Feature: Class Size and First-Year Writing: Exploring the Effects on Pedagogy and Student Perception of Writing Process

References

1. AriasJ. J., and WalkerDouglas M.. “Additional Evidence on the Relationship between Class Size and Student Performance.” Journal of Economic Education, vol.35, no.4 2004, pp. 311–29. Education Research Complete.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BeattieIrene R., and ThieleMegan. “Connecting in Class? College Class Size and Inequality in Academic Social Capital.” The Journal of Higher Education, vol.87, no.3, May/June 2016, pp. 332–62. Project Muse, muse.jhu.edu/article/612674.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BedardKelly, and KuhnPeter. “Where Class Size Really Matters: Class Size and Student Ratings of Instructor Effectiveness.” Economics of Education Review, vol.27, no.3, June 2008, pp. 253–65. ERIC, eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ794643.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BelanoffPat.. “The Myths of Assessment.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol.10, no.1 1991, pp. 54–66. wac.colostate.edu/jbw/v10n1/belanoff.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BiddleBruce, and BerlinerDavid. “A Research Synthesis/Unequal School Funding in the United States.” Educational Leadership, vol.59, no.8, May 2002, pp. 48–59. ERIC, eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ644983.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Canadian Education Association.. “The Facts on Education: Do Smaller Class Sizes Improve Learning?” Ontario Institute for Studies in Education 2010, www.edcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/cea-2010-foe-class-size.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChapmanLauren, and LudlowLarry. “Can Downsizing College Class Sizes Augment Student Outcomes? An Investigation of the Effects of Class Size on Student Learning.” JGE: The Journal of General Education, vol.59, no.2, Apr. 2010, pp. 105–23.
   [Google Scholar]
8. “Class Size Reduction: A Proven Reform Strategy.” National Education Association 2008, www.nea.org/assets/docs/PB08_ClassSize08.pdf.html.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Council of Writing Program Administrators. “WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0).” WPA Council, 17July 2014, wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CuseoJoe.. “The Empirical Case against Large Class Size: Adverse Effects on the Teaching, Learning, and Retention of First-Year Students.” Journal of Faculty Development, vol.21, no.1, Jan. 2007, pp. 1–22. ERIC, eric.ed.gov/?id= EJ774391.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De PaolaMaria, et al. “Class Size Effects on Student Achievement: Heterogeneity Across Abilities and Fields.” Education Economics, vol.21, no.2 2013, pp. 135–53. ERIC, eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ995693.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DownsDoug, and RobertsonLianne. “Threshold Concepts in First-Year Composition.” Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies edited by Adler-KassnerLinda and WardleElizabeth. University Press of Colorado 2015, pp. 105–21.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GeorgeDiana.. “Working with Peer Groups in the Composition Classroom.” College Composition and Communication, vol.35, no.3 1984, pp. 320–26.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GlauGreg.. “ASU Class Size Presentation.” CompFAQs, July 2006, compfaqs.org/Workload/ASUClassSizePresentation.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HasselHolly, and GiordanoJoanne. “FYC Placement at Open-Admission, Two-Year Campuses: Changing Campus Culture, Institutional Practice, and Student Success.” Open Words: Access and English Studies, vol.5, no.2 2011, pp. 29–59. Pearson www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/Hassel-and-Giordano-Open_Words-Fall_2011-4.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HaswellRichard.. “Class Sizes for First-Year Regular and Basic Writing Courses: Data Collected from the WPA-L, 1998–1999, 2003–2004.” 2Dec. 2004, comppile.tamucc.edu/classsize.htm.
17. HorningAlice.. “The Definitive Article on Class Size.” Writing Program Administration, vol.31, no.1 2007, pp. 11–34. www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/31n1-2horning.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HuotBrian.. “Toward a New Theory of Writing Assessment.” College Composition and Communication, vol.47, no.4 1996, pp. 549–66. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=usupress_pubs.
    [Google Scholar]
19. “Increasing Student Success: Smaller Classes, Innovative Pedagogy at UCF [University of Central Florida].” Association of American Colleges and Universities News, June-July 2010, www.aacu.org/campus-model/increasing-student-success-smaller-classes-innovative-pedagogy-ucf.
    [Google Scholar]
20. “Interesting Piece on Feedback in Student Writing.” WPA Listserv, February 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
21. JohnsonIryna Y.. “Class Size and Student Performance at a Public Research University: A Cross-Classified Model.” Research in Higher Education, vol.51, no.8 2010, pp. 701–23. Springer, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11162-010-9179-y.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KentThomas.. Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction, Bucknell UP 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
23. KentThomas.. Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing Process Paradigm, Southern Illinois UP 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
24. KnightWilliam E., and OH Regional Campuses, Office of Academic Assessment and Evaluation Services.. Kent State U.. The Effect of Class Size in English 10000: “Introduction to College English” on Student Grades in English 10001: “College English I” in the Kent State University Regional Campuses, 1Aug. 1991 EBSCOhost.
    [Google Scholar]
25. KokkelenbergEdward C., et al. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Grades at a Public University.” Economics of Education Review, vol.27, no.2 2008 Mar. 2005 pp. 221–33. Digital Commons Cornell University, digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=intlvf.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LazearEdward.. “Educational Production.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.116 2001, pp. 777–803. National Bureau of Economic Research www.nber.org/papers/w7349.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LeeMelanie.. “Rhetorical Roulette: Does Writing-Faculty Overload Disable Effective Response to Student Writing?” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.37, no.2, Dec. 2009, pp. 165–77. www.ncte.org/journals/tetyc/issues/v37-2.
    [Google Scholar]
28. LotkowskiVeronica A., et al.The Role of Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention, ACT policy report 2004 ERIC files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485476.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
29. LynchPaul.. After Pedagogy: The Experience of Teaching, National Council of Teachers of English 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MacArthurCharles A., and GrahamSteve. “Writing Research from a Cognitive Perspective.” ArthurC. A., GrahamS., & FitzgeraldJ. Eds. Handbook of Writing Research. 2nd ed. Edited by MacArthurCharles, et al.Guilford 2016, pp. 24–40.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McClennyKay, et al. “Student Engagement and Student Outcomes: Key Findings from CCSSE Validation Research.” Community College Survey of Student Engagement, Community College Leadership Program, University of Texas, www.ccsse.org/aboutsurvey/docs/CCSSE%20Validation%20Summary.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MedinaJennifer.. “California Cuts Threaten the Status of Universities.” New York Times, 1June 2012, www.nytimes.com/2012/06/02/us/california-cuts-threaten-the-status-of-universities.html.
    [Google Scholar]
33. MilesMatthew B. and HubermanMichael A.. Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
34. MillerSusan K.. “Using Group Conferences to Respond to Essays in Progress.” Strategies for Teaching First-Year Composition edited by RoenDuane, et al.National Council of Teachers of English 2002, pp. 291–310.
    [Google Scholar]
35. MonksJ., and SchmidtR.. “The Impact of Class Size and Number of Students on Outcomes in Higher Education.” Digital Commons, Cornell University 2010, digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1145&context=workingpapers.
    [Google Scholar]
36. MorrisWilliam, et al. “An Analysis of Writing Assessment Books Published before and after the Year 2000.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, vol.43, no.2 2015, pp. 118–40.
    [Google Scholar]
37. “NCTE Beliefs about the Teaching of Writing.” National Council of Teachers of English, Nov. 2004, wrd.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/NCTE%20Beliefs%20about%20the%20Teaching%20of%20Writing.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
38. NettesheimGregg.. “Re: First-Generation Students.” Received by Greg Ahrenhoerster, 14Nov. 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
39. O’NeillPeggy, et al. “Defining Assessment as Research: Moving from Obligations to Opportunities.” Writing Program Administration, vol.26 1-2 2002, pp. 10–26. www.wpacouncil.org/archives/26n1-2/26n1-2oneill.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
40. PascarellaErnest T., and TerenziniPatrick T.. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, Jossey-Bass 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
41. PatonFiona.. “Approaches to Productive Peer Review.” Strategies for Teaching First-Year Composition edited by RosenDuane, et al.National Council of Teachers of English 2002, pp. 290–300.
    [Google Scholar]
42. PhillipsCassandra, and AhrenhoersterGreg. “The Scholarship of Assessment: Increasing Agency and Collaboration through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Assessment in the Disciplines, vol. 4: Assessment of Writing edited by ParettiMarie C. and PowellKatrina M.. Association for Institutional Research 2009, pp. 85–106.
    [Google Scholar]
43. PopkenRandall.. “The WPA as Publishing Scholar: Edwin Hopkins and the Labor and Cost of the Teaching of English.” Historical Studies of Writing Program Administration: Individuals, Communities, and the Formation of a Discipline edited by L’EplattenierBarbara and MastrangeloLisa. Parlour P 2004, pp. 5–22.
    [Google Scholar]
44. “Principles for the Postsecondary Teaching of Writing.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, Mar. 2015, cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/postsecondarywriting.
    [Google Scholar]
45. SapelliC., and IllanesG.. “Class Size and Teacher Effects in Higher Education.” Economics of Education Review, vol.52 2016, pp. 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.01.001.
    [Google Scholar]
46. SchanzenbachDiane Whitmore.. “Does Class Size Matter?” National Education Policy Center, Feb. 2014, www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Schanzenbach_ClassSize.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
47. ScottTony, and WelchNancy. Composition in the Age of Austerity, UP of Colorado 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
48. SommersNancy, and SaltzLaura. “The Novice as Expert: Writing the Freshman Year.” College Composition and Communication, vol.56, no.1 2002, pp. 253–60. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4140684?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
    [Google Scholar]
49. “Statement on Working Conditions for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, Apr. 2016, cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/working-conditions-ntt.
    [Google Scholar]
50. StraussValerie.. “Class Size Matters a Lot, Research Shows.” Washington Post, 24Feb. 2014, www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/02/24/class-size-matters-a-lot-research-shows/?utm_term=.8a7feb6bdedd.
    [Google Scholar]
51. TheobaldBen.. “Undergraduate Class Size Increase Due to Budget Cuts.” Iowa State Daily, 30Jan. 2011, www.iowastatedaily.com/news/article_244311d6-2cb6-11e0-9067-001cc4c03286.html.
    [Google Scholar]
52. TintoVincent.. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed., U of Chicago P 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
53. UW Colleges English Department.. English Department Program Review, University of Wisconsin Colleges 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
54. UW Colleges Fact Book.. University of Wisconsin Colleges 2014, uwc.edu/about/overview/factbook.
    [Google Scholar]
55. YanceyKathleen Blake.. Reflection in the Writing Classroom, Utah State UP 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
56. YanceyKathleen Blake, et al.Writing Across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing, Utah State UP 2014.
    [Google Scholar]