)
-
Volume 65 (2002 - 2003)
-
Volume 64 (2001 - 2002)
-
Volume 63 (2000 - 2001)
-
Volume 62 (1999 - 2000)
-
Volume 61 (1998 - 1999)
-
Volume 60 (1998)
-
Volume 59 (1997)
-
Volume 58 (1996)
-
Volume 57 (1995)
-
Volume 56 (1994)
-
Volume 55 (1993)
-
Volume 54 (1992)
-
Volume 53 (1991)
-
Volume 52 (1990)
-
Volume 51 (1989)
-
Volume 50 (1988)
-
Volume 49 (1987)
-
Volume 48 (1986)
-
Volume 47 (1985)
-
Volume 46 (1984)
-
Volume 45 (1983)
-
Volume 44 (1982)
-
Volume 43 (1981)
-
Volume 42 (1980)
-
Volume 41 (1979 - 1980)
-
Volume 40 (1978 - 1979)
-
Volume 39 (1977 - 1978)
-
Volume 38 (1976 - 1977)
-
Volume 37 (1975 - 1976)
-
Volume 29 (1967 - 1976)
-
Volume 36 (1974 - 1975)
-
Volume 35 (1973 - 1974)
-
Volume 34 (1972 - 1973)
-
Volume 33 (1971 - 1972)
-
Volume 32 (1970 - 1971)
-
Volume 31 (1969 - 1970)
-
Volume 30 (1968 - 1969)
-
Volume 28 (1966 - 1967)
-
Volume 27 (1965 - 1966)
-
Volume 26 (1964 - 1965)
-
Volume 25 (1963 - 1964)
-
Volume 24 (1962 - 1963)
-
Volume 23 (1962)