Skip to content
2018
Volume 50, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0098-6291
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2356

Abstract

This article explores the Reading Apprenticeship framework as a support for instructors to orchestrate dynamic, contextualized literacy instruction that supports both student engagement and deeper learning about the discipline of writing studies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202232299
2022-12-01
2025-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anson, Chris M., and MooreJessie L., editors. Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer. WAC Clearinghouse; UP of Colorado 2016. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0797.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagwell, Lora. Personal Interview. 3June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron, Naomi S.How We Read Now: Strategic Choices for Print, Screen, and Audio. Oxford UP 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bean, John C.Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Becerra, Ana M., and WeissglassJulian. Take It Up: Leading for Educational Equity. National Coalition for Equity and Education 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandt, Deborah. The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy. Cambridge UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bransford, John. D., et al., editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campaign for College Opportunity. Spotlight Practice: Reading Apprenticeship Community College STEM Network. Sept. 2017. https://readingapprenticeship.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/RACCSN-CCO-Spotlight-Report.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carillo, Ellen C. “Preparing College-Level Readers to Define Reading as More Than Mastery.” Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom, edited byPatrickSullivan et al., National Council of Teachers of English 2017, pp. 188-209.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carillo, Ellen C.Securing a Place for Reading in Composition: The Importance of Teaching for Transfer. Utah State UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corrin, William, et al.The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Findings from the Second Year of Implementation (NCEE 2009-4036). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, Laura J. “Getting to the Root of the Problem: Teaching Reading as a Process in the Sciences.” What Is College Reading?, edited byAlice S.Horning et al., WAC Clearinghouse; UP of Colorado 2017, pp. 161–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Delpit, Lisa. “Multiplication Is for White People”: Raising Expectations for Other People’s Children. New Press 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edmunds, Kimberly. Weaving More Effective Teaching and Learning Practices in Mathematics and Beyond: Adopting Reading Apprenticeship at Pasadena City College. Equal Measure 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Escobar, Jennifer. Personal Interview. 3May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Foster, Ann. Personal Interview. 26Sept. 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox, Tom. Defending Access: A Critique of Standards in Higher Education. Heineman 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gabay, Esther M. “Drawing to Read: Students Using Creative Approaches to Access Complex Texts in First-Year Writing.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 49, no. 4 2022, pp. 353—68.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goen, Sugie, and Gillotte-TroppHelen. “Integrating Reading and Writing: A Response to the Basic Writing ‘Crisis.’”Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 22, no. 2 2003, pp. 90-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Graff, Nelson, et al. “Understandings of Reading.” Reading across the Disciplines, edited byKarenManarin, Indiana UP 2022, pp. 44–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Greenleaf, Cynthia L., et al. “Integrating Literacy and Science in Biology: Teaching and Learning Impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development.” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 48, no. 3 2011, pp. 647–717.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenleaf, Cynthia, et al.Reading for Understanding: How Reading Apprenticeship Improves Disciplinary Learning in Secondary and College Classrooms. 3rd ed., Wiley, forthcoming 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Greenleaf, Cynthia, et al.A Study of the Efficacy of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development for High School History and Science Teaching and Learning. Final report to the Institute for Education Sciences 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Grubb, W. Norton, et al.Honored but Invisible: An Inside Look at Teaching in Community Colleges. Routledge 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hammond, Zaretta. Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students. Corwin 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hogan, Nika, and RoseShelagh. “This Is What We Came Here to Do: Literacy at the Heart of Institutional Culture Change.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 62, no. 3 2018, pp. 337–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Horning, Alice S., et al., editors. What Is College Reading?WAC Clearinghouse; UP of Colorado 2017. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-B.2017.0001.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen, et al. “Nurturing Nature: How Brain Development Is Inherently Social and Emotional, and What This Means for Education.” Educational Psychologist, vol. 54, no. 3 2019, pp. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633924.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Inoue, Asao B. “How Do We Language So People Stop Killing Each Other, or What Do We Do about White Language Supremacy?”College Composition and Communication, vol. 71, no. 2 2019, pp. 352–69. https://library.ncte.org/journals/CCC/issues/v71-2/30427.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Inoue, Asao B. “Teaching Antiracist Reading.” Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 50, no. 3 2020, pp. 134–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1787079.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jamieson, Sandra. “Reading and Engaging Sources: What Students’ Use of Sources Reveals about Advanced Reading Skills.” Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum, special issue of Across the Disciplines, vol. 10, no. 4 2013. https://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kiefson, Ruth. “The Social Dimension of the Community College Classroom.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol. 46, no. 1 2018, pp. 56–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lave, Jean, and WengerEtienne. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge UP 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lockhart, Tara, and SolidayMary. “The Critical Place of Reading in Writing Transfer (and Beyond): A Report of Student Experiences.” Pedagogy, vol. 16, no. 1 2016, pp. 23–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maroudas, Carla. Personal Interview. 10June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Middendorf, Joan, and ShopkowLeah. Overcoming Student Learning Bottlenecks: Decode the Critical Thinking of Your Discipline. Stylus 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. National Academies Press 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.17226/24783.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Odom, Mary Lou. “Not Just for Writing Anymore: What WAC Can Teach Us about Reading to Learn.” Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum, special issue of Across the Disciplines, vol. 10, no. 4 2013. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/atd/reading/odom.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pearlman, Steven J. “It’s Not that They Can’t Read; It’s that They Can’t Read: Can We Create ‘Citizen Experts’ through Interactive Assessment?”Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum, special issue of Across the Disciplines, vol. 10, no. 4 2013).https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/atd/reading/pearlman.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pearson, P. D., et al.Reaping the Rewards of the Reading for Understanding Initiative. National Academy of Education 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Renton Technical College. Reading Apprenticeship [unpublished raw course data]. 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Salvatori, Mariolina Rizzi, and DonahuePatricia. “What Is College English? Stories about Reading: Appearance, Disappearance, Morphing, and Revival.” College English, vol. 75, no. 2 2012, pp. 199-217.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sandler, Scott. Personal Interview. 31Aug. 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schoenbach, Ruth, et al.Leading for Literacy: A Reading Apprenticeship Approach. Wiley 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schoenbach, Ruth, et al.Reading for Understanding: How Reading Apprenticeship Improves Disciplinary Learning in Secondary and College Classrooms. 2nd ed., Wiley 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Servais, Lauren. Personal Interview. 27May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sullivan, Patrick. “The World Confronts Us with Uncertainty: Deep Reading as a Threshold Concept.” (Re)considering What We Know: Learning Thresholds in Writing, Composition, Rhetoric, and Literacy, edited byLindaAdler-Kassner and WardleElizabeth, Utah State UP 2019, pp. 113–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sullivan, Patrick, et al.Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom. National Council of Teachers of English 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. UCLA Social Research Methodology Evaluation Group. PCC Pathways Student Success Study. 2015. https://pasadena.edu/academics/support/pathways/docs/Pathways_Student_Success_Study_ucla.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard UP 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Warren, Nanda. Who Determines What Language Choices We Get to Make when Writing?California Community Colleges Success Network. https://readtolearn.calstate.edu/node/172.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wolf, Maryanne. Readers, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. Harper 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Yancey, Kathleen Blake, et al.Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing. Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202232299
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202232299
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error