f Digital Discourse in Classrooms: Language Arts Teachers’ Reported Perceptions and Implementation

References

1. Alexander R. (2008)  Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk4th ed.. York, United Kingdom: Dialogos.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Applebee A. N. Langer J. A. Nystrand M. Gamoran A. (2003)  Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685–730.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asterhan C. S. C. (2015)  Introducing online dialogues in co-located classrooms: If, why, and how. Resnick L. B. Asterhan C. S. C. Clarke S. N.. (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue, 205–218. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin M. M. (1981)  The dialogic imagination: Four essays, (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bakhtin M. M. (1986)  The problem of speech genres. Emerson C. Holquist M. Mcgee V.(Eds.). (Trans.)Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barnes D. R. Britton J. N. Rosen H. (1971)  Language, the learner and the school, London: Penguin Books.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boyd M. P. Markarian W. C. (2015)  Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 272–296.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Castells M. (1996)  The rise of the network society, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caughlan S. Juzwik M. Borsheim-Black C. Kelly S. Fine J. G. (2013)  English teacher candidates developing dialogically organized instructional practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 212–246.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cazden C. B. (2001)  Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cole M. (1996)  Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Collins D. (2003)  Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229–238.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cook C. Heath F. Thompson R. L. (2000)  A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Corbin J. Strauss A. (2007)  Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dysthe O. (1996)  The multivoiced classroom: Interactions of writing and classroom discourse. Written Communication, 13, 385–425.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eldred J. C. Fortune R. (1992)  Exploring the implications of metaphors for computer networks and hypermedia Hawisher G. E. Leblanc P.. (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age, 58–73. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Emerson R. M. Fretz R. I. Shaw L. L. (1995)  Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Erickson F. (2006)  Studying side by side: Collaborative action ethnography in educational research. Spindler G. Hammond L.. (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods and results, 235–257. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ertmer P. A. (2005)  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–39.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fecho B. Whitley J. J. Landry S. J. (2017)  Avoiding the cheapest seat in the house: Dialoguing through fear of dialogic practice. Hinchmann K. A. Appleman D. A.. (Eds.), Adolescent literacies: A handbook of practice-based research, 215–231. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Forte A. Bruckman A. (2009)  Writing, citing, and participatory media: Wikis as learning environments in the high school classroom. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1 4, 23–44.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Freedman S. W. Delp V. Crawford S. M. (2005)  Teaching English in untracked classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 62–126.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Freedman S. W. Hull G. A. Higgs J. Booten K. (2016)  Teaching writing in a digital and global age: Toward access, learning, and development for all. Bell C. Gitomer D.. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching5th ed., 1389–1449. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gutiérrez K. D. (1994)  How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education, 5, 335–365.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Higgs J. (2017)  Talking to learn in the 21st century: A national study of digital and face-to-face talk in K12 classrooms (Doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10608611)
    [Google Scholar]
26. Howe C. Abedin M. (2013)  Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 325–356.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Howe C. Hennessy S. Mercer N. Vrikki M. Wheatley L. (2019)  Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28, 462–512.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hull G. A. Stornaiuolo A. (2014)  Cosmopolitan literacies, social networks, and “proper distance”: Striving to understand in a global world. Curriculum Inquiry, 44, 15–44.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Johnson R. B. Onwuegbuzie A. J. (2004)  Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 7, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lankshear C. Knobel M. (2003)  New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lee C. D. (2001)  Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97–141.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Leont’Ev A. N. (1981)  Problems of the development of mind, Moscow: Progress.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Loncar M. Barrett N. E. Liu G. (2014)  Toward the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers & Education, 73, 93–110.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Major L. Warwick P. Rasmussen I. Ludvigsen S. Cook V. (2018)  Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1995–2028
    [Google Scholar]
35. Matusov E. (2011)  Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17, 99–119.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mehan H. (1979)  Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mercer N. Littleton K. (2007)  Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Merriam S. B. (1998)  Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Michaels S. O’Connor C. Resnick L. B. (2008)  Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283–297.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. (1994)  Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Murphy P. K. Greene J. Firetto C. Hendrick B. Li M. Montalbano C. Wei L. (2018)  Quality talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote high-level comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 1113–1160.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Murphy P. K. Wilkinson I. A. Soter A. O. (2011)  Instruction based on discussion. Mayer R. E. Alexander P. A.. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 382–407. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. National Council of Teachers Of English (2018)  Beliefs for integrating technology in the English language arts classroom [Position statement], Retrieved fromhttps://ncte.org/statement/beliefs-technology-preparation-english-teachers/
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nystrand M. Gamoran A. (1991)  Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Nystrand M. Gamoran A. Kachur R. Prendergast C. (1997)  Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Patterson Williams A. D. Athanases S. Z. Higgs J. M. Martinez D. C. . (in press) Developing an inner witness to notice for equity in the fleeting moments of talk for content learning. Equity & Excellence in Education
    [Google Scholar]
47. Philip T. Garcia A. (2013)  The importance of still teaching the iGeneration: New technologies and the centrality of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83, 300–319.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Reich J. Murnane R. Willett J. (2012)  The state of wiki usage in US K-12 schools leveraging web 2.0 data warehouses to assess quality and equity in online learning environments. Educational Researcher, 41 (1), 7–15.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Reznitskaya A. Anderson R. C. Mcnurlen B. Nguyen-Jahiel K. Archodidou A. Kim S.-Y. (2001)  Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155–175.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Roth W.-M. (2013)  An integrated theory of thinking and speaking that draws on Vygotsky and Bakhtin/Vološinov. Dialogic Pedagogy, 1 Retrieved fromhttp://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/dpj1/article/view/20
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sacks H. Schegloff E. A. Jefferson G. (1974)  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735
    [Google Scholar]
52. Scardamalia M. Bereiter C. (1994)  Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sinclair J. M. Coulthard M. (1975)  Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Smagorinsky P. (2008)  The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sullivan P. (2010)  Vygotskian dialectics and Bakhtinian dialogics: Consciousness between the authoritative and the carnivalesque. Theory & Psychology, 20, 362–378.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tharp R. G. Gallimore R. (1991)  Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. US Department of Education Office of Educational Technology (2017)  Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update, Retrieved from, https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vogler J. Schallert D. Park Y. Song K. Chiang Y. Jordan M. Sanders A. (2013)  A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in negotiation of meaning in an online discussion. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 211–239.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Vygotsky L. S. (1962)  Thought and language, (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Vygotsky L. S. (1978)  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Warschauer M. Matuchniak T. (2010)  New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179–225.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Wegerif R. (2013)  Dialogic: Education for the internet age. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wells G. Arauz R. M. (2006)  Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379–428.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wheeler S. Yeomans P. Wheeler D. (2008)  The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 987–995.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wilkinson I. A. G. Reznitskaya A. Bourd-Age K. Oyler J. Glina M. Drewry R. Nelson K. (2017)  Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31, 65–82.
    [Google Scholar]