oa Feature: The Misalignment between the Discipline and the Teaching of Writing

References

1. Abraham Matthew. “Rhetoric and Composition’s Conceptual Indeterminacy as Political-Economic Work.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 68, no. 1 2016, pp 68–97.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andelora Jeff. “The Teacher/Scholar: Reconstructing Our Professional Identity in Two-Year Colleges.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 32, no. 3 2005, pp 307–22.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Calhoon-Dillahunt Carolyn. “2018 CCCC Chair’s Address: Returning to Our Roots: Creating the Conditions and Capacity for Change.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 70, no. 2 2018, pp 273–93.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cox Anicca, et al. “The Indianapolis Resolution: Responding to Twenty-First Century Exigencies/Political Economies of Composition Labor.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 68, no. 1 2016, pp 38–67.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Del Principe Annie. “Cultivating a Sustainable TYC Writing Program: Collaboration, Disciplinarity, and Faculty Governance.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 43, no. 3 2020, pp 54–72.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Del Principe Annie, and Brady Jacqueline. “Academic Freedom and the Idea of a Writing Program.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 45, no. 4 2018, pp 351–60.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Giordano Joanne Baird, et al. “TYCA Working Paper #9: Contingent Labor and Workload in Two-Year College English.” Two-Year College English Association 2021, pp 1–12.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Griffiths Brett. “Professional Autonomy and Teacher-Scholar-Activists in Two-Year Colleges: Preparing New Faculty to Think Institutionally.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 45, no. 1 2017, pp 47–68.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Halpern Faye. “Strategic Disingenuousness: The WPA, the ‘Scribbling Women,’ and the Problem of Expertise.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 66, no. 4 2015, pp 643–67.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hanson Gina, and Chloe de los Reyes. “Identity Crisis: Daring to Identify as More than ‘Just’ Adjunct Composition Instructors.” FORUM: Issues about Part-Time and Contingent Faculty, vol. 22, no. 2 2019, pp A4–A15.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hassel Holly, and Giordano Joanne Baird. “Occupy Writing Studies: Rethinking College Composition for the Needs of the Teaching Majority.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 65, no. 1 2013, pp 117–39.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jensen Darin L., et al. “Embracing the Democratic Promise: Transforming Two-Year Colleges and Writing Studies through Professional Engagement.” New Directions for Community Colleges, vol. 2021, no. 194 2021, pp 55–66.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Klausman Jeffrey, et al. “TYCA Working Paper #1: Two-Year College English Faculty Teaching Workload.” Two-Year College English Association 2020, pp 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lamos Steve. “Credentialing College Writing Teachers: WPAs and Labor Reform.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 35, no. 1 2011, pp 45–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Michaud Christina, and Hardy Sarah Madsen. “CLA and WPA: A Justice-Oriented Approach to Writing Program Administration.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 60 2023, pp 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ostman Heather. Writing Program Administration and the Community College. Parlor Press 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Reid E. Shelley, et al. “The Effects of Writing Pedagogy Education on Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Approaches to Teaching Composition.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol. 36, no. 1 2012, pp 32–73.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Rubin Herbert J., and Rubin Irene S. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 3rd ed., SAGE Publications 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rutz Carol, and Wilhoit Stephen. “What Is Faculty Development?” A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators edited by Malenczyk Rita, 2nd ed., Parlor Press 2016, pp 233–44.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Seigel Marika, et al. “Monstrous Composition: Reanimating the Lecture in First-Year Writing Instruction.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 71, no. 4 2020, pp 643–71.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sullivan Patrick. “The Two-Year College Teacher-Scholar-Activist.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 42, no. 4 2015, pp 327–50.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Thomas David R. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, no. 2 2006, pp 237–46.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Toth Christie, et al. “Two-Year College Teacher-Scholar-Activism.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 71, no. 1 2019, pp 86–116.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Toth Christina M., et al. “‘Distinct and Significant’: Professional Identities of Two-Year College English Faculty.” College Composition & Communication, vol. 65, no. 1 2013, pp 90–116.
    [Google Scholar]
25. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0), Approved July 17, 2014.” Council of Writing Program Administrators, 18 July 2019, https://wpacouncil.org/aws/CWPA/pt/sd/news_article/243055/_PARENT/layout_details/false. Accessed 5 Feb. 2021.
    [Google Scholar]