Skip to content
2018
Volume 55, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

The discourse of literary analysis is dynamic and ideological, shifting as writers navigate conventions and practices to meet their rhetorical purposes in particular contexts. While scholars have engaged ideological analyses of students learning to write literary analysis essays in university contexts, few studies have documented student writers’ experiences of disciplinary enculturation in secondary English language arts classrooms. In this case study, we address this absence by using the concept of stance to examine how the identity of one student—Katarina—informed her interactions with the discourse of literary analysis as it was understood and instantiated by her teacher. In our analysis of essay drafts, field notes, artifacts, and interview transcripts, we found that the convergence of Katarina’s identity as a creative and emotional person and writer with the possibilities for selfhood afforded to her in this context contributed to her stance toward the discourse. We examine points of tension across two of Katarina’s essays that illuminate her ideological struggles as she navigated the discourse of her classroom. Our findings point to the utility of stance as a conceptual tool for researchers and educators to take a critical perspective on students’ writing processes in the context of the ideologically laden, authoritative demands of secondary classrooms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131258
2021-05-15
2023-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aukerman M. (2006)  Who’s afraid of the big “bad answer”?. Educational Leadership, 64 (2), 37–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin M. M. (1981)  The dialogic imagination: Four essays Emerson C. Holquist M. . University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck S. W. (2006)  Subjectivity and inter-subjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 40 (4), 413–460.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck S. W. (2009)  Individual goals and academic literacy: Integrating authenticity and explicitness. English Education, 41 (3), 259–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck S. W. Jeffery J. V. (2009)  Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. Journal of Literacy Research, 41 (2), 228–272.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beerits L. (2016)  Understanding I: The rhetorical variety of self-references in college literature papers. College Composition and Communication, 67 (4), 550–575.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brookins G. (1988)  Making the honor roll: A Black parent’s perspective on private education. Slaughter D. Johnson D. . Visible now: Blacks in private schools, 12–20. Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carbone P. M. Orellana M. F. (2010)  Developing academic identities: Persuasive writing as a tool to strengthen emergent academic identities. Research in the Teaching of English, 44 (3), 292–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Creswell J. W. (2007)  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches 2nd Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Delpit L. D. (2006)  Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom, New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DiPardo A. Storms B. A. Selland M. (2011)  Seeing voices: Assessing writerly stance in the NWP Analytic Writing Continuum. Assessing Writing, 16 (3), 170–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fahnestock J. Secor M. (1991)  The rhetoric of literary criticism. Bazerman C. Paradis J. . Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities, 76–96. University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fields S. S. (2017)  Analytical writing and identity development of diverse adolescents in an alternative high school preparatory academy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Boston University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Frankel K. K. (2013)  Revisiting the role of explicit genre instruction in the classroom. Journal of Education, 193 (1), 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Freedman S. W. Ball A. (2004)  Ideological becoming: Bakhtinian concepts to guide the study of language, literacy, and learning. Ball A. F. Freedman S. W. . Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning, 3, 33 Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee J. P. (1996)  Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. 2nd Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Greenhow C. Gleason B. (2012)  Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum, 76 (4), 464–478.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harman R. M. Khote N. (2018)  Critical SFL praxis with bilingual youth: Disciplinary instruction in a third space. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15 (1), 63–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ivanicˇ R. (1998)  Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee C. D. (1995)  A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (4), 608–630.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Levine S. (2014)  Making interpretation visible with an affect-based strategy. Reading Research Quarterly 49 3 283–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levine S. Horton W. (2015)  Helping high school students read like experts: Affective evaluation, salience, and literary interpretation. Cognition and Instruction, 33 (2), 125–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewis W. E. Ferretti R. P. (2011)  Topoi and literary interpretation: The effects of a critical reading and writing intervention on high school students’ analytic literary essays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36 (4), 334–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marlatt R. (2018)  Literary analysis using Minecraft: An Asian American youth crafts her literacy identity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62 (1), 55–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell J. (1984)  Typicality and the case study. Ellen R. F. . Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct, 237–241. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Patton M. Q. (2002)  Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Penrose A. M. Geisler C. (1994)  Reading and writing without authority College Composition and Communication, 45 (4), 505–520.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Prior P. (1995)  Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: A case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English, 29 (3), 288–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rainey E. C. (2017)  Disciplinary literacy in English language arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of literary reading and reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 52 (1), 53–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Roozen K. (2009)  “Fan fic-ing” English studies: A case study exploring the interplay of vernacular literacies and disciplinary engagement. Research in the Teaching of English, 44 (2), 136–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenblatt L. M. (2013)  The transactional theory of reading and writing. Alver-mann D. E. Unrau N. J. Ruddell R. B. . Theoretical models and processes of reading 6th 923–956 International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Seidman I. (2006)  Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Smagorinsky P. (2008)  The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25 (3), 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith B. E. (2018)  Composing for affect, audience, and identity: Toward a multidimensional understanding of adolescents’ multimodal composing goals and designs. Written Communication, 35 (2), 182–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Storm S. Rainey E. C. (2018)  Striving toward woke English teaching and learning. English Journal, 107 (6), 95–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Taylor L. (2019)  Discursive stance as a pedagogical tool: Negotiating literate identities in writing conferences. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798419838596
    [Google Scholar]
  37. West K. C. (2008)  Weblogs and literary response: Socially situated identities and hybrid social languages in English class blogs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51 (7), 588–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilder L. (2002)  “Get comfortable with uncertainty”: A study of the conventional values of literary analysis in an undergraduate literature course. Written Communication, 19 (1), 175–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilder L. (2005)  “The rhetoric of literary criticism” revisited: Mistaken critics, complex contexts, and social justice. Written Communication, 22 (1), 76–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilder L. Wolfe J. (2009)  Sharing the tacit rhetorical knowledge of the literary scholar: The effects of making disciplinary conventions explicit in undergraduate writing about literature courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 44 (2), 170–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Williamson T. (2019)  Authoring selves in school: Adolescent writing identity. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68 (1), 250–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yi Y. (2010)  Adolescent multilingual writers’ transitions across in- and out-of-school writing contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19 (1), 17–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yin R. K. (2017)  Case study research and applications: Design and methods, Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131258
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131258
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error