Feature: Preparing the “New Mainstream” for College and Careers: Academic and Professional Metagenres in Community Colleges

References

1. A.B. 705. Assembly. Reg. Session (C.A. 2017) Enacted.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adler-Kassner Linda. “2017 CCCC Chair’s Address: Because Writing Is Never Just Writing.” College Composition and Communication, vol.69, no.2 2017, pp.317–40.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adler-Kassner Linda, Wardle Elizabeth. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, UP of Colorado 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bailey Thomas R.et al.. Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A Clearer Path to Student Success, Harvard UP 2015 Print.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bailey Thomas, Jeong D. W., Cho Sung-Woo. “Referral, Enrollment, and Completion in Developmental Education Sequences in Community Colleges.” Economics of Education Review, vol.29, no.2 2010, pp.255–70. Print.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bawarshi Anis. “Beyond the Genre Fixation: A Translingual Perspective on Genre.” College English, vol.78, no.3 2016, pp.243–49.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bazerman Charles. “How Natural Philosophers Can Cooperate: The Literary Technology of Coordinated Investigation in Joseph Priestley’s History and Present State of Electricity (1767).” Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities edited by Bazerman Charles, Paradis James G. U of Wisconsin P 1991, pp.13–45.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bazerman Charles. “The Life of Genre, the Life in the Classroom.” Genre and Writing: Issues, Arguments, and Alternatives edited by Bishop Wendy, Ostrom Hans A. Boynton/Cook 1997, pp.19–26.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bazerman Charles, Paradis James D editors Introduction to Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, U of Wisconsin P 1991, pp.13–45.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bazerman Charles, et al. “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” Genre and the New Rhetoric edited by Freeman Aviva, Medway Peter. Taylor & Francis 1994, pp.79–101.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Beaufort Anne. College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction, Utah State UP 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Berkenkotter Carol, Huckin Thomas N. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition, Culture, Power, Lawrence Erlbaum 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bunch George C. “Immigrant Students, English Language Proficiency, and Transitions from High School to Community College.” The Education of Language Minority Immigrants in the United States edited by Wiley Terrence G.et al.. Multilingual Matters 2009, pp.263–94.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bunch George C., Kibler Amanda K. “Integrating Language, Literacy, and Academic Development: Alternatives to Traditional English as a Second Language and Remedial English for Language Minority Students in Community Colleges.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol.39, no.1 2015, pp.20–33.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bunch George C.et al.. “First-Year Composition Faculty in a Changing Community College Policy Landscape: Engagement, Agency and Leadership in the Midst of Reform.” First Year Composition at the Community College: Empowering the Teacher edited by Siegal Meryl, Gilliland Betsy. U of Michigan P in press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bunch George C.et al.. Mapping the Terrain: Language Testing and Placement for US-Educated Language Minority Students in California’s Community Colleges, Report prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation 2011, http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/31m3q6tb.#page-2.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bunch George C.et al.. “‘Sometimes I Do Not Understand Exactly Where the Difficulties Are for My Students’: Language and Literacy for the New Mainstream in Community Colleges.” Community College Review in press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. California Community College Chancellor’s Office. “What Is AB 705?” California Community Colleges 2018, https://assessment.cccco.edu/ab-705-imple mentation. Accessed 8 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Callahan Rebecca M.Muller Chandra. Coming of Political Age: American Schools and the Civic Development of Immigrant Youth, Russell Sage Foundation 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Carter Michael. “Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines.” College Composition and Communication, vol.58, no.3 2007, pp.385–417.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cox Michelle , Myers Zawacki Terry. Introduction, Zawacki and Cox 15–40.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Enright K. A. “Language and Literacy for a New Mainstream.” American Educational Research Journal, vol.48, no.1 2011, pp.80–118.
    [Google Scholar]
23. “Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing.”. Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, and National Writing Project 2011, http://wpacouncil.org/framework. Accessed 8 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Grubb N. W. Basic Skills Education in Community Colleges: Inside and Outside of Classrooms, Routledge 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gutierrez Kris D.et al.. “Re-Mediating the University: Learning through Sociocritical Literacies.” Pedagogies: An International Journal, vol.4, no.1 2009, pp.1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hall Jonathan. “Foreword: Multilinguality across the Curriculum.”, Zawacki and Cox 5–14.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hassel Holly, Baird Giordano Joanne. “The Blurry Borders of College Writing: Remediation and the Assessment of Student Readiness.” College English, vol.78, no.1 2015, pp.56–80.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hassel Holly, Baird Giordano Joanne. “Transfer Institutions, Transfer of Knowledge: The Development of Rhetorical Adaptability and Underprepared Writers.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.37, no.1 2009, pp.24–40.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hern Katie, Snell Myra. Toward a Vision of Accelerated Curriculum and Pedagogy: High Challenge, High Support Classrooms for Underprepared Students, LearningWorks 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hope Laura. L., Stankasas John. “Assembly Bill (AB) 705 Implementation.” Memorandum 10July 2018 California Community Colleges, Academic Senate, https://assessment.cccco.edu/ab-705-implementation.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hull Glynda, Rose Mike. “Rethinking Remediation: Toward a Social-Cognitive Understanding of Problematic Reading and Writing.” Written Communication, vol.6, no.2 1989, pp.139–54.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hyland Ken. “Genre, Discipline and Identity.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol.19, no.4 2015, pp.32–43.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ivanic Roz. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education, vol.18, no.3 2004, pp.220–26.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kibler Amanda K.et al.. “Community College Practices for U.S.-Educated Language-Minority Students: A Resource Oriented Framework.” Bilingual Research Journal, vol.34, no.2 2011, pp.201–22.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lea Mary R., Brian V. Street. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education, vol.23, no.2 1998, pp.157–72.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lee Okhee, et al. “Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics.” Educational Researcher, vol.42, no.4 2013, pp.234–49.
    [Google Scholar]
37. MacDonald Susan P. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Southern Illinois UP 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Matsuda Paul K. “It’s the Wild West Out There: A New Linguistic Frontier in U.S. College Composition.” Literacy as Translingual Practice: Between Communities and Classrooms edited by Canagarajah A. Suresh. Routledge 2013, pp.128–38.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Matsuda Paul K. “The Myth of Linguistic Homogeneity in U.S. College Composition.” College English, vol.68, no.6 2006, pp.637–51.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Miller Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol.70, no.2 1984, pp.151–67.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nuñez Anne-Marie, et al. “English Learners and Their Transition to Postsecondary Education.” Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research edited by Paulsen Michael B. 31 Springer 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ochs Elinor, et al. “‘When I Come Down I’m in the Domain State’: Grammar and Graphic Representation in the Interpretive Activity of Physicists.” Interaction and Grammar edited by Ochs Elinoret al.. Cambridge UP 1996, pp.328–69.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Osborn Jan. Community Colleges and First-Generation Students: Academic Discourse in the Writing Classroom, Palgrave Macmillan 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rodriguez Olgaet al.. Remedial Education Reforms at California’s Community Colleges: Early Evidence on Placement and Curricular Reforms, Public Policy Institute of California 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rose Mike. “The Language of Exclusion: Writing Instruction at the University.” College English, vol.47, no.4 1985, pp.341–59.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ruiz Richard. “Orientations in Language Planning.” NABE Journal, vol.8, no.2 1984, pp.15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Russell David R. “Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis.” Written Communication, vol.14, no.4 1997, pp.504–54.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Russell David R. Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. 2nd ed., Southern Illinois UP 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stewart A. H. “The Role of Narrative Structure in the Transfer of Ideas: The Case and Management Theory.” Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities edited by Bazerman Charles, Paradis James G. U of Wisconsin P 1991, pp.120–44.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Swales John. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications, Cambridge UP 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tinberg Howard. “Reconsidering Transfer Knowledge at the Community College: Challenges and Opportunities.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.43, no.1 2015, pp.7–31.
    [Google Scholar]
52. TYCA Research Committee. “TYCA White Paper on Developmental Education Reforms.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.42, no.3 2015, pp.228–43. Print.
    [Google Scholar]
53. TYCA Research Committee. “TYCA White Paper on Placement Reform.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.44, no.2 2016, pp.135–57.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Valdés Guadalupe. “Between Support and Marginalisation: The Development of Academic Language in Linguistic Minority Children.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol.7 2-3 2004, pp.102–32.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Valdés Guadalupeet al.. Changes in the Expertise of ESL Professionals: Knowledge and Action in an Era of New Standards, TESOL 2014, http://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/papers-and-briefs/professional-paper-26-march-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=4. Accessed 8 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wardle Elizabeth. “‘Mutt Genres’ and the Goal of FYC: Can We Help Students Write the Genres of the University?” College Composition and Communication, vol.60, no.4 2009, pp.765–89.
    [Google Scholar]
57. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0), Approved July 17, 2014.”. Council of Writing Program Administrators, 2014 http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html. Accessed 8 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Yancey Kathleen Blake. “The Literacy Demands of Entering the University.” Handbook of Adolescent Literacy Research edited by Christenbury Leila, et al.Guilford P 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Yancey Kathleen Blakeet al.. Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing, Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Zawacki Terry Myers, Cox Michelle editors WAC and Second-Language Writers: Research towards Linguistically and Culturally Inclusive Programs and Practices, Parlor P 2014.
    [Google Scholar]