Skip to content
2018
Volume 49, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0098-6291
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2356

Abstract

Lexical analysis with concordancing software offers faculty a simple tool for analyzing reflective texts in first-year composition courses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202131550
2021-09-01
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler-Kassner Linda, Wardle Elizabeth. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, Utah State UP 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews Richard. “Teaching Sentence-Level Grammar for Writing: The Evidence So Far.” Beyond the Grammar Wars: A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in the English/Literacy Classroom edited by Locke Terry. Routledge 2010, pp.91–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony Laurence. “AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.” Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Conference, 10–13 July 2005 Limerick Ireland 729–37 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anthony Laurence developer. AntConc Version Windows 3.5.8, Laurence Anthony’s Website 2019 Software, www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blaauw-Hara Mark. “Transfer Theory, Threshold Concepts, and First-Year Composition: Connecting Writing Courses to the Rest of the College.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.41, no.4 2014, pp.354–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blaauw-Hara Mark. “Why Our Students Need Instruction in Grammar and How We Should Go About It.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.34, no.2 2006, pp.165–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blankenship Chris, et al. “Re-Assessing Composition at Open Access Institutions: Using a Threshold Framework to Reshape Practice.” Journal of Writing Assessment, vol.10, no.1, Jan 2017, pp.1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Camps Anna, et al. “Metalinguistic Activity: The Link Between Writing and Learning to Write.” Metalinguistic Activity in Learning to Write edited by Camps Anna, Milian Marta. Amsterdam UP 2000, pp.103–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carless David, Boud David. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.43, no.8 2018, pp.1315–25. Taylor & Francis Online 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen Honglin, Myhill Debra. “Children Talking about Writing: Investigating Metalinguistic Understanding.” Linguistics and Education, vol.35 Sept 2016, pp.100–08. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cousin Glynis. “An Introduction to Threshold Concepts.” Planet, vol.17, no.1 2006, pp.4–5. Taylor & Francis Online 10.11120/plan.2006.00170004.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DeJoy Nancy C. Process This: Undergraduate Writing in Composition Studies, Utah State UP 2004 Utah State University Digital Commons@USU https://digital commons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1 149&context=usupress_pubs.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Downs Douglas, Wardle Elizabeth. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College Composition and Communication, vol.58, no.4 2007, pp.552–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fontich Xavier. “L1 Grammar Instruction and Writing: Metalinguistic Activity as a Teaching and Research Focus.” Language and Linguistics Compass, vol.10, no.5 2016, pp.238–54. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/lnc3.12184.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Froehlich Heather. “Corpus Analysis with AntConc.” The Programming Historian, vol.4 2015 10.46430/phen0043.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Giovanelli Marcello. Teaching Grammar, Structure and Meaning: Exploring Theory and Practice for Post-16 English Language Teachers, Routledge 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Halliday M. A. K., Matthiessen Christian. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed., Routledge 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartwell Patrick. “Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” College English, vol.47, no.2 1985, pp.105–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hillocks George Jr. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching, National Council of Teachers of English 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hyland Fiona, Hyland Ken. “Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol.10, no.3 2001, pp.185–212. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00038‑8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jesson Rebecca, et al. “Creating Dialogic Spaces: Talk as a Mediational Tool in Becoming a Writer.” International Journal of Educational Research, vol.80 2016, pp.155–63. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meyer Jan H. F., Land Ray. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education, vol.49, no.3 2005, pp.373–88. SpringerLink, doi:10.1007/s10734‑004‑6779‑5.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Myhill Debra, Jones Susan. “Conceptualizing Metalinguistic Understanding in Writing/Conceptualización de la Competencia Metalingüística en la Escritura.” Cultura y Educación, vol.27, no.4 2015, pp.839–67. University of Wollongong Research Online https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic le=2941&context=sspapers.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Myhill Debra, Newman Ruth. “Metatalk: Enabling Metalinguistic Discussion About Writing.” International Journal of Educational Research, vol.80 2016, pp.177–87. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.007.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rule Hannah J. “Sensing the Sentence: An Embodied Simulation Approach to Rhetorical Grammar.” Composition Studies, vol.45, no.1 2017, pp.19–38. ProQuest https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/sensing-sentence-embodied-simulationapproach/docview/1894919748/se-2?accountid=159965.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “Diving In Deeper: Bringing Basic Writers’ Thinking to the Surface.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol.53, no.8 2010, pp.668–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sommers Jeff. “Reflection Revisited: The Class Collage.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.30 12011, pp.99–129. JSTOR wwwjstor.org/stable/43443909. Accessed 10 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Treglia Maria Ornella. “Feedback on Feedback: Exploring Student Responses to Teachers’ Written Commentary.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.27, no.1 2008, pp.105–37. JSTOR https://wwwjstor.org/stable/43443857.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yancey Kathleen. “Responding Forward.” What Is “College-Level” Writing? Volume 2: Assignments, Readings, and Student Writing Samples edited by Sullivan Patrick, et al.National Council of Teachers of English 2010, pp.300–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yancey Kathleen, et al.Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing, Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202131550
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202131550
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error