Instructional Note: Redesigning Syllabus Review: Mind Maps as a Tool for Engagement in Writing Courses

References

1. Bennett Kevin. “How to Start Teaching a Tough Course: Dry Organization Versus Excitement on the First Day of Class.” College Teaching, vol.52, no.3 2004, pp.106.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Berthoff Ann E. The Making of Meaning: Metaphors, Models, and Maxims for Writing Teachers, Boynton/Cook Publishers 1981.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bigsby Patrick. “The First Day! Breaking the Syllabus Week Script.” GradHacker Blog. 5 September 2018, https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/grad-hacker.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buzan Tony. Use Both Sides of Your Brain: New Mind-Mapping Techniques to Help You Raise All Levels of Your Intelligence and Creativity, Based on the Latest Discoveries of the Human Brain, Plume 1991.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dorn Dean S. “The First Day of Class: Problems and Strategies.” Teaching Sociology, vol.15, no.1 1987, pp.61–72.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dunn Patricia A. Talking, Sketching, Moving: Multiple Literacies in the Teaching of Writing, Heinemann 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Egan Kieran, Judson Gillian. Imagination and the Engaged Learner: Cognitive Tools for the Classroom, Teachers College Press 2016.
   [Google Scholar]
8. “The First Day of Class.”. Cornell University Center for Teaching Innovation 2021, https://teaching.cornell.edu/teaching-resources/designing-your-course/first-day-class.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fleckenstein Kristie S. Embodied Literacies: Imageword and a Poetics of Teaching, University Press 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Scott Fogler H., LeBlanc Steven E. Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grant Terri, Arlene Archer. “Multimodal Mapping: Using Mind Maps to Negotiate Emerging Professional Communication Practices and Identity in Higher Education.” South African Journal of Higher Education, vol.33, no.1, Jan 2019, pp.74–91.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hash Peaches. “Opportunity for Expression: Covid-19, Online Assignments, and Expressive Arts.” The CEA Critic, vol.82, no.3 2020, pp.254–59.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jones Jason B. “Creative Approaches to the Syllabus.’ Prohacker Blog 26Apr 2011, https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kress Gunther. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, Routledge 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Levy Aaron. “Teaching: First Impressions First, or Choosing Atmosphere Over Method and Management.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.31, no.4 2004, pp.412–20.
    [Google Scholar]
16. McCrea Elizabeth A., Lorenzet Steven J. “Mind Mapping: An Experiential Approach to Syllabus Review.” Organization Management Journal, vol.15, no.1, Jan 2018, pp.35–43.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Miller Suzanne M., et al. “A Literacy Pedagogy for Multimodal Composing: Transforming Learning and Teaching.” Multimodal Composing in Classrooms: Learning and Teaching for the Digital World eds Miller Suzanne M., McVee Mary B. Routledge 2012, pp.114–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Robinson Ken, Aronica Lou. Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution That’s Transforming Education, Viking 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sabatino Lindsay A. “Introduction.” Multimodal Composing: Strategies for Twenty-First-Century Writing Consultations eds Sabatino Lindsay L., Fallow Brian. Biddles 2019, pp.3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wette Rosemary. “Using Mind Maps to Reveal and Develop Genre Knowledge in a Graduate Writing Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol.38 Dec 2017, pp.58–71.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wilson Janie H., Wilson Shauna B. “Methods and Techniques: The First Day of Class Affects Student Motivation: An Experimental Study.” Teaching of Psychology, vol.34, no.4 2007, pp.226–30.
    [Google Scholar]