Multimodal Attitude in Digital Composition: Appraisal in Elementary English

References

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020)  Census: QuickStats search, Belconnen, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/Census?OpenDocument&ref=topBar
   [Google Scholar]
2. Australian Curriculum Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2016)  National assessment program: Writing, Retrieved fromhttps://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/writing
   [Google Scholar]
3. Australian Curriculum Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2018)  Understand how English works, Retrieved fromhttp://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/english/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Australian Curriculum Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2019)  Myschool: Find a School, Retrieved fromhttps://www.myschool.edu.au/home/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bartolo L.. (2017)  Uncovering the paradigm: Combining the old and the new in a 21st-century pedagogy for teaching film in English. English in Australia, 52(3), 43–50.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barton G. Unsworth L.. (2014)  Music, multiliteracies, and multimodality: Exploring the book and movie versions of Shaun Tan’s. The Lost Thing Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37, 1–21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boggs J. Petrie D.. (2008)  The art of watching films(7th ed.) McGraw-Hill.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boske C.. (2012)  Aspiring school leaders addressing social justice through art making. Journal of School Leadership, 22(1), 116–146.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Burn A.. (2017)  The kineikonic mode: Towards a multimodal approach to movingimage media. Jewitt C.. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis2nd ed, 375–385 Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burn A. Parker D.. (2003)  Tiger’s big plan: Multimodality and the moving image. Jewitt C. Kress G.. (Eds.), Multimodal literacy, 56–72 Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chen Y.. (2010)  The semiotic construal of attitudinal curriculum goals: Evidence from EFL textbooks in China. Linguistics and Education, 21, 60–74.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Davydov D. Zech E. Luminet O.. (2011)  Affective context of sadness and physiological response patterns. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Durlak J. Weissberg R. P. Dymnicki A. B. Taylor R. D. Schellinger K. B.. (2011)  The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Forgas J. P. Moylan S.. (1987)  After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 467–477.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gabert-Quillen C. Bartolini A. Abravanel E. Sanislow E.. (2015)  Ratings for emotion film clips. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 773–787.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gibbons D.. (2010)  Tracing the paths of moving artefacts in youth media production. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 9, 8–21.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gronstad A.. (2016)  A film and the ethical imagination, Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday M. Matthiessen C.. (2014)  Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar(4th ed.) Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halverson E.. (2010)  Film as identity exploration: A multimodal analysis of youth-produced films. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2352–2378.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Husbye N. Vander Zanden S.. (2015)  Composing film: Multimodality and production in elementary classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 54, 109–116.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jensen C.. (2014)  Reduced narration, intensified emotion: The film trailer. Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind, 8(1), 105–125.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jewitt C.. (2017)  Different approaches to multimodality. Jewitt C.. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis2nd ed., 31–43 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kamir O.. (2005)  Why “law-and-film” and what does it actually mean? A perspective. Continuum, 19, 255–278.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kress G.. (2017)  What is mode?. Jewitt C.. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis2nd ed, 60–75 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kress G. Van Leeuwen T.. (2006)  Reading images: The grammar of visual design(2nd ed.) Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lange P.. (2014)  Kids on YouTube: Technical identities and digital literacies, Left Coast Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lewis C. Tierney J. D.. (2013)  Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a racerelated discussion. Linguistics and Education, 24, 289–304.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lisec J. Dezuanni M.. (2018)  Video making to support science investigations. Teaching Science, 64(4), 10–14.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Martin J. White P. R. R.. (2005)  The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mills K. A. Bellocchi A. Patulny R. Dooley J.. (2017)  Indigenous children’s multimodal communication of emotions through visual imagery. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 40, 95–108.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mills K.A. Stone B. Unsworth L. Friend L.. (2020)  Multimodal language of attitude in digital composition. Written Communication, 37(2), 135–166.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mills K. A. Unsworth L.. (2018)  iPad animations: Powerful practices for adolescents’ multimodal literacy and emotional language. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61, 609–620.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mills K. A. Unsworth L. Barton G.. (2019)  The digital mediation of emotions in late modernity. Patulny R. Bellocchi A. Olson R. E. Khorana S. Mckenzie J. Peterie M.. (Eds.), Emotions in late modernity: Routledge studies in the sociology of emotions, 190–208 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mills K. A. Unsworth L. Bellocchi A. Park J. Ritchie S.. (2014)  Children’s emotions and multimodal appraisal of places: Walking with the camera. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37, 171–181.
    [Google Scholar]
35. O’Hallaron C. Schleppegrell M.. (2016)  “Voice” in children’s science arguments: Aligning assessment criteria with genre and discipline. Assessing Writing, 30, 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Onwuegbuzie A. Leech N. Collins K.. (2010)  Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 15, 696–726.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pandya J. Z. Mills K. A.. (2019)  Bakhtin and the carnival: Humour in school children’s film making. Language and Education, 33, 544–559.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Parkinson D.. (2012)  100 ideas that changed film, Laurence King.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Plantinga C.. (2010)  “I followed the rules, and they all loved you more”: Moral judgment and attitudes toward fictional characters in film. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 34(1), 34–51.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ranker J.. (2008)  Composing across multiple media: A case study of digital video production in a fifth-grade classroom. Written Communication, 25, 196–234.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Raworth K. Sweetman C. Narayan S. Rowlands J. Hopkins A.. (2012)  Conducting semistructured interviews, Oxfam.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rodda E.. (2004)  Rowan of Rin: The journey, Scholastic.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Schleppegrell M.. (2013)  The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63, 153–170.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schutz P. Pekrun R.. (2007)  Emotions in education, Elsevier Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Semendeferi I.. (2014)  Feelings and ethics education: The film Dear Scientists. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15, 100–102.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Smithikrai C.. (2016)  Effectiveness of teaching with movies to promote positive characteristics and behaviors. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 522–530.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stafford T.. (2011)  Teaching visual literacy in the primary classroom: Comic books, film, television and picture narratives, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stornaiuolo A. Hull G. Hall M.. (2018)  Cosmopolitan practices, networks, and flows of literacies. Mills K. A. Stornaiuolo A. Pandya J. Z. Smith A.. (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures, xxiv–1 Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Suri H.. (2011)  Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Thein A. Guise M. Sloan D.. (2015)  Examining emotional rules in the English classroom: A critical discourse analysis of one student’s literary responses in two academic contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 200–223.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Unsworth L.. (2014)  Point of view in picture books and animated film adaptations: Informing critical multimodal comprehension and composition pedagogy. Djonov E. Zhao S.. (Eds.), Critical multimodal studies of popular culture, 201–216 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Unsworth L. Mills K.A.. (2020)  English language teaching of attitude and emotion in digital multimodal composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van Leeuwen T.. (2017)  Color: Code, mode, modality. Jewitt C.. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis2nd ed., 397–409 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. West T.. (2017)  Music and designed sounds. Jewitt C.. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis2nd ed., 410–418 Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Worland S.. (2015)  Paper planes, Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]