Skip to content
2018
Volume 58, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

This article posits the need for literacy research on teachers’ and students’ use of systems thinking for studying climate change. Drawing on sociocultural activity theory of learning, it perceives the need for engaging in systems thinking given the negative impacts of energy, transportation and community design, agriculture and food production, and economics and politics systems themselves on ecosystems—for example, the negative effects of fossil fuel energy systems on emissions production. Researchers could analyze teachers’ and/or students’ use of the following components derived from activity theory for analyzing these systems: objects and outcomes, roles, tools, rules and norms, and beliefs and discourses. For example, teachers and students may employ language for naming phenomena about climate change, responding to literature, engaging in media production, or using emissions mapping tools to critique status-quo systems and use those tools to portray ways of transforming those systems. They may also engage in critical inquiry of rules and norms or beliefs and discourses derived from capitalist economic systems that promote excessive consumption with detrimental environmental impacts and attempts in the political system to resist instruction on climate change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte202332613
2023-08-01
2025-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamimore S. (2022) Reimagining systems for a sustainable future. New Degree Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barad K. (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnett J. T. (2022) Mourning in the Anthropocene: Ecological grief and earthly coexistence. Michigan State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beach R. (2022) Drawing on students’ worlds in the ELA classroom: Toward critical engagement and deep learning. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beach R. (2023a) Addressing the challenges of preparing teachers to teach about the climate crisis. The Teacher Educator. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2023.2175401
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beach R. (2023b) Teachers and students use of systems thinking about their participation in school environmental clubs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1299
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beach R., & Bloome D. Eds. (2019) Languaging relations for transforming the literacy and language arts classroom. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Beach R., Share J., & Webb A. (2017) Teaching climate change to adolescents: Reading, writing, and making a difference. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Beach R., & Smith B. (2021) Using digital tools for studying about and addressing climate change. In Khosrow-Pour M. (Ed.), Research anthology on environmental and societal impacts of climate change (pp. 724–747). IGI Global.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beach R., & Smith B. Eds. (2023) Youth created media on the climate crisis: Hear our voices. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloome D., Brown A. F., Kim M-Y., & Tang R. J. (2019) Languaging personhood in classroom conversation. In Beach R. & Bloome D. (Eds.), Languaging relations for transformation of the literacy and language arts classroom (pp. 235–254). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloome D., & Clark C. (2006) Discoursein-use. In Green J., Camilli G., & Elmore P. (Eds.), Complementary methods in research in education (pp. 227–242). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Breslyn W., & McGinnis J. R. (2019) Investigating preservice elementary science teachers’ understanding of climate change from a computational thinking systems perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), Article em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Busch K. C., & Chávez R. A. (2022) Adolescent framings of climate change, psychological distancing, and implications for climate change concern and behavior. Climatic Change, 171, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584‑022‑03349‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Busch K. C., & Román D. (2017) Fundamental climate literacy and the promise of the next generation science standards. In Shepardson D. P., Roychoudhury A., & Hirsch A. S. (Eds.), Teaching and learning about climate change: A framework for educators (pp. 120–134). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Capra F., & Luisi P. L. (2016) The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chancel L., & Piketty T. (2015) Carbon and inequality: From Kyoto to Paris trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998-2013) and prospects for an equitable adaptation fund World Inequality Lab. HALSHS. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02655266/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cradock-Henry N. A., Connolly J., Blackett P., & Lawrence J. (2020) Elaborating a systems methodology for cascading climate change impacts and implications. MethodsX, 7, Article 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100893
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Damico J. S., & Baildon M. C. (2022) How to confront climate denial: Literacy, social studies, and climate change. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Damico J., Baildon M., & Panos A. (2023) How can we confront climate denial? Critical literacy+, eco-civic practices, and inquiry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(4), 257–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Edge D., McMullen J., Mohammad G., & Barnwell R. Producers (2020) The power of big oil [Video]. Frontline. http://t.ly/4gvB
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eide E., & Kunelius R. (2021) Voices of a generation the communicative power of youth activism. Climatic Change, 169, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584‑021‑03211‑z
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Engeström Y., & Sannino A. (2010) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Eppley K., Peterson S. S., & Wood J. (2022) Representations of Indigenous and non-Indigenous rural ways of being in picture books for children. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 18(1), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fanta D., Braeutigam J., & Riess W. (2020) Fostering systems thinking in student teachers of biology and geography—An intervention study. Journal of Biological Education, 54(3), 226–244. http://t.ly/zT9kw
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fesmire S. (2010) Ecological imagination. Environmental Ethics, 32(2), 183–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fretz E. J. Ed. (2015) Climate change across the curriculum. Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fritsche I., & Masson T. (2021) Collective climate action: When do people turn into collective environmental agents? Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 114–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaffron P., & Niemeier D. (2015) School locations and traffic emissions: Environmental (in) justice findings using a new screening method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(2), 2009–2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gallagher M. F., & Cattelino J. (2020) Youth, climate change and visions of the future in Miami. Local Environment, 25(4), 290–304. https://t.ly/vituN
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Garavito-Bermúdez D., Lundholm C., & Crona B. (2016) Linking a conceptual framework on systems thinking with experiential knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 22(1), 89–110. http://t.ly/VOnJz
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gillard R., Gouldson A., Paavola J., & Van Alstine J. (2016) Transformational responses to climate change: Beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. WIREs Climate Change, 7(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.384
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gore T. (2020, September 21). Confronting carbon inequality [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://t.ly/uI6ud
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gosh A. (2016) The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gutiérrez K. D., Becker B. L. C., Espinoza M. L., Cortes K. L., Cortez A., Lizárraga J. R., Rivero E., Villegas K., & Yin P. (2019) Youth as historical actors in the production of possible futures. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 291–308. http://t.ly/L149q
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hasan H., Smith S., & Finnegan P. (2017) An activity theoretic analysis of the mediating role of information systems in tackling climate change adaptation. Information Systems Journal, 27(3), 271–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12104
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hautea S., Parks P., Takahashi B., & Zeng J. (2021) Showing they care (or don’t): Affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hinrichs C.C. (2014) Transitions to sustainability: A change in thinking about food systems change?. Agriculture and Human Values, 31, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460‑014‑9479‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ivanovich C. C., Sun T., Gordon D. R., & Ocko I. B. (2023) Future warming from global food consumption. Nature Climate Change, 13, 297–302. https://t.ly/jWOic
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kamenetz A. (2019, April 22). Most teachers don’t teach climate change; 4 in 5 parents wish they did. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/22/714262267/most-teachers-dont-teach-climate-change-4-in-5-parents-wish-they-did
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Karaarslan-Semiz G. (2022) Outdoor education for sustainability with systems thinking perspective. In Karaarslan-Semiz G. (Ed.), Education for sustainable development in primary and secondary schools (pp. 39–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑09112‑4_4
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Karahan E., & Roehrig G. (2014) Constructing media artifacts in a social constructivist environment to enhance students’ environmental awareness and activism. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 103–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kianni S. (2023) Language shouldn’t be a barrier to climate action [Video]. TED Conferences. https://t.ly/A_TXA
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Klein N. (2015) This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Krasny M. E., & Roth W.-M. (2010) Environmental education for social-ecological system resilience: A perspective from activity theory. Environmental Education Research, 16(5-6), 545–558. https://t.ly/SQLPG
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lacy P., Long J., & Spindler W. (2020) The circular economy handbook: Realizing the circular advantage. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lease J. R. Ed. (2020) Climate consciousness and environmental activism in composition: Writing to save the world. Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. León B., Boykoff M., Huda J., & Rodrigo C. (2018) Framing in climate change videos. In León B. & Bourk M. (Eds.), Communicating science and technology through online video: Researching a new media phenomenon (pp. 107–119). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lezak S. B., & Thibodeau P. H. (2016) Systems thinking and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 143–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Linell P. (2016) On agency in situated languaging: Participatory agency and competing approaches. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 39–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Littrell M. K., Tayne K., Okochi C., Leckey E., Gold A. U., & Lynds S. (2020) Student perspectives on climate change through place-based filmmaking. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 594–610. http://t.ly/GojmI
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lynas M. (2020) Our final warning: Six degrees of climate emergency. 4th Estate.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Marshall R. F. (2020, April). Deconstructing free enterprise and reconstructing for sustainability: Cultural-ecological propaganda analysis for educators. Journal of Sustainability Education. http://t.ly/l0cC8
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Martinez N. (2023) Indigenous literacies: A look at pedagogies and policy in the Southwest United States. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(5), 282–289. http://t.ly/C91oj
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Mensah P., Katerere D., Hachigonta S., & Roodt A. Eds. (2018) Systems analysis approach for complex global challenges. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Negin E. (2022, March 31). It’s time for Charles Koch to testify about his climate change disinformation campaign. The Equation. https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/its-time-for-charles-koch-to-testify-about-his-climate-change-disinformation-campaign/
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Neubauer L. (2023, January). The fairy tales of the fossil fuel industry and a better climate story [Video]. TED Conferences. http://t.ly/0WkSL
    [Google Scholar]
  58. NGSS Lead States (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nolan J. E. S., Coker E. S., Ward B. R., Williamson Y. A., & Harley K. G. (2021) “Freedom to breathe”: Youth participatory action research (YPAR) to investigate air pollution inequities in Richmond, CA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), Article 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020554
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Oreskes N., & Conway E. M. (2023) The big myth: How American business taught us to loathe government and love the free market. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Osaka S. (2023, February 9). Can individuals solve climate change? New federal cash makes it more possible than ever. The Washington Post. http://t.ly/yiHOT
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Oxfam (2014, January 20). Rigged rules mean economic growth increasingly “winner takes all” for rich elites all over the world. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/rigged-rules-mean-economic-growth-increasingly-winner-takes-all-rich-elites-all-over
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Panos A., & Damico J. (2021) Less than one percent is not enough: How leading literacy organizations engaged with climate change from 2008 to 2019. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 17(1). http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/volume-171/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Pelling M., O’Brien K., & Matyas D. (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133, 113–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Perry M. (2020) Pluriversal literacies: Affect and relationality in vulnerable times. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.312
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Polk E., Beach R., & Webb A. (2023) Fostering climate crisis global literacies in the classroom. In Kerkhoff S. N. & Spires H. A. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on global literacies: Bridging research and practice (pp. 230–246). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Popovich N., Rojanasakul M., & Plumer B. (2022, December 13). The climate impact of your neighborhood, mapped. The New York Times. http://t.ly/QGdd
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Power-Carter S., & Zakeri B. (2019) Examining our blind spots: Personhood, literacy, and power. In Bloome D., Castanheira M. L., Leung C., & Rowsell J. (Eds.), Re-theorizing literacy practices: Complex social and cultural contexts (pp. 221–233). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club, & Urgewald (2022) Banking on climate chaos: Fossil fuel finance report 2022. https://www.ran.org/publications/banking-on-climate-chaos-2022/
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ray R., & Mahmoudi H. Eds. (2022) Systemic racism in America: Sociological theory, education inequality, and social change. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Reich R. B. (2020) The system: Who rigged it, how we fix it. Knopf Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Reilly J., McGivney E., Dede C., & Grotzer T. (2021) Assessing science identity exploration in immersive virtual environments: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Experimental Education, 89(3), 468–489.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Roychoudhury A., Shepardson D. P., & Hirsch A. S. (2017) System thinking and teaching in the context of climate system and climate change. In Shepard-son D. P., Roychoudhury A., & Hirsch A. S. (Eds.), Teaching and learning about climate change: A framework for educators (pp. 29–42). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Säfström C. A., & Östman L. (2020) Transactive teaching in a time of climate crisis. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(4), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‑9752.12477
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sanneh E. S. (2018) Systems thinking for sustainable development: Climate change and the environment. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Schein S. (2015) A new psychology for sustainability leadership: The hidden power of ecological worldviews. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Share J. Ed. (in press). For the love of nature: Ecowriting the world. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Share J., & Beach R. (2022, December 1). Critical media literacy analysis and production for systems thinking about climate change. Journal of Media Literacy. https://ic4ml.org/journal-article/critical-media-literacy-analysis-and-production-for-systems-thinking-about-climate-change/
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Singh P., Ao B., & Yadav A. Eds. (2023) Global climate change and environmental refugees: Nature, framework and legality. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Smil V. (2022) How the world really works. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Southwick S. (2019, May 15). The grand challenge of fast fashion [Video]. YouTube. https://gcc.umn.edu/stories/fast-fashion
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Stibbe A. (2021) Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Stoll M. (2023) Profit: An environmental history. Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Sussman A. (2022, January 10). Systems: The super CCC (for science and environmental educators). https://www.drartscience.com/post/systems-the-super-ccc
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Thunberg G. (2023) The climate book: The facts and the solutions. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. United Nations Environment Programme (2022, October 27). Emissions gap report 2022. https://t.ly/ZBxGo
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Varela-Losada M., Vega-Marcote P., Lorenzo-Rial M., & Pérez-Rodríguez U. (2021) The challenge of global environmental change: Attitudinal trends in teachers-in-training. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020493
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Venkatesan M., Barot R., Chinni A., Regenstrief A., Singh P., Sucov J., & Sun J. (2023) Documentary film and institutional behavioral change: A student-driven mobilization for sustainability. In Leal Filho W., Lange Salvia A., Pallant E., Choate B., & Pearce K. (Eds.), Educating the sustainability leaders of the future (pp. 311–324). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑22856‑8_18
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Watson L. W. Ed. (2023) Exploring personhood in contemporary times: From leadership to philosophy. IGI Global.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Webster K. (2015) The circular economy: A wealth of flows (2nd ed.). Ellen MacArthur Foundation Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Worth K. (2021) Miseducation: How climate change is taught in America. Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Xu L., Arenas J., & Charath A. (2023) Building youth voices: Media created by youth for youth. In Beach R. & Smith B. (Eds.), Youth created media on the climate crisis: Hear our voices (pp. 251–270). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Young R. L. Ed. (2022) Literature as a lens for climate change: Using narratives to prepare the next generation. Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte202332613
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error