Skip to content
2018
  1. NCTE Publications Home
  2. All Journals
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Volume 58, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 58, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Although a growing body of research recognizes the importance of viewing argumentation as a means of understanding rather than combating others, little is known about how teachers cultivate this practice in classroom conversations when teaching argumentation. This study examines how argument can be taught in classroom discourse with an empathizing stance and generates associated pedagogical constructs. Adopting a microethnographic approach to discourse analysis, this study examines the key instructional events in an argumentative writing unit in two high school English language arts classes. The analysis demonstrates that the empathizing stance is introduced in the relationship between arguers and their warrants and the differences existing between arguers. It also generates four pedagogical constructs related to the teaching of argument with the stance: (1) identifying the connection between arguers’ warrants and backgrounds; (2) transposing oneself into others’ backgrounds; (3) exploring interlocutors’ common and divergent grounds; and (4) situating argument in a broader context. It concludes with a discussion of the affordances of teaching argument with an empathizing stance.

© 2024 by the National Council of Teachers of English
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte2024584405
2024-05-01
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/rte/58/4/researchintheteachingofenglish584405.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/rte2024584405&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agar M. (1994) Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews R. (2010) Argument in higher education: Improving practice through theory and research. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Athanases S. Z., & Larrabee T. G. (2003) Toward a consistent stance in teaching for equity: Learning to advocate for lesbian-and gay-identified youth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00098-7
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloome D., Carter S. P., Christian B. M., Otto S., & Shuart-Faris N. (2005) Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. L. Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd M. P., & Markarian W. C. (2015) Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–296.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyd M. P., Vasquez C. R., & Monaco C. (2024) “When anybody speaks, we all need to be involved”: Classroom conditions that support dialogic space. Theory into Practice, 63(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307558
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen-Branum L., Strong A., & Jones C. D. (2019) Mitigating myside bias in argumentation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.915
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Council of Europe (2018) Reference framework of competences for democratic culture. https://www.coe.int/en/web/reference-framework-of-competences-for-democratic-culture
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Crocco M., Halvorsen A.-L., Jacobsen R., & Segall A. (2018) Less arguing, more listening: Improving civility in classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(5), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718754818\
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Endacott J., & Brooks S. (2013) An updated theoretical and practical model for promoting historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-01-2013-b0003
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Felton M., Crowell A., & Liu T. (2015) Arguing to agree: Mitigating my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue. Written Communication, 32(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gergen K. J. (2009) An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Green J. L., Baker W. D., Chian M. M., Vanderhoof C., Hooper L., Kelly G. J., Skukauskaite A., & Kalainoff M. Z. (2020) Studying the over-time construction of knowledge in educational settings: A microethnographic discourse analysis approach. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 161–194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903121
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Green J., Skukauskaite A., & Castanheira M. L. (2012) Studying the discursive construction of learning lives for individuals and the collective. In Erstad O. & Sefton-Green J. (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 126–145). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Green J. L., & Wallat C. (1981) Mapping instructional conversations—A sociolinguistic ethnography. In Green J. L. & Wallat C. (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 161–195). Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gumperz J. J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hillocks G. J. (2010) Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction. English Journal, 99(6), 24–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim M. Y., & Shanahan E. (2023) Teaching argumentation with a dialogic stance: A case of an 11th-grade English language arts classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 43, Article 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100770
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lind A. R., Andersson-Bakken E., & Sandvik M. (2023) Patterns of peer talk in consensus-oriented classrooms: Deliberative argumentation or rush toward consensus? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 40, Article 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100703
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Litman C., & Greenleaf C. (2018) Argumentation tasks in secondary English language arts, history, and science: Variations in instructional focus and inquiry space. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.187
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Macagno F., Rapanta C., & Mayweg-Paus E. (2022) Coding empathy in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics, 192, 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.011
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Malloy J. A., Tracy K. N., Scales R. Q., Menickelli K., & Scales W. D. (2020) t’s not about being right: Developing argument through debate. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086 296X19896495
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Martinez D. C., Monea B., Phuong J., Rogers C. R., Thomas E. E., Stornaiuolo A., & Campano G. (2021) Emerging solidarities in literacy research. Research in the Teaching of English, 55(4), 337–340.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mercer N., & Littleton K. (2007) Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mirra N. (2018) Educating for empathy. Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell C. J. (1984) Case studies. In Ellen R. F. (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/ social studies, science, and technical subjects. https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ADA-Compliant-ELA-Standards.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Newell G. E., Bloome D., & Hirvela A. (2015) Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780498
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Newell G., Bloome D., Hirvela A., Lin T., Kim M.-Y., Goff B., Ryu S., Weyand L., Buescher E., & Ha S. Y. (2017) Teaching and learning literary argumentation in high school English language arts classrooms. In Hinchman K. A. & Appleman D. A. (Eds.), Adolescent literacies: A handbook of practicebased research (pp. 379–397). Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Plato (1967) Plato in twelve volumes (Vol. 3; Lamb W. R. M., Trans.). Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Rapanta C. (2021) Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rex L. A., Thomas E. E., & Engel S. (2010) Applying Toulmin: Teaching logical reasoning and argumentative writing. English Journal, 99(6), 56–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ryu S. (2016) Teaching and learning of sophisticated argumentative writing based on dialogic views of rationality in high school language arts classrooms: A formative and design experiment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Shanahan E., & Kim M.-Y. (2021) Looking inward and outward: Fostering introspective argumentation. English Journal, 110(4), 100–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sherry M. B. (2014) Indirect challenges and provocative paraphrases: Using cultural conflict-talk practices to promote students’ dialogic participation in whole-class discussions. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(2), 141–167.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Stanovich K. E., West R. F., & Toplak M. E. (2013) Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tannen D. (1998) The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. Ballantine Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Toulmin S. (2003) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Turner K. H., & Hicks T. (2017) Argument in the real world: Teaching adolescents to read and write digital texts. Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Vanderheide J., Beaton E. L., & Wynhoff Olsen A. (2021) Making others’ perspectives present: Arguments that listen. English Journal, 110(5), 87–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Volosinov V. (1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language. Seminar Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Warren J. (2010) Taming the warrant in Toulmin’s model of argument. English Journal, 6(6), 41–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wells G. (1999) Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Weyand L., Goff B., & Newell G. (2018) The social construction of warranting evidence in two classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17751173
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2024584405
Loading
Adopting an Empathizing Stance in Classroom Argumentation: Pedagogical Constructs and Affordances
Research in the Teaching of English 58, 405 (2024); https://doi.org/10.58680/rte2024584405
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2024584405
/content/journals/10.58680/rte2024584405
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test