Skip to content
2018
Volume 52, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0098-6291
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2356

Abstract

This article shares findings from a research study on writing students’ preferences, needs, and success rates across in-person, hybrid, and asynchronous online modalities and the implications for department scheduling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc2024522149
2024-12-01
2026-06-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bensimon Estela Mara, et al. “Five Principles for Enacting Equity by Design.” Diversity & Democracy: The Equity Imperative, vol. 19, no. 1 2016, pp 8–11. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/Publications/Archives/Diversity-Democracy/DD_19-1_WI16.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blankenship Lisa, et al. “Lessons Learned and Hopeful Ways Forward for Online, Hybrid, and In-Person First-Year Writing Instruction and Writing Program Decision Making.” 74th Annual Conference on College Composition and Communication Convention, 17 Feb. 2023, Chicago Hilton, Chicago, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borgman Jessie, and McArdle Casey. Personal, Accessible, Responsive, Strategic: Resources and Strategies for Online Writing Instructors, WAC Clearinghouse / UP of Colorado 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borgman Jessie, et al. Report of the CCCC Standing Group for Best Practice in Online Writing Instruction (OWI): The 2021 State of the Art of OWI Report. Conference on College Composition and Communication 2021, https://cccc.ncte.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2021SoAFullReport.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown McNair Tia, et al. From Equity Talk to Equity Walk: Expanding Practitioner Knowledge for Racial Justice in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Curelaru Mihai, et al. “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Approach.” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13 2022 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138138.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Agostino Susan. “Clarity, Confusion on ‘Regular and Substantive Interaction’.” Inside Higher Ed, 16 Nov. 2022, www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/11/17/regular-and-substantive-interaction-online-college.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Delnoij Laurie E. C., et al. “Predicting and Resolving Non-Completion in Higher (Online) Education—A Literature Review.” Educational Research Review, vol. 29 2020 https://research.ou.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/23691785/1_s2.0_S1747938X1930171X_main.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. “Fast Facts 2024.” American Association of Community Colleges 2024, www.aacc.nche.edu/research-trends/fast-facts/.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. “Fast Facts: Undergraduate Graduation Rates.” National Center for Education Statistics, 31 May 2022, https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fredericksen Eric E., et al. CHLOE 9: Strategy Shift: Institutions Respond to Sustained Online Demand. Quality Matters, Eduventures & EDUCAUSE Survey of Chief Online Learning Officers 2024, https://qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Eduventures-EDUCAUSE-CHLOE%209-Report-2024.pdf?token=pijkZPAz597SDLjsukzUZUO_1Y3te7JYUsxeYP_Gm4k.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia Gina Ann. Defining “Servingness” at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs): Practical Implications for HSI Leaders. American Council on Education 2019, www.equityinhighered.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Garcia-Essay-FINAL.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia Gina Ann editor Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) in Practice: Defining “Servingness” at HSIs. Information Age 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giordano Joanne Baird, et al. Reaching All Writers: A Pedagogical Guide for Evolving College Writing Classrooms. Utah State UP 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Glaser Barney, and Strauss Anselm. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill Phil. “Deeper Look at Fall 2022 IPEDS Data, Part I.” On EdTech Newsletter, 23 Jan. 2024, https://onedtech.philhillaa.com/p/deeper-look-fall-2022-ipeds-part-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Inoue Asao B. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Just Future. The WAC Clearinghouse 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Inoue Asao B., and Poe Mya. “How to Stop Harming Students: An Ecological Guide to Antiracist Writing Assessment.” Composition Studies, vol. 48, no. 3 2020, pp 14–15. https://compstudiesjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/poeinoue_full-3.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mather Meera, and Sarkans Alena. “Student Perceptions of Online and Face-to-Face Learning.” International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 10, no. 2 2018, pp 61–76. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207234.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McPartlan Peter, et al. “Modality Motivation: Selection Effects and Motivational Differences in Students Who Choose to Take Courses Online.” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 49 2021 Science Direct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100793.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Morett Chris. “Five Actions to Address Inequities in Course Scheduling.” Inside Higher Ed, 3 Apr. 2024, www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/04/03/5-ways-make-course-scheduling-more-equitable-opinion.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nalbone David, et al. “Salient Factors in Predicting Student Success, Including Course Modality.” International Journal Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, vol. 17, no. 1 2023 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol17/iss1/11/.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. O’Neill Kevin, et al. “Modeling Undergraduates’ Selection of Course Modality: A Large Sample, Multi-Discipline Study.” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 48 2021 Science Direct, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. The Online Writing Instruction Community. The OWI Community 2023, www.owicommunity.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. “Quick Facts.” Yakima Valley College 2023, www.yvcc.edu/oie/quick-facts.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Villalobos Meléndez Alejandra. “Learning from Changes in Course Modality through the COVID-19 Pandemic to Practice Servingness.” 14th Annual AHSIE Best Practices Conference, 29 Mar. 2022, Santa Ana Pueblo, NM. https://ahsie.org/s/Learning-From-Changes-in-Course-Modality.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Voss Julia, and Bruchmann Kathryn. “‘It’s Complicated’: Scheduling as an Intellectual, Networked Social Justice Issue for WPAs.” Systems Shift: Creating and Navigating Change in Rhetoric and Composition Administration edited by Carter Genesea M. and Matzke Aurora, The WAC Clearinghouse / UP of Colorado 2023, pp 293–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Witham Keith, et al. America’s Unmet Promise: The Imperative for Equity in Higher Education. American Association of Colleges and Universities 2015, www.aacu.org/publication/americas-unmet-promise-the-imperative-for-equity-in-higher-education.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu Di, and Jaggars Shanna Smith. Online and Hybrid Course Enrollment and Performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges. Community College Research Center, Mar. 2011, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/online-hybrid-performance-washington.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc2024522149
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc2024522149
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test