Skip to content
2018
Volume 55, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte202030901
2020-08-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnold D. (1993)  Colonizing the body: State medicine and epidemic disease in nineteenthcentury India, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atwell N. (1987)  In the middle: Reading, writing, and learning from adolescents, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2012)  Draft Australian curriculum for English, Retrieved from, https://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/English-.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad K. (2007)  Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bereiter C. (2002)  Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, 9 (3), 321–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bevan B. Gutwill J. P. Petrich M. Wilkinson K. (2015)  Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99, 98–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blikstein P. (2013)  Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. Walter Herrmann J. BüChing C.. (Eds.), FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors, 203–222. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bogdan R. Biklen S. (2007)  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown T. (2008)  Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Calabrese Barton A. Tan E. (2018)  A longitudinal study of equity-oriented STEMrich making among youth from historically marginalized communities. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 761–800.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Calkins L. (2008)  Units of study for primary writing: A yearlong curriculum, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Campano G. Ghiso M. P. Welch B. (2015)  Ethical and professional norms in community-based research. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 29–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Campano G. Ghiso M. P. Yee M. Pantoja A. (2013)  Toward community research and coalition literacy practices for educational justice. Language Arts, 90, 314–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Campano G. Nichols T. P. Player G. D. (2020)  Multimodal critical inquiry: Nurturing decolonial imaginaries Moje E. B. Afflerbach P. Enciso P. Lesaux N. K.. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 5, 137–152. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins P. H. (1990)  Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Costanza-Chock S. (2020)  Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Countryman M. (2006)  Up south: Civil rights and black power in Philadelphia, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cowan R. S. (1984)  More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cross N. (2001)  Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17 (3), 49–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuban L. (1986)  Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cutler L. Graham S. (2008)  Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dear P. JasanoffS. (2010)  Dismantling boundaries in science and technology studies. Isis, 101, 759–774.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Delpit L. (1988)  The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Delpit L. (2006)  Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom, New York: New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dressman M. Mccarthey S. Prior P. (2012)  Continuity and innovation in literacy research. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 109–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Edgerton D. (1999)  From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. History and Technology, 16, 111–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Edwards P. Jackson S. Bowker G. C. WilliamsR. (2009)  An agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10 (5), 365–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ehret C. Hollett T. (2014)  Embodied composition in real virtualities: Adolescents’ literacy practices and felt experiences moving with digital, mobile devices in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 428–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Erickson F. (2004)  Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 486–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Flower L. Hayes J. (1981)  A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gee J. P. Hull G. Lankshear C. (1996)  The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism, Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ghiso M. P. Campano G. Simon R. (2013)  Grassroots inquiry: Reconsidering the location of innovation. Language Arts, 91, 105–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Graham S. Perin D. (2007)  A metaanalysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Graves D. (1983)  Writing: Teachers and children at work, Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gutiérrez K. Vossoughi S. (2010)  Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediating praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Halverson E. Sheridan K. (2014)  The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 495–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Harding S. (2008)  Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, modernities, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Harvey D. (2014)  Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Heath S. B. Street B. (2008)  On ethnography. New York: Teachers College Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Herr K. Anderson G. (2005)  The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Honey M. Kanter D. (2013)  Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hughes T. P (1983)  Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880-1930, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hull G. Katz M. (2006)  Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 43–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jewitt C. (2008)  Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jewitt C. Moss G. Cardini A. (2007)  Pace, interactivity, and multimodality in teachers’ design of text for interactive whiteboards in the secondary classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 303–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kafai Y. Fields D. Searle K. (2014)  Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 532–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim Y. E. Edouard K. Alderfer K. Smith B. K. (2018)  Making culture: A national study of education makerspaces, Philadelphia: Drexel University ExCITe Center, Retrieved from, https://drexel.edu/excite/engagement/learning-innovation/making-culture-report/study-process/
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kinloch V. (2005)  Poetry, literacy, and creativity: Fostering effective learning strategies in an urban classroom. English Education, 37, 96–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kress G. (1999)  Participation and difference: The role of language in producing a culture of innovation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 12, 127–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Latour B. (1987)  Science in action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Leander K. Boldt G. (2013)  Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 22–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lensmire T. (2000)  Powerful writing, responsible teaching, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Low D. E. (2017)  Students contesting “colormuteness” through critical inquiries into comics. English Journal, 106 (4), 19–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lynch T. (2015)  Where the machine stops: Software as reader and the rise of new literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 297–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Marsh J. Arnseth H. C. Kumpulainen K. (2018)  Maker literacies and maker citizenship in the MakEY (Makerspaces in the Early Years) Project. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2 (3), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin L. Dixon C. Betser S. (2018)  Iterative design toward equity: Youth repertoires of practice in a high school makerspace. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51, 36–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Maton R. Nichols T. P. (2018)  Mobilizing public alternative schools for postneoliberal futures: Legacies of critical hope in Philadelphia and Toronto. Policy Futures in Education, 18, 159–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Mills K. A. Comber B. (2013)  Space, place, and power: The spatial turn in literacy research. Hall K. Cremin T. Comber B. Moll L. C.. (Eds.), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning, and culture, 412–423. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Moje E. (2009)  A call for new research on new and multiliteracies. Research in the Teaching of English, 43, 348–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Moorefield-Lang H. (2015)  Change in the making: Makerspaces and the ever-changing landscape of libraries. TechTrends, 59 (3), 107–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mort P. Cornell F. (1941)  American schools in transition: How our schools adapt their practices to changing needs, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Murray D. (1972)  Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 71, 11–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Nascimento S. PóLvora A. (2018)  Maker cultures and the prospects for technological action. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 927–946.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. National Economic Council, Council of Economic Advisers, & Office of Science and Technology Policy (2011)  A strategy for American innovation: Securing our economic growth and prosperity, Retrieved from, https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo4137/InnovationStrategy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  65. National Writing Project (2013)  July Writers at work: Making and connected learning—A Connectedlearning.tv webinar series, Retrieved from, http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/4139
    [Google Scholar]
  66. New London Group (1996)  A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Nichols T. P. Coleman J. J. (2020)  Feeling worlds: Affective imaginaries and the making of “democratic” literacy classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication, Retrieved fromhttps://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19362722
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Nichols T. P. Lui D. (2019)  Learning by doing: The tenuous alliance of the “Maker Movement” and education reform. Huntsinger J. Schrock A. . (Eds.), Making our world: The hacker and maker movements in context, 3–20. New York: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Pea R. (2004)  The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Resnik H. (1970)  Turning on the system: War in the Philadelphia public schools. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Rodney W. (1972)  How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Rowsell J. (2013)  Working with multimodality. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Russell A. Vinsel L. (2018)  After innovation, turn to maintenance. Technology and Culture, 59, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Selwyn N. (2016)  Education and technology: Key issues and debates, New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sheridan M. Rowsell J. (2010)  Design literacies: Learning and innovation in the digital age. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Star S. L. (1999)  The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 377–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Stornaiuolo A. Nichols T. P. (2018)  Making publics: Mobilizing audiences in high school makerspaces. Teachers College Record, 120 (8), 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Stornaiuolo A. Nichols T. P. Vasudevan V. (2018)  Building spaces for literacy in schools: Mapping the emergence of a literacy makerspace. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17, 357–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Stornaiuolo A. Smith A. Phillips N. (2017)  Developing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research, 49, 68–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Street B. V. (1995)  Social literacies, London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Thomas A. (2014)  Making makers: Kids, tools, and the future of innovation. Sebastopol, CA: Maker Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Vee A. (2013)  Understanding computer programming as literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 1 (2), 42–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Vossoughi S. Hooper P. K. Escudé M. (2016)  Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86, 206–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Vossoughi S. Vakil S. (2018)  Toward what ends? A critical analysis of militarism, equity, and STEM education. Ali A. Buenavista T.. (Eds), Education at war: The fight for students of color in America’s public schools, 117–140. New York: Fordham University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Whitney A. E. Friedrich L. (2013)  Orientations for the teaching of writing: A legacy of the National Writing Project. Teachers College Record, 115 (7), 1–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Wiggins G. Mctighe J. (2005)  Understanding by design(2nd ed) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Williamson B. (2016)  Big data in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte202030901
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte202030901
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error