Skip to content
2018
Volume 46, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0098-6291
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2356

Abstract

Despite community college teachers teaching nearly 50 percent of all first-year composition, our experiences and hands-on knowledge are not viewed as scholarly contributions to writing studies. The scholarship of writing studies needs to be expanded through redefining what constitutes scholarly work as well as providing mentoring to two-year faculty who possess critical knowledge on composition and pedagogy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc201829948
2018-12-01
2025-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andelora Jeffrey. “Forging a National Identity.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.35, no.4, May 2008, pp. 350–62. www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/TETYC/0354-may08/TE0354 Forging.pdfAccessed 2 Apr. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andelora Jeffrey. “The Teacher/Scholar: Reconstructing Our Professional Identity in Two-Year Colleges.” Sullivan and Toth pp. 579–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzaldúa Gloria. Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza. 2nd ed., Aunt Lute Books 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzaldúa Gloria. “Creative Writing and Social Action.” Spring 2001 Florida Atlantic U Boca Raton. Lecture
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartholomae David. “Inventing the University.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.5, no.1 1986, wac.colostate.edu/jbw/v5n1/bartholomae.pdfAccessed 10 Jan 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhabha Homi. The Location of Culture. Routledge 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard UP 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bredillet Christophe. et al. “Reconnecting Theory and Practice in a Pluralistic Organizing Context: Issues and Aristotelian Considerations.” European Academy of Management Conference 2014, eprints.qut.edu.au/71893/1/10168-Reconnecting_theory_and_practice_in_a_pluralistic_organizing_context_Issues_and_Aristotelian_considerations.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cixous Helene. et al. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs, vol.1, no.4, Summer 1976, pp. 875–93. JSTOR artandobjecthood.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/cixous_the_laugh_of_the_medusa.pdfAccessed 27 June 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark Burton R. “The ‘Cooling-Out’ Function in Higher Education.” American Journal of Sociology, vol.65, no.6, May 1960, pp. 569–76. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/2773649Accessed 27 June 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen Arthur M., Brawer Florence B. The American Community College.. 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins Patricia. Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. U of Minnesota P 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. “Community College FAQs.” Community College Research Center., ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Community-College-FAQs.htmlAccessed 20 Jan. 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Costello Lisa A. “Standing Up and Standing Together: Feminist Teaching and Collaborative Mentoring.” Feminist Teacher, vol.26, no.1, June 2015, pp. 1–28. Academic Search Complete db26.linccweb.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122687133&site=ehost-liveAccessed 19 January 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Downs Douglas, Wardle Elizabeth. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College Composition and Communication, vol.58, no.4 2007, pp. 552–84. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/20456966Accessed 1 Jan. 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fulkerson Richard. “The Epistemic Paradoxes of ‘Lore’: From the Making of Knowledge in Composition to the Present (Almost).” The Change of Knowledge in Composition: Contemporary Perspectives. Massey Lance, Gebhardt Richard C. Utah State UP 2011, pp. 47–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haraway Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harding Sandra. “Comment on Heckman’s ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Revisited: Whose Standpoint Needs the Regimes of Truth and Reality?’” Signs, vol.22, no.2 1997, pp. 382–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harkin Patricia. “The Postdisciplinary Politics of Lore.” Contending with Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age. Harkin Patricia, Schilb John. Modern Language Association 1991, pp. 124–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hartsock Nancy. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Westview 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hassel Holly, Giordano Joanne Baird. “Occupy Writing Studies: Rethinking College Composition for the Needs of the Teaching Majority.” College Composition and Communication, vol.65, no.1, Sept. 2013, pp. 117–39. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/43490809Accessed 19 Mar. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Idrus Faizah. “Examining Classroom Transformational Spaces Using the Third Space Theory in Developing Students’ Sense of Shared Identity.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol.5, no.1, Jan. 2015, pp. 28–37 Education Source 10.17507/Tpls.0501.04.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Janack Marianne. “‘Standpoint Epistemology without the ‘Standpoint’? An Examination of Epistemic Privilege and Epistemic Authority.” Hypatia, vol.12, no.2, Spring 1997, pp. 125–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Janus Chris. “Re: Four-Question Request.” Larson Holly. 13January 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jensen Darin. “Tilting at Windmills: Refiguring Graduate Education in English to Prepare Future Two-Year College Professionals.” PhD diss. U of Nebraska–Lincoln 2017, digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1144&context=englishdissAccessed 27 June 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jensen Darin, Ely Susan. “A Partnership Teaching Externship Program: A Model That Makes Do.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.44, no.3, Mar. 2017, pp. 247–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kellen Kathleen. “Re: One Last Thought . . . (Split between Theory and Practice).” Larson Holly. 7Mar. 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lancaster Zac. “Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templates in “They Say/I Say.College Composition and Communication, vol.67, no.3 2016, pp. 437–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Launius Christie, Hassel Holly. Threshold Concepts in Women’s and Gender Studies.. 2nd ed., Routledge 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lewiecki-Wilson Cynthia, Sommers Jeff. “Professing at the Fault Lines: Composition at Open Admissions Institutions.” College Composition and Communication, vol.50, no.3, Feb. 1999, pp. 438–62. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/358860Accessed 19 Mar. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mauk Johnathan. “Location, Location, Location: The ‘Real’ (E)states of Being, Writing, and Thinking in Composition.” College English, vol.65, no.4, Mar. 2003, pp. 368–88. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/3594240Accessed 19Mar. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  32. North Stephen. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Boynton/Cook 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Popken Randall. “Edwin Hopkins and the Costly Labor of Composition Teaching.” College Composition and Communication, vol.55, no.4, June 2004, pp. 618–64. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/4140665Accessed 19 Mar. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Reynolds Mark. “Two-Year College Teachers as Knowledge Makers.” Sullivan and Toth pp. 139–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stenberg Shari. Repurposing Composition: Feminist Interventions for a Neoliberal Age. UP of Colorado 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sullivan Patrick. “The Two-Year College Teacher-Scholar-Activist.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.42, no.4, May 2015, pp. 327–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sullivan Patrick. “What Is ‘College-Level’ Writing?” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.30, no.4, May 2003, pp. 374–90 National Council of Teachers of English www.ncte.org/journals/tetyc/issues/v30-4Accessed 17 Mar. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sullivan Patrick M., Toth Christie eds. Teaching Composition at the Two-Year College: Background Readings. Bedford/St. Martin’s 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tinberg Howard. “Community College Teachers as Border Crossers.” Sullivan and Toth pp. 334–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Toth Christina M., Griffiths Brent M., Thirolf Kathryn. “‘Distinct and Significant’: Professional Identities of Two-Year College English Faculty.” College Composition and Communication, vol.65, no.1, Sept. 2012, pp. 90–116. JSTOR www.jstor.org/stable/43490808?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsAccessed 2 Apr. 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Toth Christie, Sullivan Patrick. “Toward Local Teacher-Scholar Communities of Practice: Findings from a National TYCA Survey.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.43, no.3, Mar. 2016, pp. 247–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Two-Year College English Association. TYCA Guidelines for Preparing Teachers of English in the Two-Year College. National Council of Teachers of English, www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Groups/TYCA/GuidelinesPrep2YCEngFac_REVISED.pdfAccessed 20 Jan. 2018
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/tetyc201829948
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error