Feature: Fractured Reading: Experiencing Students’ Thinking Habits

References

1. “Benner’s Stages of Clinical Competence” (illustration).. NSW Government Health, 2011. From Patricia Benner, From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice,, Addison-Wesley 1984, pp.13–34. health.nsw.gov.au/nursing/projects/documents/novice-expert-benner.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan. 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Berthoff Ann E. The Making of Meaning: Metaphors, Models, and Maxims for Writing Teachers, Boynton/Cook 1981.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berthoff Ann E. “Recognition, Representation, and Revision.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.3, no.3 1981, pp.19–32.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bishop Wendy. “Steal This Assignment: The Radical Revision.” Practice in Context: Situating the Work of Writing Teachers edited by Moore Cindy and Neill Peggy O’. National Council of Teachers of English 2002, pp.205–22.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blau Sheridan. The Literature Workshop: Teaching Texts and Their Readers, Heinemann 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carr Nicholas. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, W.W. Norton 2011.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeJoy Nancy. Process This: Undergraduate Writing in Composition Studies, Utah State UP 2004.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fulwiler Toby. “Provocative Revision.” The Writing Center Journal, vol.12, no.2 1992, pp.190–204.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kaufman Geoff and Mary Flanagan. “High-Low Split: Divergent Cognitive Construal Levels Triggered by Digital and Non-digital Platforms.” Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Publications 2016, pp.2773–77.
   [Google Scholar]
10. National Research Council. “How Experts Differ from Novices.” How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press 2000, pp.31–50.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pink Daniel H. A Whole New Mind: Why Right Brainers Will Rule the Future, Riverhead Books 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Przybylski Andrew K., Netta Weinstein. “Can You Connect with Me Now? How the Presence of Mobile Communication Technology Influences Face-to-Face Conversation Quality.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol.30, no.3 2012, pp.237–46.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Roberts Judith C., Keith Roberts. “Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning: Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Deep Learning in Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology, vol.36, no.2 2008, pp.125–40.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Salvatori Mariolina Rizzi and Patricia Donahue. “Unruly Reading.” Sullivan et al. Deep Reading, 313–36.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Schoenbach Ruthet al.. Reading for Understanding: A Guide to Improving Reading in Middle and High School Classrooms, Jossey-Bass 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “Aesthetic Reading: Struggling Students Sensing Their Way to Academic Success.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.36, no.2 2017, pp.26–53.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “‘All Truly Great Thoughts Are Conceived While Walking’:Academic Inclusion through Multimodal Walkabouts.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.46, no.4 2019, pp.18–21.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “‘Botched Performances’: Rising to the Challenge of Teaching Our Underprepared Students.” Sullivan et al. What Is “College-Level” Writing?, vol.2 209–32.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “Diving in Deeper: Bringing Basic Writers’ Thinking to the Surface,” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol.53, no.8 2010, pp.668–79.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Smith Cheryl Hogue. “Postcards from the Beach.” California English, vol.19, no.1 2013, pp.26–27.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sommers Jeff. “Revisiting Radical Revision.” Critical Expressivism: Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom edited by Roeder Tara and Roseanne Gatto. The WAC Clearinghouse 2015, pp.289–304.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sommers Nancy. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication, vol.31, no.4 1980, pp.378–88.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sullivan Patrick. “‘Deep Reading’ as a Threshold Concept in Composition Studies.” Sullivan et al. Deep Reading, 143–71.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sullivan Patrick. “The UnEssay: Making Room for Creativity in the Composition Class-room.” College Composition and Communication, vol.67, no.1 2015, pp.6–34.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Sullivan Patrick. “What Can We Learn about ‘College-Level’ Writing from Basic Writing Students? The Importance of Reading.” Sullivan et al.. What Is “CollegeLevel” Writing?, vol.2 National Council of Teachers of English 2010, pp.233–53.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sullivan Patrick, et al. editors. Deep Reading: Teaching Reading in the Writing Classroom, National Council of Teachers of English 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sullivan Patrick. What Is “College-Level” Writing? 2 Assignments, Readings, and Student Writing Samples., National Council of Teachers of English 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Vygotsky Lev S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard UP 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wayne Teddy. “Our (Bare) Shelves, Our Selves.” The New York Times, 5Dec. 2015, nytimes.com/2015/12/06/fashion/our-bare-shelves-our-selves.html. accessed 12 Jan. 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wolf Maryanne. Reader, Come Home, HarperCollins 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wolf Maryanne. Tales of Literacy for the 21st Century, Oxford UP 2016.
    [Google Scholar]