Skip to content
2018
Volume 60, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

vigilante civic literacies,

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025602189
2025-11-01
2026-02-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 60 Minutes (2022, May3). Birds Aren’t Real: The conspiracy theory that satirizes conspiracy theories [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsgnrYog6W0
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfonseca K. (2023, October2). School culture wars push students to form banned book clubs, anti-censorship groups. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/school-culture-wars-push-students-form-banned-book/story?id=103377259
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfonsi S. (2022, May1). Parodying conspiracy theories with the Birds Aren’t Real movement. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/birds-arent-real-peter-mcindoe-60-minutes-2022-05-01/
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Amarasingam A., & Argentino M.-A. (2020) The QAnon conspiracy theory: A security threat in the making?CTC Sentinel, 13(7), 37–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson J., & Kincaid A. D. (2013) Media subservience and satirical subversiveness: The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, the propaganda model and the paradox of parody. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(3), 171–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arkin D., & Popken B. (2018, February21). How the internet’s conspiracy theorists turned Parkland students into “crisis actors.”NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/how-internet-s-conspiracy-theorists-turned-parkland-students-crisis-actors-n849921
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Asimow M. (2022) American vigilantism: Popular justice and popular culture. In Robson P. & Spina F. (Eds.), Vigilante justice in society and popular culture (pp. 27–50). Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ballard C., Goldstein I., Mehta P., Smothers G., Take K., Zhong V., Greenstadt R., Lauinger T., & McCoy D. (2022) Conspiracy brokers: Understanding the monetization of YouTube conspiracy theories. WWW ’22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. ACM Digital Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beach R., Enciso P., Harste J., Jenkins C., Raina S. A., Rogers R., Short K. G., Sung Y. K., Wilson M., & Yenika-Agbaw V. (2009) Exploring the “critical” in critical content analysis of children’s literature. 58th yearbook of the National Reading Council (pp. 129–143). Literacy Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bengtsson M. (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benkler Y., Tilton C., Etling B., Roberts H., Clark J., Faris R., Kaiser J., & Schmitt C. (2020) Mail-in voter fraud: Anatomy of a disinformation campaign.Berkman Klein Center. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3703701
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Birds Aren’t Real (2019, November11). CIA agent confesses to bird drone surveillance[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtubecom/watch?v=l30_APBNPXg
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Birds Aren’t Real [@birdsarentreal] (2020, November26). Thanksgiving is a bird brainwashing ceremony. Don’t be fooled. [Post]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CID3RTVAmTC/?hl=en
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Birds Aren’t Real [@birdsarentreal] (2022a, September14). When you start asking questions everything starts to unravel. [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@birdsarentreal/video/7143406114271530286
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Birds Aren’t Real [@birdsarentreal] (2022b, September15). Realizing our @Lyft driver Mark is a high-level target[Video].
    [Google Scholar]
  17. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@birdsarentreal/video/7143636868096199979
  18. Birds Aren’t Real [@birdsarentreal] (2023a, March20). It would only take 100 of us to bring the real truth to the truth app![Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@birdsarentreal/video/7212742626565524779
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Birds Aren’t Real [@birdsarentreal] (2023b, April15). you all called us crazy and we will never forget[Post]. X. https://x.com/birdsarentreal/status/1647368763740659713
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bond B. E., & Neville-Shepard R. (2023) The rise of presidential eschatology: Conspiracy theories, religion, and the January 6th insurrection. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(5), 681–696.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Boromé J. A. (1968) The Vigilant Committee of Philadelphia. Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 92(3), 320–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Borsheim-Black C., & Sarigianides S. T. (2019) Letting go of literary Whiteness: Antiracist literature instruction for White students. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Boyd D. (2014) It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Braun V., & Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brotherton R. (2015) Suspicious minds: Why we believe conspiracy theories. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Brumbelow A. B. (2023) Reverse-engineering conspiracy theories: A critical media literacy approach to mis- and disinformation. English Journal, 113(2), 74–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Campbell S. W. (2012) The slave catchers: Enforcement of the fugitive slave law, 1850–1860. University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Clayworth J. (2024, March19). Iowa is a book ban hotspot. Axios Des Moines. https://www.axios.com/local/des-moines/2024/03/19/iowa-book-ban-hotspot-desmoines-conservative-parents
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Colbert S. (Writer & Host) (2005, October17). [Season 1, Episode 1][TV series episode]. In Stewart J. (Executive Producer), The Colbert Report. Comedy Central.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Duffy B. E., Poell T., & Nieborg D. B. (2019) Platform practices in the cultural industries: Creativity, labor, and citizenship. Social Media + Society, 5(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ekman M. (2022) The great replacement: Strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence, 28(4), 1127–1143.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Eio S., & Kyngäs H. (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Engle J. (2021, December15). Lesson of the day: “Birds aren’t real, or are they? Inside a Gen Z conspiracy theory.”The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/15/learning/lesson-plans/lesson-of-the-day-birds-arent-real-or-are-they-inside-a-gen-z-conspiracy-theory.html
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fereday J., & Muir-Cochrane E. (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fife S. T., & Gossner J. D. (2024) Deductive qualitative analysis: Evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Frankfurt H. G. (2006) On truth. Alfred A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fraser N. (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fujii L. A. (2013) The puzzle of extra-lethal violence. Perspectives on Politics, 11(2), 410–426.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Garcia A., & Mirra N. (2021) Writing toward justice: Youth speculative civic literacies in online policy discourse. Urban Education, 56(4), 640–669.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gee J. P. (2004) Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Gillespie T. (2010) The politics of “platforms.”New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gutiérrez K. D., & Jurow A. S. (2016) Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Haas N. E., de Keijser J. W., & Bruinsma G. J. (2012) Public support for vigilantism: An experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 387–413.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Habermas J. (1991) The structural transformations of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (Burger T., Trans.). The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hillstrom L. C. (2019) The #MeToo movement. ABC-CLIO.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Horeck T. (2019) Justice on demand: True crime in the digital streaming era. Wayne State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hunting K. (2021) Critical content analysis: A methodological proposal for the incorporation of numerical data into critical/cultural media studies. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(1), 39–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jenkins H., Ito M., & Boyd D. (2016) Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Jesse Watters Primetime (2023, August18). This is a “birdemic”: Peter McIndoe [Video]. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6334455740112
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kendzior S. (2022) They knew: How a culture of conspiracy keeps America complacent (1st ed.). Flatiron Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kessler G., Rizzo S., & Kelly M. (2021, January24). Trump’s false or misleading claims total 30,573 over 4 years. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Krippendorff K. (2018) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lorenz T. (2021, December9). Birds aren’t real, or are they? Inside a Gen Z conspiracy theory. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/09/technology/birds-arent-real-gen-z-misinformation.html
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Low D. E. (2024) Transgressive humor in classrooms: Punching up, punching down, and critical literacy practices (1st ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Mirra N., & Garcia A. (2020) “I hesitate but I do have hope”: Youth speculative civic literacies for troubled times. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 295–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mirra N., & Garcia A. (2022) Guns, schools, and democracy: Adolescents imagining social futures through speculative civic literacies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 345–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Moncada E. (2017) Varieties of vigilantism: Conceptual discord, meaning and strategies. Global Crime, 18(4), 403–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Montag R. (2017, August14). Name that Nazi: Social media as an identification tool. The Jerusalem Post. https://www.jpost.com/international/identify-this-nazi-social-media-as-a-tool-to-remove-anonymity-502374
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Myrtou N., & Poulakidakos S. (2022) Vigilantism: The Greek approach. In Robson P. & Spina F. (Eds.), Vigilante justice in society and popular culture (pp. 157–180). Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social features. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Nichols T. P., & LeBlanc R. J. (2021) Media education and the limits of “literacy”: Ecological orientations to performative platforms. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(4), 389–412.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Nieborg D. B., & Poell T. (2018) The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. O’Connor C., & Weatherall J. O. (2019) The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rainie L., Keeter S., & Perrin A. (2019, July22). Trust and distrust in America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/07/22/trust-and-distrust-in-america/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rister C. C. (1933) Outlaws and vigilantes of the southern plains, 1865-1885. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 19(4), 537–554.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Robinson B., & Fassbender W. J. (2023) Homo medialiteratus and the media literacy proxy war: Mapping the U.S. response to digital dismisinfo. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(4), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2234286
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Ronson J. (2015, February12). How one stupid tweet blew up Justine Sacco’s life. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sachdeva D. E., Kimmel S. C., & Chérres J. S. (2023) “It’s bigger than just a book challenge”: A collective case study of educators’ experiences with censorship. Teachers College Record, 125(6), 30–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Savage C., Goldman A., Kessel J. M. (2021, October21). Analyst who reported the infamous Trump tape rumor wants to clear his name. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/us/politics/igor-danchenko-steele-dossier.html
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Schnell T., Viviani R., Lenz C., & Krampe H. (2024) When alienated from society, conspiracy theory belief gives meaning to life. Heliyon, 10(14), Article e34557.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Short K. G. (2019) Critical content analysis of visual images. In Johnson H., Mathis J., & Short K. G. (Eds.), Critical content analysis of visual images in books for young people: Reading images (1st ed., pp. 3–22). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Shrodes A. (2021) Humor as political possibility: Critical media literacy in LGBTQ+ participatory cultures. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(4), 855–876.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Stevens K. (2022, April5). Lesson plan: An experiment in misinformation. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/classroom/lesson-plans/2022/04/lesson-plan-an-experiment-in-misinformation
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Stubenvoll M., Heiss R., & Matthes J. (2021) Media trust under threat: Antecedents and consequences of misinformation perceptions on social media. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 2765–2786.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. TED (2023, September13). Birds aren’t real? How a conspiracy takes flight | Peter McIndoe [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VEkzweBJPM
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Trottier D. (2020) Denunciation and doxing: Towards a conceptual model of digital vigilantism. Global Crime, 21(3-4), 196–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. U/IAMADP (2022, April29). That’s a crisis actor [Online forum post]. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/BirdsArentReal/comments/uef1ui/eagle_crashes_through_car_window/
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Vasist P. N., Chatterjee D., & Krishnan S. (2024) The polarizing impact of political disinformation and hate speech: A crosscountry configural narrative. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10390-w
    [Google Scholar]
  79. VICE (2022, January9). The truth behind “Birds Aren’t Real” | My Life Online[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK1dXuMEpT0
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Warner M. (2002) Publics and counterpublics. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Williams Z. (2022, April14). “The lunacy is getting more intense”: How Birds Aren’t Real took on the conspiracy theorists. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/14/the-lunacy-is-getting-more-intense-how-birds-arent-real-took-on-the-conspiracy-theorists
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025602189
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025602189
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test