Feature: Decoding Writing Studies: First-Generation Students, Pedagogies of Access, and Threshold Concepts

References

1. Adler-KassnerLindaWardleElizabeth. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing StudiesUtah State UP2015.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adler-KassnerLindaWardleElizabeth. (Re)Considering What We Know: Learning Thresholds in Writing, Composition, Rhetoric, and LiteracyUP of Colorado2020.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AguiarChristian. “‘What Work Is’: Writing about Work in First-Year Composition”Teaching English in the Two-Year College4622018, pp 147–52.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AndrusSonjaet al.. “Teaching for Writing Transfer: A Practical Guide for Teachers”Teaching English in the Two-Year College4712019, pp 76–89.
   [Google Scholar]
5. AnyonJean. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work.”Journal of Education16211980, pp 67–92.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BallCheryl E.LoeweDrew M editorsBad Ideas about WritingWest Virginia U Libraries2017.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BartonDavidHamiltonMary. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One CommunityRoutledge1998.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BelmiPeteret al.. “The Social Advantage of Miscalibrated Individuals: The Relationship between Social Class and Overconfidence and Its Implications for Class-Based Equality.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes11822020, pp 254–82.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BrandtDeborah. Literacy in American LivesCambridge UP2001.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BrandtDeborah. “Remembering Writing, Remembering Reading.”College Composition and Communication4541994, pp 459–79.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BrewerMeaghan. Conceptions of Literacy: Graduate Instructors and the Teaching of First-Year CompositionUtah State UP2020.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CalarcoJessica McCrory. Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle Class Secures Advantages in SchoolOxford UP2018.
    [Google Scholar]
13. CarilloEllen. “Reading and Writing Are Not Connected.”Bad Ideas about Writingedited byBallCherylLoeweDrew. West Virginia UP2017, pp 38–43.
    [Google Scholar]
14. CushmanEllen. The Struggle and the Tools: Oral and Literate Strategies in an Inner City CommunityState U of New York P1998.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DownsDougRobertsonLiane. “Threshold Concepts in First-Year Composition.”Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLindaWardleElizabeth. Utah State UP2015, pp 105–21.
    [Google Scholar]
16. FormoDawnRobinson NearyKimberly. “Threshold Concepts and FYC Writing Prompts: Helping Students Discover Composition’s Common Knowledge with(in) Assignment Sheets.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College4742020, pp 335–64.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GiordanoJoanne BairdHasselHolly. “Developing Critical Readers in the Age of Literacy Acceleration.”Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture2122021, pp 241–58.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HasselHollyBaird GiordanoJoanne. “Occupy Writing Studies: Rethinking College Composition for the Needs of the Teaching Majority.”College Composition and Communication6512013, pp 117–39.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HasselHollyBaird GiordanoJoanne. “Transfer Institutions, Transfer of Knowledge: The Development of Rhetorical Adaptability and Underprepared Writers.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College3712009, pp 24–40.
    [Google Scholar]
20. HasselHollyPhillipsCassanda. Materiality and Writing Studies: Aligning Labor, Scholarship, and TeachingNational Council of Teachers of English2022.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HeathShirley Brice. Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and ClassroomsCambridge UP1983University website institutional info [removed for blind review].
    [Google Scholar]
22. IsaacsEmily J. Writing at the State U: Instruction and Administration at 106 Comprehensive UniversitiesUtah State UP2018.
    [Google Scholar]
23. JoryJustin M. “Renewing the Promise at Open Access Institutions: Frameworks for Engaging Locally Responsive Writing Instruction.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College4742020, pp 365–91.
    [Google Scholar]
24. KarpMelinda Mechuret al.. “First-Generation Students in Community and Technical Colleges: A National Exploration of Institutional Support Practices.”Center for First-generation Student Success (NASPA—Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education) /Phase Two Advisory2020, https://firstgen.naspa.org/journal-and-research/community-and-technical-college-report.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LareauAnnette. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family LifeU of California P2011.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MaimonElaine P. Leading Academic Change: Vision, Strategy, TransformationStylus2018.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MaukJohnathon. “Location, Location, Location: The ‘Real’ (E)states of Being, Writing, and Thinking in Composition.”College English6542003, pp 368–88.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McNennyGerriFitzgeraldSallyanne H editorsMainstreaming Basic Writers: Politics and Pedagogies of AccessErlbaum2001.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MeyerJan H. F.LandRay editorsOvercoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome KnowledgeRoutledge2006.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MeyerJan H. F.LandRay editors“Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines.”ETL Project Occasional Report 4Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry, and DurhamMay2003, http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MorrellErnest. Critical Literacy and Urban Youth: Pedagogies of Access, Dissent, and LiberationRoutledge2008.
    [Google Scholar]
32. NomiTakako. “Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-Generation Community College Students.”American Association of Community Colleges2005, files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED493531.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
33. OlivasBernice. “See the Student, Meet the Student.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College4912021, pp 12–19.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ParrottJill. “Some People Are Just Born Good Writers.”Bad Ideas about Writingedited byBallCheryl F.LoeweDrew M. West Virginia U Libraries2017, pp 71–75.
    [Google Scholar]
35. “People in Higher Social Class Have an Exaggerated Belief that They Are More Capable Than Others.”. American Psychological Association20May2019, https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/05/social-class-exaggerated-beliefPress release.
    [Google Scholar]
36. PhillipsCassandraet al.. “Thinking Like a Writer: Threshold Concepts and First-Year Writers in Open-Admissions Classrooms.”(Re)Considering What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studiesedited byAdler-KassnerLindaWardleElizabeth. UP of Colorado2020, pp 56–75.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Price-DennisDetraSealey-RuizYolanda. Advancing Racial Literacies in Teacher Education: Activism for Equity in Digital SpacesTeachers College Press2021.
    [Google Scholar]
38. RedfordJeremyMulvaney HoyerKathleen. “First-Generation and Continuing-Generation College Students: A Comparison of High School and Postsecondary Experiences.”National Center for Educational StatisticsSeptember2017, nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
39. SelberStuart A. “Reimagining the Functional Side of Computer Literacy.”College Composition and Communication5532004, pp 470–503.
    [Google Scholar]
40. ShorIra. “What Is Critical Literacy?”Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice141999, https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/jppp/vol1/iss4/2/.
    [Google Scholar]
41. SmilgesJ. Logan. “Neuroqueer Literacies; or, Against Able-ReadingCollege Composition and Communication7312021, pp 103–25.
    [Google Scholar]
42. StreetBrian V. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and EducationLongman1995.
    [Google Scholar]
43. SullivanPatrick. “Composition in the Age Neoliberalism: An Interview with Holly Hassel and Joanne Baird Giordano.”College Composition and Communication7312021, pp 126–55.
    [Google Scholar]
44. “Cultural Narratives about Success and the Material Conditions of Class at the Community College.”. Teaching English in the Two-Year College3322005, pp 142–60.
    [Google Scholar]
45. “Cultural Narratives about Success and the Material Conditions of Class at the Community College.”. “The World Confronts Us with Uncertainty: Deep Reading as a Threshold Concept.”(Re)Considering What We Know: Learning Thresholds in Writing, Composition, Rhetoric, and Literacyedited byAdler-KassnerLindaWardleElizabeth. UP of Colorado2020, pp 113–34.
    [Google Scholar]
46. TassoniJohn Paul. “Retelling Basic Writing at a Regional Campus: Iconic Discourse and Selective Function Meet Social Class.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College3322005, pp 171–84.
    [Google Scholar]
47. TinbergHoward. “The Invisible ‘C’: Class and the Community College.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College3322005, pp 125–26.
    [Google Scholar]
48. WardLeeet al.. First-Generation College Students: Understanding and Improving the Experience from Recruitment to CommencementWiley2012.
    [Google Scholar]
49. WeisbergerRonald. “Community Colleges and Class: A Short History.”Teaching English in the Two-Year College3322005, pp 127–41.
    [Google Scholar]
50. WilliamsCheryl J. First-Generation Community College Students and Their Sense of Place: An Opportunity to Succeed; An Opportunity to Belong2017Iowa State UPhD dissertationhttps://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16241.
    [Google Scholar]