Skip to content
2018
  1. NCTE Publications Home
  2. All Journals
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Volume 55, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 55, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
file format pdf download PDF
side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

There is a particular urgency in this political moment to understand children’s experiences with current events. Drawing from data generated following the 2016 presidential election, this paper focuses on three racially and linguistically diverse children’s persuasive compositions. Within a critical literacies writing unit focused on (im)migrant experiences, children called on legislators to act on the Republican administration’s policies. Building on the understanding that all literacies are political and that teaching and learning are value-laden tasks, the author engaged a cultural rhetorics orientation—grounded in the understanding of texts, bodies, materials, and ideas as interconnected aspects of communication—for data generation and analysis. The findings highlight how children strategically employed rhetoric to persuade. They used logos, pathos, and ethos, as well as story, a central tool for meaning-making and building practices in the world. Ultimately, this study demonstrates how children, when properly supported, can agentively participate in critical literacies and act on real-world politics. Through the stories of young children, this study emphasizes what children have to tell adults and what a cultural rhetorics orientation, through its emphasis on story, enables literacies researchers and educators to understand about children’s composing.

© 2021 by the National Council of Teachers of English. Printed in the United States of America
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131186
2021-02-15
2023-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/rte/55/3/researchintheteachingofenglish31186.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131186&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alvermann D. E. Hagood M. C. (2000)  Critical media literacy: Research, theory, and practice in “new times.”. Journal of Educational Research, 93 (3), 193–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson D. D. (2008)  The elementary persuasive letter: Two cases of situated competency, strategy, and agency. Research in the Teaching of English, 42 (3), 270 314.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrod Y. (2014)  “¿Tu te acuerdas de ganchulinas?”: Longitudinal research with young emergent bilinguals. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15 (2), 94–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett M. Buchanan-Barrow E. (2005)  Emergent themes in the study of children’s understanding of society. Barrett M. Buchanan-Barrow E. . Children’s understanding of society: Studies in developmental psychology, 1–16. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bratta P. Powell M. (2016)  Introduction to the special issue: Entering the cultural rhetorics conversations. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture, 21 enculturation.net/entering-the-cultural-rhetorics-conversations
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brownell C. J. 2017a Language identity in the elementary English language arts classroom. The Reading Teacher, 71 (2), 225–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownell C. J. 2017b Mandated curricula as figured world: A case-study of identity, power, and writing in elementary English language arts. English Teaching: Practice & Critiqu, 16 (2), 252–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brownell C. J. (2018)  (Re)Imagining children’s writing: Creative language play(giarism) in the elementary English language arts classroom. Language Arts, 65 (4), 218–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brownell C. J. 2019a “I feel terrible . . .”: Storying power differentials across relationships in the elementary English language arts classroom. Perspectives and Provocations in Early Childhood Education,, 8 www.earlychildhoodeducationassembly.com/uploads/1/6/6/2/16621498/brownell_2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brownell C. J. 2019b Sound the alarm!: Disrupting sonic resonances of an elementary English language arts classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 49 (5), 551 572.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchholz B. A. (2015)  Drama as serious (and not so serious) business: Critical play, generative conflicts, and moving bodies in a 1:1 classroom. Language Arts, 93 (1), 7–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Campano G. Ghiso M. P. SáNchez, L. (2013)  “Nobody knows the . . . amount of a person”: Elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48 (1), 98–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cobos C. Raquel RíOs G. Johnson Sackey D. Sano-Franchini J. Haas A. M. (2018)  Interfacing cultural rhetorics: A history and a call. Rhetoric Review, 37 (2), 139 154.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Comber B. Nixon H. (2014)  Critical literacy across the curriculum: Learning to read, question, and rewrite designs.. Pandya J. Z. ÁVILA J. . Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts, 83–97. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De LeóN J. (2015)  California series in public anthropology, 36 The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail, University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickson J. D. Williams C. (2016)  November 10 Royal Oak middle school students chant “Build that wall” DetroitNews. www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/oakland-county/2016/11/10/royal-oak-students-chant-build-wall-cafeteria/93581592/
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dutro E. Haberl E. (2018)  Blurring material and rhetorical walls: Children writing the border/lands in a second-grade classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 50 (2), 167–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dyson A. H. (1997)  Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy, Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dyson A. H. (2013)  Rewriting the basics: Literacy learning in children’s cultures, Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dyson A. H. (2018)  A sense of belonging: Writing (righting) inclusion and equity in a child’s transition to school. Research in the Teaching of English, 52 (3), 236–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dyson A. H. Genishi C. (2005)  On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research, Teachers College Press; National Council for Research on Language and Literacy.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Exley B. Woods A. Dooley K. (2014)  Thinking critically in the land of princesses and giants: The affordances and challenges of critical approaches in the early years. Pandya J. Z. Ávila J. . Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts, 59–70. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Freire P. Macedo D. (1987)  Literacy: Reading the word and the world, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Geertz C. (1973)  Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Lincoln Y. S. Denzin N. K. . Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief, 143–168. AltaMira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ghiso M. P. (2015)  Arguing from experience: Young children’s embodied knowledge and writing as inquiry. Journal of Literacy Research, 47 (2), 186–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghiso M. P. Low D. E. (2013)  Students using multimodal literacies to surface micronarratives of United States immigration. Literacy, 47 (1), 26–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haas A. M. (2012)  Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26 (3), 277–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Halvorsen A. L. (2017)  Children’s learning and understanding in their social world. Manfra M. M. Bolick C. M. . The Wiley handbook of social studies research, 385–413. Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Heath S. B. (1983)  Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hermann-Wilmarth J. M. Lannen R. Ryan C. L. (2017)  Critical literacy and transgender topics in an upper elementary classroom: A portrait of possibility. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 13 (1), 15–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Horner B. Selfe C. Lockridge T. (2015)  Translinguality, transmodality, and difference: Exploring dispositions and change in language and learning, Digital monograph Intermez zo. ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1083&context=faculty
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hull G. A. Stornaiuolo A. Sahni U. (2010)  Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 42 (4), 331–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Janks H. (2010)  Literacy and power, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Janks H. Vasquez V. (2011)  Critical literacy revisited: Writing as critique. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10 (1), 1 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jewitt C. Kress G. (2003)  Introduction. Jewitt C. Kress G. . Multimodal literacy, 1–18. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones S. (2006)  Girls, social class, and literacy: What teachers can do to make a difference, Heinemann Educational Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kress G. (1999)  English at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. Hawisher G. Selfe C. . Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies, 66–88. Utah State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Larson J. (2006)  Multiple literacies, curriculum, and instruction in early childhood and elementary school. Theory Into Practice, 45 (4), 319–329.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Larson J. Marsh J. (2005)  Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching, SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Luke A. (2014)  Defining critical literacy. Pandya J. Z. Ávila J. . Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts, 19–31. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Luke A. Freebody P. (1999)  Further notes on the Four Resources model. Reading Online
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Michael A. (2016)  November 8 What do we tell the children?, HuffPost www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/what-should-we-tell-the children_us_5822aa90e4b0334571e0a30b
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mignolo W. D. (2007)  Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21 2-3 449–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. SaldañA J. (2013)  Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook 3rd ed SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mirra N. Garcia A. (2017)  Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41 (1), 136–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Moll L. C. Amanti C. Neff D. Gonzalez N. (1992)  Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31 (2), 132–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mukavetz A. M. R. (2014)  Towards a cultural rhetorics methodology: Making research matter with multi-generational women from the Little Traverse Bay Band. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization,, 5 (1), 108–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH (2016)  Professional knowledge for the teaching of writing. Position statement, www.ncte.org/positions/statements/teaching-writing
    [Google Scholar]
  49. National Council Of Teachers Of English (2017)  August 15 There is no apolitical classroom: Resources for teaching in these times. www2.ncte.org/blog/2017/08/there-is-no-apolitical-classroom-resources-for-teaching-in-these-times/
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pandya J. Z., áVila J. . (2014)  Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Paris D. (2012)  Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41 (3), 93–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Paris D. Winn M. T. (2014)  Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities, SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Parks A. N. (2020)  Centering children in mathematics education classroom research. American Educational Research Journal, 57 (4), 1443–1484.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Powell M. (2012)  2012 CCCC chair’s address: Stories take place: A performance in one act. College Composition and Communication, 64 (2), 383–406.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Powell M. Levy D. Riley-Mukavetz A. Brooks-Gillies M. Novotny M. Fischferguson J. (2014)  Our story begins here: Constellating cultural rhetorics. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture 18 enculturation.net/our-story-begins-here
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Shipka J. (2005)  A multimodal task-based framework for composing. College Composition and Communication, 57 (2), 277–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Shipka J. (2006)  Sound engineering: Toward a theory of multimodal soundness. Computers and Composition, 23 (3), 355–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Shipka J. (2009)  Negotiating rhetorical, material, methodological, and technological difference: Evaluating multimodal designs. College Composition and Communication, 61 (1), W343 W366.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Shipka J. (2011)  Toward a composition made whole, University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Shipka J. (2016)  Transmodality in/and processes of making: Changing dispositions and practice. College English, 78 (3), 250–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Skerrett A. (2013)  Building multiliterate and multilingual writing practices and identities. English Education, 45 (4), 322–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Skerrett A. Bomer R. (2013)  Recruiting languages and lifeworlds for border-crossing compositions. Research in the Teaching of English, 47 (3), 313–337.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Souto-Manning M. Yoon H. S. (2018)  Rethinking early literacies: Reading and rewriting worlds, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Street B. V. (1984)  Cambridge studies in oral and literate culture. 9 Literacy in theory and practice, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Taylor P. (2014)  April 10 The next America. Pew Research Center www.pewresearch.org/next-america/
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Tonatiuh D. (2013)  Pancho Rabbit and the coyote: A migrant’s tale, Abrams Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Vasquez V. (2004)  Negotiating critical literacies with young children, Routledge Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wessel-Powell C. Buchholz B. A. Brownell C. J. (2019)  Policying time and curriculum: How teachers critically negotiate restrictive policies. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18 (2), 170 187.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wohlwend K. E. (2009)  Damsels in discourse: Girls consuming and producing identity texts through Disney princess play. Reading Research Quarterly 44 (1), 57–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wohlwend K. E. (2011)  Playing their way into literacies: Reading, writing, and belong-ing in the early childhood classroom, Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Wohlwend K. E. (2013)  Playing star wars under the teacher’s radar: detecting kinder-gartner’s action texts and embodied literacies. Perspectives and Provocations in Early Childhood Education, 105–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Woodard R. Kline S. (2016)  Lessons from sociocultural writing research for implementing the Common Core State Standards. The Reading Teacher, 70 (2), 207–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yoon H. (2013)  Rewriting the curricular script: Teachers and children translating writing practices in a kindergarten classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 48 (2), 148–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Yoon H. S. (2014)  Can I play with you? The intersection of play and writing in a kindergarten classroom. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15 (2), 109–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Yoon H. S. (2020)  Critically literate citizenship: Moments and movements in second grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 52 (3), 293–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Yoon H. S. Templeton T. N. (2019)  The practice of listening to children: The challenges of hearing children out in an adult-regulated world. Harvard Educational Review, 89, 55–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Zapotosky M. (2017)  February 6 Federal appeals court decides to schedule hearing on Trump travel order. Washington Post www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/opposition-to-trump-travel-ban-grows-as-key-court-decision-looms/2017/02/06/d766ec7c-ec74-11e6-9662-6eedf1627882_story.html?utm_term=.2fff82f5074b
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131186
Loading
Children’s Rhetoric in an Era of (Im)Migration: Examining Critical Literacies Using a Cultural Rhetorics Orientation in the Elementary Classroom
Research in the Teaching of English 55, 265 (2021); https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131186
/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131186
/content/journals/10.58680/rte202131186
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error