Skip to content
2018
Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1074-4762
  • E-ISSN: 1943-3069
side by side viewer icon HTML
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/vm201829516
2018-03-01
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/vm/25/3/voicesmiddle29516.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/vm201829516&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bandura A. (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Betts J. D. (2006) Multimedia arts learning in an activity system: New literacies for at risk children. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 7(7). Retrieved fromhttp://www.ijea.org/v7n7/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dozier C., Johnston P., Rogers R. (2006) Critical literacy/critical teaching: Tools for preparing responsive teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Emdin C. (2016) For White folks who teach in the hood… and the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Boston, MA: Beacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Engeström Y. (1987) Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foot K. (2014) Cultural-historical activity theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 24, 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gee J. P. (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy?. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill N. E., Tyson D. F. (2009) Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740–763.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ivey G., Johnston P. (2015) Engaged reading as a collaborative transformative practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 297–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jeynes W. H. (2007) The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondaryschool student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Knobel M. (1999) Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ladson-Billings G. (2006) “Yes, but how do we do it?" Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. InLandsman J. G., Lewis C. W. (Eds.), White teachers’ diverse classrooms: Creating inclusive schools, building on students’ diversity, and providing true educational equity (pp. 33–46). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee J. S., Bowen N. K. (2006) Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewis Ellison T. (2014) Digital ontologies of self: Two African American adolescents co-construct and negotiate identities through The Sims 2. Digital Culture & Education, 6(4), 317–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis Ellison T. (2017) Digital participation, agency, and choice: An African American youth’s digital storytelling about Minecraft. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(1), 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lewis Ellison T., Wang H. (2018) Resisting and redirecting: Agentive practices within an African American parent-child dyad during digital storytelling. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(1), 53–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis 2nd edition Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Moll L. C., Amanti C., Neff D., Gonzalez N. (1992) Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rogoff B. (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Roth W. M. (2007) Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14, 1–2 40–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Roth W. M., Lee Y. J. (2007) “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Smagorinsky P., Guay M., Lewis Ellison T., Willis A. I.. in press The social contexts that shape the reading experience. InMoje E. B., Afflerbach P., Enciso P., Lesaux N. K. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol V. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vasudevan L. (2006) Making known differently: Engaging visual modalities as spaces to author new selves. E-Learning, 3(2), 207–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wurdinger S., Haar J., Hugg B., Bezon J. (2007) A qualitative study using project-basedlearning in a mainstream middle school. Improving Schools, 10(2), 150–61.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/vm201829516
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/vm201829516
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error