Skip to content
2018
Volume 59, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

Please note that some discussions of domestic, sexual, and racial violence are included in this article. This article explores how teachers and students in a teacher training program constructed precarious moments by engaging with sexual assault literature and pedagogy that centers rape culture and sexual trauma. In this qualitative feminist study, 23 participants took up readings of a sexual trauma text set and responded to pedagogy for teaching such texts with adolescent students in the Canadian K-12 public school system. A focal aim of this project is to think ahead to how teachers in training might cultivate radical communities prepared to address the pervasiveness of sexual assault and the insidiousness of rape culture in the secondary English classroom. As such, the ways in which teacher candidates’ experiences of and witnessing precarious personal safety, as well as how precarious moments impacted their attitudes toward considering this pedagogy in particular, are analyzed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025593311
2025-02-01
2026-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdulali S. (2018) What we talk about when we talk about rape. The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams B. (2020) “I didn’t feel confident talking about this issue . . . but I knew I could talk about a book”: Using young adult literature to make sense of #MeToo. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(2), 209–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams B. (2021) Consent is not as simple as tea: Student activism against rape culture. Girlhood Studies, 14(1), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams B. (2024) “How am I as an individual personally processing this?”: Reflective journaling for critical literacy development. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 54(2), 66–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ahmed, S. (2015, June29). Against students. The New Inquiry. https://thenewinquiry.com/against-students/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmed S. (2017) Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed, S. [@SaraN Ahmed] (2018, September4). It’s important to give time: To listen carefully to those who’ve been through the difficult, messy, painful process of making [Post]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/SaraNAhmed/status/1036521027902337024
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ahmed S. (2021) Complaint!Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Allen, K. R., Letiecq B. L., Roberto K. A., Rosenblatt P. C., & Wieling E. (2019) Dialogue about reflexivity. In Humble A. M. & Radina M. E. (Eds.), How qualitative data analysis happens: Moving beyond “themes emerged” (pp. 213–220). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Almanssori, S. (2022a) A feminist inquiry into Canadian pre-service teacher narratives on sex education and sexual violence prevention. Gender and Education, 34(8), 1009–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Almanssori, S. (2022b) Sexual violence prevention is missing in teacher education: Perspectives of teacher candidates on prevention education. Sex Education, 23(6), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2108391
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Anderson L. H. (2018) Speak: The graphic novel (Carroll, E. Illus.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Anwer M., & Varner M. (2019) In defense of violent films: Incorporating cinematic violence and on-screen death in the undergraduate classroom. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 41(3), 139–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Badia J. (2021) “Dismissed, trivialized, misread”: Re-examining the reception of women’s literature through the #MeToo movement. In Holland M. K. & Hewett H. (Eds.), #MeToo and literary studies: Reading, writing, and teaching about sexual violence and rape culture (pp. 31–42). Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Barrett B. J. (2010) Is “safety” dangerous? A critical examination of the classroom as safe space. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), Article 9.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Block F. L. (2000) The rose and the beast: Fairy tales retold. HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Blumer, M. L. C., Greene M. S., Thomte N. L., & Green P. M. (2013) Are we queer yet? Addressing heterosexual and gender-conforming privilege. In Case K. (Ed.), Deconstructing privilege: Teaching and learning as allies in the classroom (pp. 151–168). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bonner L. (2016) What to do when you’re raped: An ABC handbook for Native girls. Native American Women’s Health Education Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brant-Birioukov K., Ng-A-Fook N., & Llewellyn K. R. (2020) Re-storying settler teacher education: Truth, reconciliation, and oral history. In Llewellyn K. R. & Ng-A-Fook N. (Eds.), Oral history, education, and justice: Possibilities and limitations for redress and reconciliation (pp. 107–131). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brigley Thompson Z. (2020) From safe spaces to precarious moments: Teaching sexuality and violence in the American higher education classroom. Gender and Education, 32(3), 395–411.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bruno L., & Joelsson T. (2023) Towards a transformative space for conversations about sexualised violence? Obstacles, strategies and precarious moments. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 31(1), 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bryson M. (2000) Guilt and education. Philosophy of Education, 56, 365–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Buchanan F., & Wendt S. (2018) Opening doors: Women’s participation in feminist studies about domestic violence. Qualitative Social Work, 17(6), 762–777.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Buchwald E., Fletcher P. R., & Roth, M. (Eds) (2005) Transforming a rape culture (Rev. ed.). Milkweed Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Burr W. R. (1990) Beyond I-statements in family communication. Family Relations, 39(3), 266–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Butler J. (2009) Performativity, precarity and sexual politics. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3), i–xiii.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Butler-Kisber L., & Stewart M. (2009) The use of poetry clusters in poetic inquiry. In Prendergast M., Leggo C. & Sameshima P. (Eds.), Poetic inquiry: Vibrant voices in the social sciences (pp. 1–12). Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Carbó, P. A., Andrea Vázquez Ahumada M., Caballero A. D., & Lezama Argüelles, G. A. (2016) “How do I do discourse analysis?” Teaching discourse analysis to novice researchers through a study of intimate partner gender violence among migrant women. Qualitative Social Work, 15(3), 363–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Casey, J. G. (Ed) (2015) Teaching tainted lit: Popular American fiction in today’s classroom. University of Iowa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Clarke N. (2016) Red intersectionality and violence-informed witnessing praxis with Indigenous girls. Girlhood Studies, 9(2), 46–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Colantonio-Yurko K. C., Miller H. C., Cheveallier J. (2018) “But she didn’t scream”: Teaching about sexual assault in young adult literature. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 14(1), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Crenshaw K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Deer S. (2015) The beginning and end of rape: Confronting sexual violence in Native America. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dowd-Arrow E. J., & Creel, S. R. (2016) “I know you want it”: Teaching the blurred lines of eighteenth-century rape culture. ABO: Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts, 1640-1830, 6(2), Article 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dutro E. (2011) Writing wounded: Trauma, testimony, and critical witness in literacy classrooms. English Education, 43(2), 193–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dutro E. (2019) The vulnerable heart of literacy: Centering trauma as powerful pedagogy. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Faulkner, S. (2018a) Crank up the feminism: Poetic inquiry as feminist methodology. Humanities, 7(3), 85.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Faulkner, S. (2018b) Real women run: Running as feminist embodiment. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Faulkner, S. (2020a) Poetic inquiry: Craft, method and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Faulkner, S. L. (2020b) Trigger warning: Poetry as feminist response to media headlines. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(3-4), 325–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fernando M. (2019) Critique as care. Critical Times, 2(1), 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ferreday D. (2015) Game of Thrones, rape culture and feminist fandom. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Fitzpatrick K. (2019) Generous thinking: A radical approach to saving the university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Flaumenhaft M. J. (2017) Romeo and Juliet for grownups. The Review of Politics, 79(4), 545–563.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Freeman E. (2019) Feminist theory and its use in qualitative research in education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gay R. (2014) Bad feminist. HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gilhooly G. (2018) I am nobody: Confronting the sexually abusive coach who stole my life. Greystone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gilmore L. (2017) Tainted witness: Why we doubt what women say about their lives. Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Harrington C. (2019) Neo-liberal subjectivity, self-branding and “my rape story” YouTube videos. Critical Sociology, 45(7-8), 1181–1194.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Harris K. L. (2013) Show them a good time: Organizing the intersections of sexual violence. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(4), 568–595.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Henry A. (1994) There are no safe places: Pedagogy as powerful and dangerous terrain. Action in Teacher Education, 15(4), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Henry, A. (2017, September6). Dear white people, wake up: Canada is racist. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/dear-white-people-wake-up-canada-is-racist-83124
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Ed) (2014) Feminist research practice. SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hill, C. & Malo-Juvera, V. (Eds) (2019) Critical approaches to teaching the high school novel: Reinterpreting canonical literature. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hill Collins P., & Bilge S. (2016) Inter-sectionality. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hirsch A. (2018) Fragments. In Gay R. (Ed.), Not that bad: Dispatches from rape culture (pp. 1–14). Harper Perennial.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hoodfar H. (1997) Feminist anthropology and critical pedagogy: The anthropology of classrooms’ excluded voices. In de Castell S. & Bryson M. (Eds.), Radical in<ter>ventions: Identity, politics, and difference/s in educational praxis (pp. 211–232). State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. hooks, b. (2009) Belonging: A culture of place. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. hooks, b. (2010) Teaching critical thinking: Practical wisdom. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. hooks, b., & Hall S. (2018) Uncut funk: A contemplative dialogue. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Iyer P. (2019) “Due to all this fear, we’re getting less freedom”: Young people’s understandings of gender and sexual violence in New Delhi, India. Gender and Education, 31(2), 222–239.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. James K. (2009) Cut-up consciousness and talking trash: Poetic inquiry and the spam-bot’s text. In Prendergast M., Leggo C., & Sameshima P. (Eds.), Poetic inquiry: Vibrant voices in the social sciences (pp. 59–74). Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. James K. (2013) Introduction. In James K., Dobson T., & Leggo C. (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms: Creative and critical advice from Canada’s teacher educators (pp. 4–14). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Jayaratne T. E., & Stewart A. J. (2008) Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Current feminist issues and practical strategies. In Jaggar A. M. (Ed.), Just methods: An interdisciplinary feminist reader (pp. 44–57). Paradigm Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Johnson T. S., & Kerkoff S. (2018) #MeToo in English education. English Education, 51(1), 4–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26797017
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Jones C., Chappell A., & Alld red P. (2021) Feminist education for university staff responding to disclosures of sexual violence: A critique of the dominant model of staff development. Gender and Education, 33(2), 121–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kaur R. (2015) Milk and honey. Andrews McMeel.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Keiper, L. (n.d.). Toxic masculinity in Romeo and Juliet. West Virginia Council of Teachers of English. https://wvcte.com/2019/05/07/toxic-masculinity-in-romeo-and-juliet/
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ladson-Billings, G. (2003) Foreword. In Greene S. & Abt-Perkins D. (Eds.), Making race visible: Literacy research for cultural understanding (pp. vii–xi). Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lazar M. M. (2007) Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Lazar M. M. (2014) Feminist critical discourse analysis. In Ehrlich S., Meyerhoff M., & Holmes J. (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 180–199). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Lazar M. M. (2017) Feminist critical discourse analysis. In Flowerdew J. & Richardson J. E. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 372–387). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Leggo C. (2005) The heart of pedagogy: On poetic knowing and living. Teachers and Teaching, 11(5), 439–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Leggo C. (2013) Inspiring imagination and creativity. In James K., Dobson T., & Leggo C. (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms: Creative and critical advice from Canada’s teacher educators (pp. 126–133). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Leipciger N. (2017) The weight of freedom. The Azrieli Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Littlechild B., Mills K., & Parkes R. (2020) Working with conflict in social work practice. Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lykke N. (2010) Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Malo-Juvera, V. (2014) Speak: The effect of literacy instruction on adolescents’ rape myth acceptance. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 407–427.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Manne K. (2017) Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Marshall E. (2009) Girlhood, sexual violence, and agency in Francesca Lia Block’s “Wolf.”Children’s Literature in Education, 40, 217–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Martin, J. L., Nickels A. E., Sharp-Grier, M. (Eds) (2017) Feminist pedagogy, practice, and activism: Improving lives for girls and women. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. McMillan C., & Jenkins A. (2016) “A magical little pill that will relieve you of your womanly issues”: What young women say about menstrual suppression. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 11(1), Article 32932.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Millar K. A. (2017) Toward a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass, 11(6), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Miller H. C., Boehm S., Colantonio-Yurko K., Adams B., & Mertens G. (2023) Naming and challenging rape culture in English curriculum: A framework for teaching canonical texts with contemporary adaptations. Changing English, 30(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/135868 4X.2023.2196611
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Moore, A. (2020a) On resisting rape culture with teachers-to-be: A research poem. Intersections: Critical Issues in Education, 4(1), 50–51. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/intersections/vol4/iss1/7/
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Moore, A. (2020b) Pulping as poetic inquiry: On upcycling “upset” to reckon anew with rape culture, rejection, and (re)turning to trauma texts. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(6), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708620912802
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Moore, A. (2020c) “Why don’t we always see her face?”: The significance of the gallery walk in teaching trauma literature. English Practice, 61(1), 43–47. https://bctela.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-BCTELA-English-Practice.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Moore, A. (2022a) Creating a canon for change: How teacher candidates demonstrate readiness to reckon with rape culture through reading trauma literature. Teaching Education, 34(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2044770
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Moore, A. (2022b) Dot-dot-dot: A feminist critical poetic inquiry of silence in teacher candidates’ responses to teaching sexual assault narratives. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 19(2), 64–83. https://jcacs.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jcacs/article/view/40712/36704
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Moore, A. (2022c) “I feel like I’m more likely to get triggered, I guess?”: A poetry cluster about safety in rape culture research. Artizein: Arts and Teaching Journal, 7(1), 74–85. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1157&context=atj
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Moore, A. (2022d) “I felt scared the whole time”: On emotional responses to sexual assault narratives. Feminist Pedagogy, 2(2), Article 4. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/feministpedagogy/vol2/iss2/4
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Moore, A. (2022e) Safe space(s), content (trigger) warnings, and being “care-ful” with trauma literature pedagogy and rape culture in secondary English teacher education. Changing English, 29(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2021.2006053
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Moore A. (2023) MeToo moments: Teacher candidates’ disclosures of sexual violence. Action in Teacher Education, 45(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2023.2242324
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Ohito E. O., & Nyach ae T. M. (2019) Poetically poking at language and power: Using Black feminist poetry to conduct rigorous feminist critical discourse analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9-10), 839–850.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Parsons L. T., & Pinkerton L. (2022) Poetry and prose as methodology: A synergy of knowing. Methodological Innovations, 15(2), 118–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Patton S. (2017) Spare the kids: Why whupping children won’t save Black America. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Paur J. (2012) Precarity talk: A virtual roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Paur, and Ana Vujanovic. TDR: The Drama Review, 56(4), 163–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Phelan A. (2011) Towards a complicated conversation: Teacher education and the curriculum turn. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 207–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Phelan S. (2019) Neoliberalism, the far right, and the disparaging of “social justice warriors.”Communication, Culture and Critique, 12(4), 455–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Phipps A., Ringrose J., Renold E., & Jackson C. (2018) Rape culture, lad culture and everyday sexism: Researching, conceptualizing and politicizing new mediations of gender and sexual violence. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Pitt A., & Britzman, D. (2003) Speculations on qualities of difficult knowledge in teaching and learning: An experiment in psychoanalytical research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6), 755–776.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Pollino M. A. (2020) (Mis)Representations of sexual violence: The Brett Kavana-ugh and Christine Blasey Ford testimonies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 37(1), 71–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Prendergast M. (2015) Poetic inquiry, 2007-2012: A surrender and catch found poem. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 678–685.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Purifoye G. Y. (2015) Nice-nastiness and other raced social interactions on public transport systems. City & Community, 14(3), 286–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Rak J. (2003) Do witness: Don’t: A woman’s word and trauma as pedagogy. TOPIA, 10, 53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Reynolds P. (2019) Performing Shakespeare’s women: Playing dead. The Arden Shakespeare.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Ringrose J. (2018) Digital feminist pedagogy and post-truth misogyny. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 647–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Ringrose J., & Showunmi V. (2016) Tackling teaching about Trump: Lessons from Black feminism. IOE London Blog. https://ioelondonblog.wordpress.com/2016/11/11/tackling-teaching-about-trump-lessons-from-black-feminism/
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Rogers S. L., Howieson J., & Neame C. (2018) I understand you feel that way, but I feel this way: The benefits of I-language and communicating perspective during conflict. PeerJ, 6, Article e4831.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Rosema L. (2018) What we didn’t say. In Gay R. (Ed.), Not that bad: Dispatches from rape culture (pp. 208–211). Harper Perennial.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Rybakova K., & Roccanti, R. (2016) Connecting the canon to current YA literature. American Secondary Education, 44(2), 31–45
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Simmons R. (2013) Foreword. In O’Quinn E. J. (Ed.), Girls’ literacy experiences in and out of school: Learning and composing gendered identities (pp. ix–x). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Simon R. I., & Eppert C. (1997) Remembering obligation: Pedagogy and the witness ing of testimony of historical trauma. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(2), 175–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Sumera D. (2013) What is “participatory consciousness” and why should it matter to English teachers? In James K., Dobson T., & Leggo C. (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms: Creative and critical advice from Canada’s teacher educators (pp. 139–141). Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Vowell C. (2011) Cree kinship terms. âpihtawikosisân. https://apihtawikosisan.com/2011/10/cree-kinship-terms/
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Watson R. N., & Dickey S. (2005) Wherefore art thou Tereu? Juliet and the legacy of rape. Renaissance Quarterly, 58(1), 127–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Whitaker T. R., & Snell C. L. (2016) Parenting while powerless: Consequences of “the talk.”Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26(3-4), 303–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Whitehead, J. (2017, July20). mihkokwaniy. CBC Radio. http://www.cbc.ca/radio/newfie/opening-up-about-indigenous-intimacy-1.4181758/read-mihkokwaniy-by-poet-joshua-whitehead-1.4201873
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Wiebe S., Guiney Yallop J. J., Fels L., Snowber C., Richardson P., Honein N., Faulkner S. L., Dar k K., & Leggo C. (2016) Poetic inquiry of and on play. Canadian Journal of Education, 39(3), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Willis P. (2002) Don’t call it poetry. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 2(1), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Wise T., & Case K. (2013) Pedagogy for the privileged: Addressing inequality and injustice without shame or blame. In Case K. (Ed.), Deconstructing privilege: Teaching and learning as allies in the classroom (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Wunker E. (2016) Notes from a feminist killjoy: Essays on everyday life. BookThug.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025593311
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2025593311
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test