f Playful Practices: Reimagining Literacy Teacher Education through Game-Based Curriculum Design

References

1. Boldt G. Lewis C. Leander K. M. (2015)  Moving, feeling, desiring, teaching. Research in the Teaching of English, 49 (4), 430–431.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Braun V. Clarke V. (2006)  Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bruner J. (1976)  The process of education. Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cole M. Engeströ M. Y. (1993)  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Salomon G. . Distributed cognitions:Psychology and educational considerations, 1–46. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davis B. Tu X. Georgen C. Danish J. A. Enyedy N. (2019)  The impact of different play activity designs on students’ embodied learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 120 9-10 611–639.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Garcia A. Gomez M. (2017)  Player professional development: A case study of teacher resiliency within a community of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66 (1), 349–359.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gee J. (2013)  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy 2nd Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gutiérrez K. D. Cortes K. Cortez A. Di-GIACOMO D. Higgs J. Johnson P. Lizárraga J. R. Mendoza E. Tien J. Vakil S. (2017)  Replacing representation with imagination: Finding ingenuity in everyday practices. Review of Research in Education, 41 (1), 30–60.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gutiérrez K. D. Vossoughi S. (2010)  Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 1-2 100–117.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hagood M. C. Alvermann D. e. Heronhruby A. (2010)  Bring it to class: Unpacking pop culture in literacy learning. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Henricks T. S. (2006)  Play reconsidered: Sociological perspectives on human expression. University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Holzman L. (2014)  “Vygotskian-izing” psychotherapy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21 (3), 184–199.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Honeyford M. A. Boyd K. (2015)  Learning through play. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59 (1), 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jacobs G. E. (2013)  Reimagining multiliteracies: A response to Leander and Boldt. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57 (4), 270–273.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jenkins H. Kelley W. Clinton K. Mcwilliams J. Pitts-WILEY R. Reilly E. (2013)  Reading in a participatory culture: Remixing Moby-Dick in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johnson L. L. Chisam J. Smagorinsky P. Wargo K. (2018)  Beyond publication: Social action as the ultimate stage of a writing process. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kaufmann D. Johnson S. M. Kardos S. M. Liu E. Peske H. G. (2002)  “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104 (2), 273–300.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kim G. M. (2016)  Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self-representations in an online forum. Reading Research Quarterly, 51 (2), 199–219.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kim Y. J. Pavlov O. (2019)  Game-based structural debriefing. Information and Learning Sciences, 120 9-10 567–588.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lewis ELLISON T. Solomon M. (2018)  Digital play as purposeful productive literacies in African American boys. The Reading Teacher, 71 (4), 495–500.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Medina C. L. Costa M. D. (2014)  Cultural production of telenovelas’ dramatic worlds. Medina C. L. Wohlwend K. E. . Making, remaking, and reimagining the everyday: Play, creativity, and popular media, 51–68. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. Saldaña J. (2014)  Qualitative data analysis, SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nelson M. E. Hull G. A. Roche-SMITH J. (2008)  Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25 (4), 415–440.
    [Google Scholar]
24. NEW LONDON GROUP (1996)  A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), 60–92.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Orellana M. F. (2016)  Immigrant childrenin transcultural spaces: Language, learning, and love, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Prior P. A. (2010)  Remaking IO: Semiotic remediation in the design process. Prior P. A. Hengst J. A. . Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice, 206–234. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Prior P. A. Hengst J. A. (2010)  Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice, Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Prior P. Hengst J. Roozen K. Shipka J. (2006)  “I’ll be the sun”: From reported speech to semiotic remediation practices. Text & Talk, 26 (6), 733–766.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Reich J. Ito M. (2017)  From Good Intentions to Real Outcomes: Equity by Design in Learning Technologies. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rieber R. W. Carton A. S. (1987)  The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky:, 1 Problems of general psychology Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sefton-GREEN J. Sinker R. (2000)  Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shute V. J. Ventura M. Torres R. (2013)  Formative evaluation of studentsat Quest to Learn. International Journal of Learning and Media, 4 (1), 55–69.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Siyahhan S. Gaydos M. (2019)  Foregrounding play: An interdisciplinary dialogue on video games and learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 120 9-10 541–546.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Smagorinsky P. (2008)  The Method Sectionas Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports. Written Communication, 25 (3), 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Smagorinsky P. Cook L. Johnson T. (2003)  The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105 (8), 1399–1436.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Smith A. West-Puckett S. Cantrill C. Zamora M. (2016)  Remix as professional learning: Educators’ iterative literacy practicein CLMOOC. Education Sciences, 6 (1), Article 12
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stephen C. Edwards S. (2018)  Young children playing and learning in a digital age: Acultural and critical perspective, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Suits B. (1967)  What is a game?. Philosophy of Science, 34 (2), 148–156.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vasudevan L. (2015)  Multimodal play and adolescents: Notes on noticing laughter. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 11 (1), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Vygotsky L. S. (1978)  Mind in society: Thedevelopment of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wohlwend K. E. (2014)  Making, remaking, and reimagining the everyday: Play, creativity, and popular media, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wohlwend K. E. (2015)  Literacy playshop: New literacies, popular media, and play in theearly childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wohlwend K. E. Buchholz B. A. Medina C. L. (2018)  Playful literacies and practices of making in children’s imaginaries.. Mills K. A. Stornaiuolo A. Smith A. Pandya J. Z. . Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures, 136–147. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wohlwend K. Peppler K. (2015)  All rigor and no play is no way to improve learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 96 (8), 22–26.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Woodard R. Machado E. (2017)  Using video in urban elementary professional development to support digital media arts integration. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33 (2), 49–57.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Yates T. M. Marcelo A. K. (2014)  Through race-colored glasses: Preschoolers’ pretend play and teachers’ ratings of preschooler adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29 (1), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Yoon H. (2014)  Can I play with you? The intersection of play and writing in a kindergarten classroom. Contemporary Issues in Early Education, 15 (2), 109–121.
    [Google Scholar]