Special Section Forum: Issues About Part-Time and Contingent Faculty

References

1. “Academic Misconduct Information for Faculty.” The Ohio State University 2017, https://oaa.osu.edu/academic-integrity-and-misconduct/faculty-obligationsAccessed 12 Mar. 2018
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bloom Lynn Z. “Insider Writing: Plagiarism-Proof Assignments.” Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism: Teaching Writing in the Digital Age, edited by Martha Vicinus and Caroline Eisner, U of Michigan P and U of Michigan Library 2008, pp. 208–46.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dee Thomas S, Brian A Jacob. “Rational Ignorance in Education: A Field Experiment in Student Plagiarism,” Journal of Human Resources, vol.47, no.2 2012, pp. 397–434.
   [Google Scholar]
4. “Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices.” Council of Writing Program Administrators 2003, http://wpacouncil.org/positions/WPA plagiarism.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Howard Rebecca Moore. “Sexuality, Textuality: The Cultural Work of Plagiarism.” College English, vol.62, no.4 2000, pp. 473–491
   [Google Scholar]
6. Howard Rebecca Moore. Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators, Ablex 1999
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ipeirotis Panagiotis. “Why I Will Never Pursue Cheating Again.” A Computer Scientist in a Business School, 17July 2011
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jaschik Scott. “Winning Hearts and Minds in War on Plagiarism.” Inside Higher Ed, 7Apr 2008, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/07/plagiarism/.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Johnson Doug. “Plagiarism-Proofing Assignments.” Phi Delta Kappan, vol.85, no.7 2004, pp. 549–52
   [Google Scholar]
10. Keck Casey. University Student Textual Borrowing Strategies, Northern Arizona U, ProQuest Dissertations 2007
    [Google Scholar]
11. “Kutztown University Policy ACA-027.”, Kutztown University,1997 last updated August 2016, http://app.kutztown.edu/policyregister/policy. aspx?policy=ACA-027.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lewontin Max. “For Adjuncts, a Lot Is Riding on Student Evaluations.” ChronicleVitae, 6Oct 2014, https://chroniclevitae.com/news/741-for-adjuncts-a-lot-isriding-on-student-evaluations.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Modern Language Association. MLA Handbook 8th ed. 2016
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ms Collegiality. “it’s plagiarism; now what?” The Chronicle of Higher Education, http://www.chronicle.com/forums/index.php?topic=17465.0.Accessed 6 Aug. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nelms Gerald. “Why Plagiarism Doesn’t Bother Me at All: A Research-Based Overview of Plagiarism as Educational Opportunity.” Teaching and Learning in Higher Ed, 20July 2015, https://teachingandlearninginhighered.org/2015/07/20/ plagiarism-doesnt-bother-me-at-all-research/.
    [Google Scholar]
16. “The Plagiarism Problem: One Adjunct’s Experience.” AdjunctNation, 23July 2009, https://www.adjunctnation.com/2009/07/23/the-plagiarism-problem-oneadjuncts-experience/.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ipeirotis Panagiotis. “Why I Will Never Pursue Cheating Again.” A Computer Scientist in a Business School, 17July 2011
    [Google Scholar]
18. Power Lori G. “University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism.” The Journal of Higher Education, vol.80, no.6 2009, pp. 643–62
    [Google Scholar]
19. “Required Syllabus Item: Academic Integrity Policy.” Penn State College of Health and Human Services, http://hhd.psu.edu/policies-and-procedures/requiredsyllabus-item-academic-integrity-policyAccessed 5 Aug. 2017
20. Rivard Ry. “Turning on Turnitin.” Inside Higher Ed, 16April 2013, www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/04/16/writing-professors-questionplagiarism-detection-software
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schneider Alison. “Adjunct Says Pursuit of Alleged Plagiarist Cost Him His Job at Fordham U.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12June 1998
    [Google Scholar]
22. 2013 Resolutions & Sense of the House Motions, Conference on College Composition and Communication, 16Mar 2013, http://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resolutions/2013.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Walker John. “Measuring Plagiarism: Researching What Students Do, Not What They Say They Do.” Studies in Higher Education, vol.35, no.1 2010, pp. 41–59
    [Google Scholar]
24. Young Loye. “Is Humiliation an Ethically Appropriate Response to Plagiarism?” AdjunctNation, 1Nov 2008, https://www.adjunctnation.com/2008/11/01/64-ishumiliation-an-ethically-appropriate-response-to-plagiarism/
    [Google Scholar]
25. Zwagerman Sean. “The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, Panopticism, and the Rhetoric of Academic Integrity.” College Composition and Communication, vol.59, no.4, July 2008, pp. 676–710
    [Google Scholar]
26. Allan Elizabeth G., Dana Lynn Driscoll. “The Three-Fold Benefit of Reflective Writing: Improving Program Assessment, Student Learning, and Faculty Professional Development.” Assessing Writing, vol.21 2014, pp. 37–55
    [Google Scholar]
27. American Association of University Professors. 1915 Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Anson Chris M, Richard Jewell. “Shadows of the Mountain.” Schell and Stock pp. 47–75
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bentley Erinn. Professional Learning Communities and First-Year Composition Instructors 2011 Western Michigan University, dissertation, http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/323
    [Google Scholar]
30. Bilia Angela. et al. “Forum on Identity.” College English, vol.73, no.4 2011, pp. 379–95
    [Google Scholar]
31. Clausen JanEva-Maria Swidler . “Academic Freedom from Below: Toward an Adjunct-Centered Struggle.” Journal of Academic Freedom, vol.4 2013, pp. 1–26. http://aaup.org/reports-publications/journal-academic-freedom
    [Google Scholar]
32. Colby Richard, Rebekah Shulz Colby . “Real Faculty but Not: The Full-Time, Non-Tenure-Track Position as Contingent Labor.” Seth Kahn et al. pp. 57–70
    [Google Scholar]
33. Dewey John. “Academic Freedom.” Educational Review, vol.23 Jan 1902, pp. 1–14
    [Google Scholar]
34. Donhardt TracySarah Layden . “Adjuncts Fostering Change: Improving Adjunct Working Conditions by Forming an Associate Faculty Coalition (AFC).” Kahn et al. pp. 183–97
    [Google Scholar]
35. Finkin Matthew WRobert C. Post . For the Common Good: Principles of American Academic Freedom, Yale UP 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gladstein JillBrandon Post . The National Census of Writing 2013 writingcensus, http://swarthmore.edu.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hendricks Bill. “Working Alone Together: Labor Agency and Professional Exchange in the Teaching of Composition.” Pedagogy, vol.9, no.2 Spr. 2009, pp. 235–60
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kahn Seth. “Bad Idea about Writing: Anybody Can Teach It.” Inside Higher Ed, 07Aug 2017, http://insidehighered.com/views/2017/08/07/colleges-should-hire-writinginstructors-right-experience-and-expertise-and-give.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kahn Seth., et al. “Introduction: Paths towards Solidarity” Kahn et al. pp. 3–11
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kahn Seth. Contingency, Exploitation, and Solidarity: Labor and Action in English Composition, he WAC Clearinghouse/UP Colorado 2017, http://wac.colo state.edu/books/contingency
    [Google Scholar]
41. Marshall Margaret J. Contesting Cultural Rhetorics: Public Discourse and Education, 1890–1900, U of Michigan P 1995
    [Google Scholar]
42. Matthews Jessica. “Re: Follow up on CWPA PLC Panel.” Received by Alexis Teagarden 11Sept 22017
    [Google Scholar]
43. Matthews Jessica, et al. “Learning Communities: Leveraging External Funding for Faculty-Driven Professional Development.” College Composition and Communication, Solving Problems Together: Agency and Advocacy in an Age of Austerity, Council of Writing Program Administrators Conference 21July 2017 U Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Micciche Laura R. “For Slow Agency.” Writing Program Administration, vol.35, no.1 2011, pp. 73–90. http:// wpacouncil.org/archives/35n1/35n1micciche.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Murphy Michael. “New Faculty for a New University: Toward a Full-Time Teaching Intensive Faculty Track in Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol.52, no.1 2000, pp. 14–42
    [Google Scholar]
46. Murphy Michael. “Head to Head with EDX?: Toward a New Rhetoric for Academic Labor.” Kahn et al. pp. 71–89
    [Google Scholar]
47. Nagelhout Ed. “Faculty Development as Working Condition.” Forum, vol.11, no.1 2007, pp. A14–16
    [Google Scholar]
48. Nelson Cary. No University Is an Island: Saving Academic Freedom, New York UP 2010
    [Google Scholar]
49. Penrose Ann M. “Professional Identity in a Contingent-Labor Profession: Expertise, Autonomy, Community in Composition Teaching.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol.35, no.2 2012, pp. 108–26. http://wpacouncil.org/ archives/35n2/35n2penrose.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Popp Jacquelynn SSusan RGoldman . “Knowledge Building in Teacher Professional Learning Communities: Focus of Meeting Matters.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.59 2016, pp. 347–59
    [Google Scholar]
51. Zwagerman Sean. “The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, Panopticism, and the Rhetoric of Academic Integrity.” College Composition and Communication, vol.59, no.4, July 2008, pp. 676–710
    [Google Scholar]
52. Russell David, et al. “From Learning Communities to Professional Communities: Negotiating Identities through Research-Based Bizcomm Program Redesign.” Risk and Reward, College Composition and Communication Conference, 1919 2015, pp. 676–710. Tampa Convention Center, Tampa, FL. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schell Eileen E. Patricia Lambert Stock. . “Working Contingent Faculty in[to] Higher Education.” Schell and Stock pp. 1–46
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schell Eileen E. Patricia Lambert Stock. . Moving a Mountain: Transforming the Role of Contingent Faculty in Composition Studies and Higher Education, NCTE 2001
    [Google Scholar]
55. Vescio, Vicki, et al. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.24 2008, pp. 80–91
    [Google Scholar]
56. Yancey Kathleen. “The Teaching Circle, the WPA, and Writing in the University.” Kitchen Cooks, Plate Twirlers, and Troubadours: Writing Program Administrators Tell Their Stories, edited by Diana George, Boynton/Cook 1999, pp. 129–77
    [Google Scholar]
57. Yoo Laura, et al. “Theory, Practice … Talk and Snacks: How One Faculty Professional Learning Community Discovered Action through Collaboration.” Writing Strategies for Action, College Composition and Communication Conference,, 9Apr 2016, pp. 129–77. Hilton Americas, Houston, TX. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]
58. BenjaminErnst. “How Over-Reliance on Contingent Appointments Diminishes Faculty Involvement in Student Learning.” Association of American Colleges and Universities, vol. 5 1Fall2002, https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/ periodicals/how-over-reliance-contingent-appointments-diminishes-faculty.
    [Google Scholar]
59. FreemanH. R. “Student Evaluations of College Instructors: Effects of Type of Course Taught, Instructor Gender and Gender Role, and Student Gender.” Journal of Educational Psychology,86 1994, pp.627–30.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Jacoby Daniel. “Effects of Part-Time Faculty Employment on Community College Graduation Rates.” The Journal of Higher Education,7766 2006, pp.1081–103.
    [Google Scholar]
61. LangenJill M. “Evaluation of Adjunct Faculty in Higher Education Institutions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education362 2011, pp.185–96.
    [Google Scholar]
62. MarshH. WRoche L. A. “Making Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Effective: The Critical Issues of Validity, Bias, and Utility.” American Psychologist,521977, pp.1187–97.
    [Google Scholar]
63. RadmacherS. A.Martin D. J. “Identifying Significant Predictors of Student Evaluations of Faculty through Hierarchical Regression Analysis.” The Journal of Psychology,1352001, pp.259–68.
    [Google Scholar]
64. RinioloTodd C., et al. “Hot or Not: Do Professors Perceived as Physically Attractive Receive Higher Student Evaluations?” The Journal of General Psychology,1851 2006, pp.19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Stark Philip B.Richard Freishtat. “An Evaluation of Course Evaluations.” Science Open Research 2014.10.14293/S2199‑1006.1.SOR‑EDU.AOFRQA.v1.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Trout Paul. “Deconstructing an Evaluation Form.” The Montana Professor, vol. 8, no. 3 Fall1998.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wieman CarlSarah Gilbert. “The Teaching Practices Inventory: A New Tool for Characterizing College and University Teaching in Mathematics and Science.” CBE-Life Sciences Education,133 2014, pp.552–69.
    [Google Scholar]