Skip to content
2018
Volume 48, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0098-6291
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2356

Abstract

This article describes an initiative to engage quiet students in classroom discussion through the repeated projection of a digital back-channeling platform and the active encouragement of anonymous student participation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202131204
2021-03-01
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bruff Derek. Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments, Jossey-Bass 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coad David. “‘That’s My Face to the Whole Field!’: Graduate Students’ Professional Identity-Building through Twitter at a Writing Studies Conference.” Computers and Composition, vol.45 2017, pp.51–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cronin John. “The Classroom as a Virtual Community: An Experience with Student Backchannel Discourse.” Business Education Innovation Journal, vol.3, no.2 2011, pp.56–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Du Honglu, et al. “Augmenting Classroom Participation through Public Digital Backchannels.” Proceedings of the ACM 2012 International Conference on Support Group Work 2012, pp.155–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenhow Christine and Beth Robelia. “Informal Learning and Identity Formation in Online Social Networks.” Learning, Media, and Technology, vol.34, no.2 2009, pp.119–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ha Jongbum. “Using Mobile-Based Slido for Effective Management of a University English Reading Class.” Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, vol.21, no.4 2018, pp.37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kay Robin and Ann LeSage. “Examining the Benefits and Challenges of Using Audience Response Systems: A Review of the Literature.” Computers and Education, vol.53, no.3 2009, pp.819–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li Jiahang and Christine Greenhow. “Scholars and Social Media: Tweeting in the Conference Backchannel for Professional Learning.” Educational Media International, vol.52, no.1 2015, pp.1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mueller Derek. “Digital Underlife in the Networked Writing Classroom.” Computers and Composition, vol.26, no.4 2009, pp.240–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Muthmainnah Nur. “An Effort to Improve Students’ Activeness at Structure Class Using Slido App.” Journal of English Educators Society, vol.4, no.1 2019, pp.1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ross Claire, et al. “Enabled Backchannel: Conference Twitter Use by Digital Humanists.” Journal of Documentation, vol.67, no.2 2011, pp.214–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Santa Tracy. “Listening in/to the Writing Center: Backchannel and Gaze.” Writing Lab Newsletter, vol.40 9—10 2016, pp.2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thonus Terese. “Tutor and Student Assessments of Academic Writing Tutorials: What Is ‘Success’?” Assessing Writing, vol.8, no.2 2002, pp.110–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yardi Sarita. “Whispers in the Classroom.” Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected edited by Tara McPherson, MIT Press 2008, pp.143–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhonggen Yu and Wang Guifang. “Academic Achievements and Satisfaction of the Clicker-Aided Flipped Business English Writing Class.” Educational Technology & Society, vol.19, no.2 2016, pp.298–312.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc202131204
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error