Skip to content
2018
Volume 59, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte20245911
2024-08-01
2025-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alcoff L. M (2010) Epistemic identities. Episteme, 7(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2010.0003
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alim H. S (2017) What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter. InParis D. & Alim S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 85–101). Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Almassi B (2009) Conflicting expert testimony and the search for gravitational waves. Philosophy of Science, 76(5), 570–584. https://doi.org/10.1086/605789
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson K. T., & Holloway J (2020, March3). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Asfaha Y. M (2024) On epistemology in researching the teaching and learning of literacy, literature, and the language arts. Research in the Teaching of English, 58(3), 330–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Astro A (2014) Revisiting Wiesel’s night in Yiddish, French, and English. Partial Answers, 12(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2014.0012
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakhtin M. M (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ball S. J (2013) Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartky S. L (1990) On psychological oppression. InBartky S. L. (Ed.), Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beach R., & Bloome D. (Eds) (2019) Languaging relations for transforming the literacy and language arts classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351036580
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Beauchemin F (2021) Literacy practices as social: Relational-keys in literacy events. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 20(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-01-2020-0001
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Becker A. L (1991) Language and languaging. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(91)90013-L
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Campano G., Ghiso M. P., LeBlanc R., & Sánchez L (2016) “American hunger”: Challenging epistemic injustice through collaborative teacher inquir. InLampert J. & Burnett B. (Eds.), Teacher education for high poverty schools (pp. 33–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22059-8
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Caraballo L., Lozenski B. D., Lyiscott J. J., & Morrell E (2017) YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686948
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chinn C. A., Barzilai S., & Duncan R. G (2020) Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins P. H (1990) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins P. H (2003) Feminist epistemology. InTurning points in qualitative research: tying knots in a handkerchief (Vol. 2, p. 47).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Compton‐Lilly C., Rogers R., & Lewis T. Y (2012) Analyzing epistemological considerations related to diversity: An integrative critical literature review of family literacy scholarship. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.009
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Darling-Hammond L (2016) Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Daukas N (2006) Epistemic trust and social location. Episteme, 3(1–2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.109
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Davies B (2014) Feminism for the early years: A diffractive analysis. Redress, 23(3), 12–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dillard C. B (2000) The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390050211565
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dinsmore D. L (2017) Examining the ontological and epistemic assumptions of research on metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1125–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1333575
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Du Bois W. E. B (1903) Souls of Black folks: Essays and sketches. A.C. McClurg and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Elaine M (2024) On epistemology in researching the teaching and learning of literacy, literature, and the language arts. Research in the Teaching of English, 58(4), 429–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellis G. W (1917) The leopard's claw: a thrilling story of love and adventure from a European castle through the West African jungle, disclosing a deep insight into the quality and spiritual influence of African social institutions and conditions, and revealing a profound psyschic [sic] interpretation of African inner life, all clustered about the mysterious function and significance of the leopard's claw. International Authors’ Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fanon F (1952) Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fanon F (1963) The wretched of the earth. Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fricker M (2006) Powerlessness and social interpretation. Episteme, 3(1–2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.96
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fricker M (2015) Epistemic contribution as a central human capability. InHull G. (Ed.), The equal society: Essays on equality in theory and practice (pp. 73–90). Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fricker M (2017) Evolving concepts of epistemic injustice. InKidd I. J., Medina J., & Pohlhaus G. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 53–60). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gay G (1994) At the essence of learning: Multicultural education. Kappa Delta Pi.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldberg S (2010) Comments on Miranda Fricker’s epistemic injustice. Episteme, 7(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2010.0004
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Habermas J (1985) The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. (Vol. 1). Beacon press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall S (2016) Cultural studies 1983: A theoretical history. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw8wg
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hall S (2021) Selected writings on race and difference. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478021223
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hargreaves D. H (1997) In defence of research for evidence‐based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230402
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hendrix K. G (2002) “Did being black introduce bias into your study?”: Attempting to mute the race-related research of black scholar. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170290089935
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hilliard A. G III (1976) A review of Leon Kamin’s the science and politics of IQ. Journal of Black Psychology, 2(2), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/009579847600200210
    [Google Scholar]
  41. hooks b (1986) Talking back. Discourse, 8(3), 123–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. hooks b (1994) Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Irzik G., & Kurtulmus F (2019) What is epistemic public trust in science?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(4), 1145–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy007
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Joseph N. M., Haynes C., & Patton L. D (2021) The politics of publishing: A national conversation with scholars who use their research about black women to address Intersectionality. Educational Researcher, 50(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20985460
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Juzwik M. M., Deroo M. R., Ponzio C., & Wheatley L (2023) Transnational youth expressing religious being and belonging through writing: Youth writers’ purposes, audiences, and formal choices across public US secondary classrooms, 2015-2020. Research in the Teaching of English, 58(2), 156–192. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202332790
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kamin L (1974) The science and politics of I.Q. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kidd I. J., Medina J., & Pohlhaus G.Jr (Eds) (2017) Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 53–60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043
    [Google Scholar]
  48. King J. E (2015) Dysconscious racism, Afrocentric praxis, and education or human freedom: Through the years I keep on toiling. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717357
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kubota R (2020) Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kugelmas J., & Boyardin J. (Eds) (1998) From a ruined garden: The memorial books of Polish Jewry. Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Labov W (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ladson-Billings G (1995) Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lather P (1992) Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post‐structural perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543529
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lillis T., & Scott M (2007) Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lytle S., & Cochran-Smith M (1992) Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.4.4lm3811r1033431n
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Madsen L. M., Karrebæk M. S., & Møller J. S (2016) Everyday languaging. De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Medina J (2013a) The epistemology of ignorance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Medina J (2013b) The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Medina J (2020) Trust and epistemic injustice. InSimon J. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of trust and philosophy (pp. 52–63). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542294
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Mignolo W (2011) The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mignolo W. D., & Escobar A. (Eds) (2013) Globalization and the decolonial option. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mohebali M., & Jangjou E (2023) Silence as an educational tool to deconstruct normative societal structures and create epistemic trust. Feminist Pedagogy, 4(1), Article 14. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/feministpedagogy/vol4/iss1/14
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Morrison T (1992) Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Morrison T (1993) Nobel Prize lecture. [Online]. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1993/morrison/lecture/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development (US) (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Nuthall G (2004) Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Origgi G (2012) Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652213
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Outlaw L (1996) On race and philosophy. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Outlaw L (1997) Africana philosophy. The Journal of Ethics, 1(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009724406404
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Outlaw L. T (2007) Social ordering and the systematic production of ignorance. InSullivan S. & Tuanna N. (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 197–211). State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791480038
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Paris D. (2012) Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Paris D., & Alim H. S. (Eds) (2017) Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Penuel W. R., & Watkins D. A (2019) Assessment to promote equity and epistemic justice: A use-case of a research-practice partnership in science education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843249
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Popkewitz T. S (2001) The production of reason and power: Curriculum history and intellectual traditions. InPopkewitz T. S., Franklin B. M., & Pereyra M. A. (Eds.), Cultural history and education: Critical essays on knowledge and schooling (pp. 151–183). Routledge/Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Poveda D (2023) On epistemology in researching the teaching and learning of literacy, literature, and the language arts. Research in the Teaching of English, 58(2), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Schey R (2022) Queer and trans youth (not) knowing: Experiences of epistemic (In) justice in the context of an LGBTQ+-Inclusive secondary curriculum. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 21(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-04-2022-0054
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Schwab A. P (2008) Epistemic trust, epistemic responsibility, and medical practice. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33(4), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn013
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Settles I. H., Jones M. K., Buchanan N. T., & Dotson K (2021) Epistemic exclusion: Scholar(Ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000174
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sherman B. R (2016) There’s no (testimonial) justice: Why pursuit of a virtue is not the solution to epistemic injustice. Social Epistemology, 30(3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2015.1031852
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Shuman A (2006) Storytelling rights: The uses of oral and written texts by urban adolescents. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Spivak G. C (1988) Can the subaltern speak?InNelson C. & Grossberg L. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–316). University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Stanley C. A (2007) When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X06298008
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Stockman I. J., & Vaughn-Cooke F. B (1982) A re-examination of research on the language of Black children: The need for a new framework. Journal of Education, 164(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748216400205
    [Google Scholar]
  84. UPI (2006, January19). New “Night” translation fixes errors. Retrieved12 March 2024, fromhttps://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2006/01/19/New-Night-translation-fixes-errors/16271137716232/
    [Google Scholar]
  85. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Services (2003) Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/evidence_based/randomized.asp
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Walker M (2020) Failures and possibilities of epistemic justice, with some implications for higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 61(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1474774
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Wiesel E., & Wiesel M (2004) Night penguin classics. Walker and Willis.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Willis A. I (1995) Reading the world of school literacy: Contextualizing the experience of a young African American male. Harvard Educational Review, 65(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.1.22226055362w11p5
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Wittgenstein L., Anscombe G., Hacker P., & Schulte J (2009) Philosophical investigations (G. Anscombe, P. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.). (4th ed.). John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Woodson C (1933) The miseducation of the Negro. Associated Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte20245911
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error