Skip to content
2018
Volume 59, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

In this study, we examine educators’ orientations to the teaching of “standardized English” (SE)—an idealized form often associated with academic and professional contexts. The perceived status of SE is reinforced by normative standard language ideologies and is often oriented as “correct” and necessary for success in education and employment. SE is also a primary focus in English language arts (ELA) classrooms, with educators often positioned as gatekeepers. In this study, we analyze discussion posts from 91 educators enrolled in an online master’s level sociolinguistics course in which they describe how they would define SE for their students. Through iterative, multi-level qualitative collaborative coding of participants’ discussion posts, we interpret six ideological orientations to SE, ranging from standard language ideology to critical language awareness, with varying degrees of acceptance of linguistic diversity and criticality regarding societal sociolinguistic power relations. Importantly, we discuss the messiness of language ideologies, especially as they pertain to ELA. This study highlights the prevalence of hybrid orientations to SE, indicating that educators’ views on SE are complex and often integrate multiple, sometimes conflicting, language ideologies. We argue for the need for teacher preparation and continuing education programs to address language ideologies, promoting strategies that go beyond respecting linguistic diversity to challenging standard language norms as inroads toward dismantling raciolinguistic and colonial legacies in English language education.

© 2025 by the National Council of Teachers of English
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025594413
2025-05-01
2026-06-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, C., Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (2007) Dialects in schools and communities. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alim, H. S. (2010) Critical language awareness. In Hornberger N. & McKay S., (Eds.) Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 205–231). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, K. T., Chang-Bacon, C., & Guzmán Antelo, M. (2024) Navigating monolingual language ideologies: Educators’ “Yes, BUT” objections to linguistically sustaining pedagogies in the classroom. International Journal of Bilingualism, 28(4), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241236682
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, K. T., Rodriguez-Martinez, S., & Yoon, S. S. (2024) Educators’ stancetaking on standardized English: From prescriptivist to critically conscious and somewhere in-between. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2299696
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ball, A., & Ladson-Billings, G. (2020) Educating teachers for the 21st century: Culture, reflection, and learning. In Nasir N., Lee C., Pea R., & McKinney de Royston M. (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 387–403). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ball, A., & Lardner, T. (1997) Dispositions toward literacy: Constructs of teacher knowledge and the Ann Arbor Black English case. College Composition & Communication, 48(4), 469–485.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Banes, L., Martinez, D., Athanases, S., & Wong, J. (2016) Self-reflexive inquiry into language use and beliefs: Toward more expansive language ideologies. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1185906
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernstein, K., Katznelson, N., Amezcua, A., Mohamed, S., & Alvarado, S. (2020) Equity/social justice, instrumentalism/neoliberalism: Dueling discourses of dual language in principals’ talk about their programs. TESOL Quarterly, 54(3), 652–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.582
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Canagarajah, A. (2013) Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 40–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang-Bacon, C. (2020) “It’s not really my job”: A mixed methods framework for language ideologies, monolingualism, and teaching emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118783188
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruz, J., & Anderson, K. T. (2024) Reconceptualizing online discussion forums as a fabricated focus group: Illuminating educators’ language ideologies through asynchronous discussion posts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1991031
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Deroo, M., & Ponzio, C. (2019) Confronting ideologies: A discourse analysis of in-service teachers’ translanguaging stance through an ecological lens. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2019.1589604
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, J. (2013) Sociolinguistics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S., Palmer, D. K., & Henderson, K. (2017) Educator language ideologies and a top-down dual language program. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1071776
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015) Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
     [Google Scholar]
  17. García, O., Flores, N., Seltzer, K., Wei, L., Otheguy, R., & Rosa, J. (2021) Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Godley, A., & Reaser, J. (2018) Critical language pedagogy. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Henderson, K. (2017) Teacher language ideologies mediating classroom-level language policy in the implementation of dual language bilingual education. Linguistics and Education, 42, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.08.003
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Henderson, K. (2022) Language ideological multiplicity and tension within dual language bilingual education teachers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(2), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1791708
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hudley, A. C., & Mallinson, C. (2011) Understanding English language variation in U.S. schools. Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kroskrity, P. (2004) Language ideologies. In Duranti A. (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lew, S., & Siffrinn, N. (2019) Exploring language ideologies and preparing preservice teachers for multilingual and multicultural classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336919870281
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lippi-Green, R. (2012) English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mason, J. (2018) Qualitative researching (3rd ed.). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Metz, M. (2018) Challenges of confronting dominant language ideologies in the high school English classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(4), 455–477.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Metz, M. (2019) Accommodating linguistic prejudice? Examining English teachers’ language ideologies. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-09-2018-0081
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Metz, M., & Knight, H. (2021) The dominant school language narrative: Unpacking English teachers’ language ideologies. Language, 97(3), e238–e256. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0041
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ravitch, S., & Carl, N. (2021) Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (2nd ed.). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Roulston, K. (2014) Analysing interviews. In Flick U. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 297–312). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Saldaña, J. (2021) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Souto-Manning, M., Martinez, D. C., & Musser, A. D. (2022) ELA as English language abolition: Toward a pedagogy of communicative belonging. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.464
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Valdés, G., Poza, L., & Brooks, M. (2014) Educating students who do not speak the societal language: The social construction of language-learner categories. MLA Profession. https://profession.mla.org/educating-students-who-do-not-speak-the-societal-language-the-social-construction-of-language-learner-categories/
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Weaver, M., & Fowler-Amato, M. (2022) Understanding English teachers’ ideological becoming in the work toward linguistic justice. English Education, 55(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee202232131
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Wheeler, R. (2019) Attitude change is not enough: Changing teacher practice to disrupt dialect prejudice in the classroom. In Devereaux M. & Palmer C. (Eds.), Teaching language variation in the classroom: Strategies and models from teachers and linguists (pp. 109–119). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson, M., & Fairchild, C. (2011) Collaborative learning and the importance of the discussion board. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 27(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479310389609
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Woodard, R., & Rao, A. (2020) Tensions and possibilities in fostering critical language ideologies in elementary teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1742106
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Young, V. A. (2013) Keep code-meshing. In Canagarajah S. (Ed.), Literacy as translingual practice: Between communities and classrooms (pp. 139–145). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Young, V. A. (2020) Call for a radical liberatory antiracist literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(1), 88–94.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025594413
Loading
Framing Educators’ Orientations to Standardized English via Language Ideological Justifications
Research in the Teaching of English 59, 413 (2025); https://doi.org/10.58680/rte2025594413
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025594413
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025594413
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test