State-Defined Literacy and the Narrated Experiences of Three Elementary Teachers

References

1. Au W. (2007) High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Au W. (2016) High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Au W. (2017) What the resistance to high-stakes testing can teach us about urban classrooms. In G. Sirrakos & C. Emdin (Eds.),. Between the world and the urban classroom (pp. 35–42). Sense.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ball S. J. (2015) Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy,, 30(3), 299–301.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brass J. (2015) Standards-based governance of English teaching, past, present and future?. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14(3), 241–259.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bruner J. (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.,.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Connelly F. M, Clandinin D. J. (1990) Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Council of Chief State School Officers (2019) Third grade reading laws: Implementation and impact. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/CCSSO%20CEELO%20third%20grade%20reading.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Darling-Hammond L. (2007) Race, inequality and educational accountability:The irony of “No Child Left Behind.”. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Early Literacy Implementation Law, Iowa State Code276.68 (2014) 
    [Google Scholar]
11. Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Publ. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2016) 
    [Google Scholar]
12. Farley-Ripple E.May H. Karpyn A.Tilley K.McDonough K. (2018) Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Glesne C. (2011) Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Graue E.Johnson E. (2011) Reclaiming assessment through accountability that is “just right.”. Teachers College Record, 113(8), 1827–1862.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hikida MTaylor L.A. (2020, 126). “As the test collapses in”: Teaching and learning amid high-stakes testing in two urban elementary classrooms. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920902263.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jennings J. M.Bearak J. L. (2014) “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554449.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kearns L.-L. (2013) The construction of ‘illiterate’ and ‘literate’ youth:The effects of high-stakes standardized literacy testing. Race, ethnicity, and education, 19(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.843520.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kim J.-H. (2016) Understanding narrative inquiry:The craft-ing and analysis of stories. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Love B. L. (2019) We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Merriam S. (2009) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mississippi Department of Education (2019) Pass rate for 3rd grade reading test increases after first retest. https://www.mdek12.org/news/2019/6/4/PassRate-for-3rd-Grade-Reading-Test-Increases-AfterFirst-Retest_20190604.
22. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2001).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Parkison P. (2009) Political economy and the NCLB regime: Accountability, standards, and high-stakes testing. The Educational Forum, 73(1), 44–57.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ravitch D. (2014) Reign of error:The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ravitch D. (2016) The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Saldaña J. (2014) Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schneider R. S.Jacobsen R.White J.Gehlbach H. (2018) The (mis)measure of schools: How data affect stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of quality.. Teachers College Record, 120(6).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Vygotsky L. S. (2012) Thought and language. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]