Skip to content
2018
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1522-6115
  • E-ISSN: 1943-3085
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tp202131537
2021-10-01
2023-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abadin C. (2021) Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1, pp.77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alamillo L., Mercado-López L. M. & Herrera C. (2018) Introduction. InAlamillo L., Mercado-López L. M. & Herrera C., (Eds.). Voices of resistance: Interdisciplinary approaches to Chican@ children’s literature (pp.ix–xv). Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen C. (2012) Makers: The new industrial revolution. Crown.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aragón C. J. (2018) Representations of sexual and queer identities in Chicana/o-Latina/o children’s literature. InAlamillo L., Mercado-López L. M., and Herrera C., (Eds.). Voices of resistance: Interdisciplinary approaches to Chican@ children’s literature (pp.105–119). Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baeza Ventura G. (2016) Latino literature for children and the lack of diversity. InHerrera C. and Mercado-López L. M., (Eds.). (Re)mapping the Latina/o literary landscape: New works and new directions (pp.241–254). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackburn M. V. (2012) Interrupting hate: Homophobia in schools and what literacy can do about it. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boffone T. (2021) Renegades: Digital dance cultures from Dubsmash to TikTok. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. boyd d. (2014) It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavalcante A. (2019) Tumbling into queer utopias and vortexes: Experiences of LGBTQ social media users on Tumblr. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(12), 1715–1735.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cease B. & Wilmarth M. (2016) Blogging about books: How choice in modality influences upper elementary students’ responses to reading. Talking Points, 28(1), 3–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chrisman A. & Blackburn M. V. (2019) Interrogating happiness: Unraveling homophobia in the lives of queer youth of color with More Happy than Not.InGinsberg R. & Glenn W., (Eds.). Engaging with multicultural YA literature in the secondary classroom: Critical approaches for critical educators (pp.83–92). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fisher D. & Frey N. (2018) Raise reading volume through access, choice, discussion, and book talks. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1691.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox J. & Ralston R. (2016) Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65 635–642. https://doi.org/10.10 16j.chb.2016.06.009.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner H. & Davis K. (2013) The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gee J. P. (2000) Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee J. P. (2017) Affinity spaces and 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 57(2), 22–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hagood M. C. (2008) Intersections of popular culture, identities, and new literacies research. InCoiro J., Knobel M., Lankshear C. & Leu D. J., (Eds.). Handbook of research on new literacies (pp.531–551). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hatch M. (2014) The maker-movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Headley J.[@ezeekat] (2020, September6). I may not be a patient person. [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ezeekat/video/6869457586840751366?lang=en&is_copy_url=1&is_from_webapp=v1.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hermann-Wilmarth J., Lannen R. & Ryan C. (2017) Critical literacy and transgender topics in an upper elementary classroom: A portrait of possibility. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 13(1), 15–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hermann-Wilmarth J. & Ryan C. (2019) Reading and teaching the rainbow: Making elementary school classrooms LGBTQ-inclusive. American Educator, 43(1), 17–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Herrera C. (2020) ChicaNerds in Chicana young adult literature: Brown and nerdy. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hitt J. (2013) Bunch of amateurs: Inside America’s hidden world of inventors, tinkerers, and job creators. Broadway.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang L.[@faerietalebooks] (2020, September22). This under jacket is gorgeous!. [Video]. TikTok. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMeFxyUjC/.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jayy A.[@thepictureofjayyash] (2021, March9). What do you love about Cemetery Boys? (Part three). [Video]. TikTok. https://bit.ly/3eTu2Sn.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jenzen O. (2017) Trans youth and social media: Moving between counterpublics and the wider web. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1626–1641.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kant T. (2020) Making it personal: Algorithmic personalization, identity, and everyday life. Oxford Scholarship Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Loya L. & Almeida E. (2020) Things that shouldn’t have gay energy but do anyways: CTI, remixes, and TikTok duets. Flow Journal, 27(1 http://www.flowjournal.org/2020/09/cti-remixes-tiktok-duets/.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mathison Y. (2017) Growing up Asian American in young adult fiction. University Press of Mississippi.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Merga M. K. (2021) How can BookTok on TikTok inform readers’ advisory services for young people?. Library and Information Science Research, 43(2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101091.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruehlicke A. (2020, Oct.1). All the content, just for you: TikTok and personalization. Flow Journal, 27(1 http://www.flowjournal.org/2020/10/content-just-for-you/.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schey R. (2019) Youth’s choices to read optional queer texts in a high school ELA classroom: Navigating visibility through literacy sponsorship. English Education, 52(1), 38–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Shirky C. (2010) Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Street B. (1984) Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas A.[@aidenschmaiden] (2020, October9). NOT ME SEEING MY OWN BOOK ON MY FYP. [Video]. TikTok. https://vm.tiktok.com/Z MeFxVKkh/.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tierney R. J. (2007) Learning with multiple literacies: Observations of lives exploring meanings, identities, possibilities, and worlds. InFlood J., Heath S. B. & Lapp D., (Eds.). Handbook on research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts, volumneII (pp.101–108). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wargo J. M. (2019) Lights! Cameras! Genders? Interrupting hate through classroom tinkering, digital media production and [q]ulturally sustaining arts-based inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 58(1), 18–28. doi:10.1080/00405841.2018.1536919.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wollman-Bonilla J. & Werchadlo B. (1999) Teacher and peer roles in scaffolding first graders’ responses to literature. The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 598–607.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/tp202131537
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error