Teaching with Digital Peer Response: Four Cases of Technology Appropriation, Resistance, and Transformation

References

1. BerkenkotterC..(1984) Student writers and their sense of authority over texts.College Composition and Communication35312–319.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BreuchL.-A. K..(2004) Virtual peer review: Teaching and learning about writing in online environmentsAlbanyState University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BreuchL.-A. K..(2015) Faculty preparation for OWI.HewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction349–387Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
   [Google Scholar]
4. BruffeeK. A..(1984) Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.”.College English46635–652.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChingK. L..(2007) Peer response in the composition classroom: An alternative genealogy.Rhetoric Review26303–319.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Conference On College Composition And Communication Committee For Best Practices In Online Writing Instruction.(2013) MarchA position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI)Retrieved fromhttps://prod-ncte-cdn.azureedge.net/nctefiles/groups/cccc/owiprinciples.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
7. De CerteauM..(1984) The practice of everyday lifeBerkeleyUniversity of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DipardoAFreedmanS. W..(1988) Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions.Review of Educational Research58119–149.
   [Google Scholar]
9. EhmannC.HewettB. L..(2015) OWI research considerationsHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction517–545Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
   [Google Scholar]
10. Eli Review. (N.D.-A).Eli ReviewRetrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eli Review. (N.D.-B).Eli Review learning resources: Debriefing a reviewRetrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/learn/tutorials/debriefing/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eli Review. (N.D.-C).Eli Review learning resources: Giving helpful feedback in Eli ReviewRetrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/learn/tutorials/students/giving-helpful-feedback/
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eli Review. (N.D.-D).Eli Review user guide: Review tasks [for instructors]Retrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/support/guides/instructor/tasks/review
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eli Review. (N.D.-E).Eli Review user guide: Review tasks [for students]Retrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/support/guides/student/review-tasks
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eli Review. (N.D.-F).Teacher development series #1: Feedback and revisionRetrieved fromhttps://elireview.com/content/td/feedback/
    [Google Scholar]
16. FreedmanS. W..(1992) Outside-in and inside-out: Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classes.Research in the Teaching of English2671–107.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GereA. R..(1987) Writing groups: History theory, and implications.CarbondaleSouthern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. GereA. R.AbbottR. D..(1985) Talking about writing: The language of writing groups.Research in the Teaching of English19362–381.
    [Google Scholar]
19. GereA. R.StevensR. S..(1985) The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revisionFreedmanS. W..(Ed.)The acquisition of written language: Response and revision85–105Norwood, NJAblex.
    [Google Scholar]
20. GriffinJ.MinterD..(2013) The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching.College Composition and Communication65140–161.
    [Google Scholar]
21. GriffinP.BelyaevaA.SoldatovaG.Velikov-Hamburg Collective.(1993) Creating and reconstituting contexts for educational interactions, including a computer programFormanE.MinickN.StoneC..(Eds.)Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development120–152New YorkOxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HaasC..(1996) Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacyMahwah, NJErlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hart-DavidsonW.GrabillJ.McleodM..(2011) US Patent No. 20110225241Washington, DCUS Patent and Trademark Office.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hart-DavidsonW.GrabillJ.McleodM..(2011) US Patent No. 20110225203Washington, DCUS Patent and Trademark Office.
    [Google Scholar]
25. HewettB. L..(2000) Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision.Computers and Composition17265–288.
    [Google Scholar]
26. HewettB. L..(2015) Grounding principles of OWIHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction33–92Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
27. HewettB. L.DepewK. E.(Eds.)(2015) Foundational practices of online writing instructionRetrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
28. LorettoA.DemartinoS.GodleyA..(2016) Secondary students’ perceptions of peer review of writing.Research in the Teaching of English51134–161.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MabritoM..(1991) Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response.Written Communication8509–532.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MccartheyS. J.MagnificoA. M.WoodardR.KlineS..(2014) Situating technology-facilitated feedback and revision: The case of TomPytashK. E.FerdigR. E..(Eds.)Exploring technology for writing and writing instruction152–170Hershey, PAInformation Science Reference.
    [Google Scholar]
31. McleodM.Hart-DavidsonW.GrabillJ..(2016) Theorizing and building online writing environments: User-centered design beyond the interfacePullmanG.BaotongG..(Eds.)Designing web-based applications for 21st century writing classrooms7–18New YorkRoutledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MelonconL.HarrisH..(2015) Preparing students for OWIHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction411–438Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
33. MerriamS. B..(2009) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementationWiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
34. MinterD..(2015) Administrative decisions for OWIHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction211–225Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
35. MishraP.KoehlerM. J..(2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge.Teachers College Record108(6)1017–1054.
    [Google Scholar]
36. NormanD..(2013) The design of everyday thingsNew YorkBasic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
37. NystrandM..(1986) The structure of written communicationOrlando, FLAcademic.
    [Google Scholar]
38. NystrandM.BrandtD..(1989) Response to writing as a context for learning to writeAnsonC. M..(Ed.)Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research209–230Urbana, ILNational Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
39. PriorP. A..(1998) Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academyMahwah, NJErlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
40. SelberS..(2004) Multiliteracies for a digital ageCarbondaleSouthern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. SelfeC. L.SelfeR. J..(1994) The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones.College Composition and Communication45480–504.
    [Google Scholar]
42. SmithA.MccartheyS.MagnificoA..(2017) Recursive feedback: Evaluative dimensions of e-learningCopeB.KalantzisM..(Eds.)e-Learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment118–142New YorkRoutledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. SnartJ..(2015) Hybrid and fully online OWIHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction93–127Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
44. SpigelmanC..(1998) Habits of the mind: Historical configurations of textual ownership in peer writing groups.College Composition and Communication49234–255.
    [Google Scholar]
45. WarnockS..(2015) Teaching the OWI courseHewettB. L.DepewK. E..(Eds.)Foundational practices of online writing instruction151–181Retrieved fromhttps://wac.colostate.edu/books/perspectives/owi/
    [Google Scholar]
46. WertschJ. V..(1998) Mind as actionNew YorkOxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. WoodardR.MagnificoA. M.Mc-CartheyS..(2013) Supporting teacher metacognition about formative assessment in online writing environments.E-Learning and Digital Media10442–469.
    [Google Scholar]