Skip to content
2018
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930240
2019-08-01
2023-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Applebee A. N.. (1974)  Tradition and reform in the teaching of English: A history, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Applebee A. N.. (1990)  Book-length works taught in high school English courses, (ERIC Document No. ED318035). Retrieved fromhttps://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9214/book.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Applebee A. N.. (1992)  Stability and change in the high-school canon. English Journal, 81(5), 27–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Applebee A. N.. (1993)  Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Applebee A. N. Langer J. A.. (2011)  A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Applebee A. N. Langer J. A. Nystrand M. Gamoran A.. (2003)  Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685–730.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Au W.. (2010)  The idiocy of policy: The anti-democratic curriculum of high-stakes testing. Critical Education, 1(1) Retrieved fromhttp://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/182239
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Au W.. (2011)  Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 25–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Beadie N.. (1999)  From student markets to credential markets: The creation of the Regents examination system in New York State, 1864-1890. History of Education Quarterly, 39, 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennett R. E. Ward W. C. (Eds.) (2012)  Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berliner D. C.. (2009)  MCLB (much curriculum left behind): A U.S. calamity in the making. Educational Forum, 73(4), 284–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bertaux N. Washington M.. (2005)  The “colored schools” of Cincinnati and African American community in nineteenth-century Cincinnati, 1849-1890. The Journal of Negro Education, 74, 43–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bishop R. S.. (1990)  Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6(3), ix–xi.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bleich D.. (1975)  Readings and feelings: An introduction to subjective criticism, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED103832
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bloom B. S. Hastings J. Madaus G. F.. (1971)  Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brody P. DeMilo C. Purves A. C.. (1989)  The current state of assessment in literature, (Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature Report Series 3.1). Retrieved fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315763
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooks C.. (1947)  The well wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry, Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Burris C. Murphy J.. (2014)  A disturbing look at Common Core tests in New York. The Washington Post, Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/06/27/a-disturbing-look-at-common-core-tests-in-new-york/
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Crocco M. S. Costigan A. T.. (2007)  The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42, 512–535.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cross N.. (1943)  Teaching English in wartime, Retrieved fromhttps://archives.library.illinois.edu/ncte/about/march.php
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellmann M.. (1968)  Thinking about women, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans L. Davies K.. (2000)  No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex Roles, 42, 255–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Executive Committee of the New York State Association of Teachers of English. (1912)  An open letter to teachers of English Pamphlets in philology and the humanities, 22 New York State Association of Teachers of English. Retrieved fromhttps://books.google.com
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Faust M. Dressman M.. (2009)  The other tradition: Populist perspectives on teaching poetry, as published in “English Journal,” 1912–2005. English Education, 41, 114–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Folts J. D.. (1996)  History of the University of the State of New York and the State Education Department 1784–1996, Retrieved from New York State Education Department websitehttp://www.nysl.nysed.gov/edocs/education/sedhist.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Garcia A.. (2013)  Critical foundations in young adult literature: Challenging genres, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gates H. L.. (1988)  The signifying monkey: A theory of African-American literary criticism, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Genovese J. E. C.. (2002)  Cognitive skills valued by educators: Historical content analysis of testing in Ohio. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 101–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Giouroukakis V. Honigsfeld A.. (2010)  High-stakes testing and English language learners: Using culturally and linguistically responsive literacy practices in the high school English classroom. TESOL Journal, 1, 470–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gorlewski J. A. Gorlewski D. A.. (2013)  De-grading literacy: How New York State tests knowledge, culture, and critical thinking. Counterpoints, 451, 63–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Graff G.. (2008)  Professing literature: An institutional history, (20th anniversary ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hill S. Briggs L. Hurlbut B.. (1896)  Twenty years of school and college English, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hillocks G.. (2002)  The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hillocks G. Ludlow L. H.. (1984)  A taxonomy of skills in reading and interpreting fiction. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 7–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hirsch E. D.. (1988)  Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know, New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Holyoak K. J.. (1982)  An analogical framework for literary interpretation. Poetics, 11, 105–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hook J. N.. (1979)  A long way together: A personal view of NCTE’s first sixty-seven years, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hughes L.. (1926)  The Negro artist and the racial mountain. The Nation, Retrieved fromhttp://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/g_l/hughes/mountain.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hursh D.. (2013)  Raising the stakes: Highstakes testing and the attack on public education in New York. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 574–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnson C. S.. (2009)  History of New York State Regents exams, Retrieved fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507649
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kane-Mainier S.. (2015)  How the genre and work of poetry are represented by tenth grade literature anthologies, (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of Pittsburgh websitehttp://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/25865/
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kang R. L.. (2015)  Assessment matters: Negotiating the New York State English Regents exam, (Doctoral dissertation) Columbia University New York
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Marshall J. D.. (2000)  Research on response to literature. Kamil M. L. Pearson P. D. Barr R. Mosenthal P. B.. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 3 New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mihalakis V.. (2010)  September 20. An analysis of the conceptual coherence and opportunities for interpretation in tenth grade literature textbooks, (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromhttp://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/8437/
    [Google Scholar]
  45. National Center for Education Statistics. (1993)  120 years of American education: A statistical portrait, Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  46. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010)  Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Washington, DC: Authors.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. New York State Education Department. (2017)  NY State public school enrollment (2016–17), Retrieved August 30 2018, fromhttps://data.nysed.gov/enrollment.php?year=2017&state=yes
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Office of State Assessment. (1987)  High school general information, Retrieved from New York State Education Department websitehttp://www.p12.nysed.gov/assessment/hsgen/home.html
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Polleck J. N. Jeffery J. V.. (2017)  Common Core standards and their impact on standardized test design: A New York case study. High School Journal, 101, 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Probst R. E.. (1986)  Three relationships in the teaching of literature. English Journal, 75(1), 60–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ransom J. C.. (1941)  The new criticism, New York: New Directions.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Riede P.. (2013)  New York’s private and parochial schools struggled on new state tests, just like the public schools, Retrieved fromhttp://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2013/09/new_yorks_private_and_parochial_schools_also_struggled_on_state_tests.html
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosenblatt L.. (1978)  The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Said E.. (1983)  The world, the text, and the critic, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Santman D.. (2002)  Teaching to the test? Test preparation in the reading workshop. Language Arts, 79, 203–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sewell W. C.. (2008)  Entrenched pedagogy: A history of stasis in the English language arts curriculum in United States secondary schools. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 15, 87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Smagorinsky P. Whiting M. E.. (1995)  How English teachers get taught: Methods of teaching the methods course, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Smith D. V.. (1939)  Implications of the New York Regents’ inquiry for the teaching of English. English Journal, 28(3), 177–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Smolkin L. B. Young C. A.. (2011)  Missing mirrors, missing windows: Children’s literature textbooks and LGBT topics. Language Arts, 88, 217–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Stallworth B. J. Gibbons L. Fauber L.. (2006)  It’s not on the list: An exploration of teachers’ perspectives on using multicultural literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 478–489.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Stotsky S.. (1991)  April Does a literary canon exist in our secondary schools?, Paper presented at the American Education Research Association 1991 Spring Conference Chicago Retrieved fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED331057
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Stotsky S. Traffas J. Woodworth J.. (2010)  Forum: A publication of the association of literary scholars, critics, and writers: No. 4. Literary study in grades 9, 10, and 11: A national survey, Retrieved fromhttp://alscw.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/forum_4.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Stotsky S. Goering C. Jolliffe D.. (2010)  Literary study in grades 9, 10, and 11 in Arkansas, Retrieved from University of Arkansas websitehttps://cied.uark.edu/-resources/pdf/literary-study-czg.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Tanner G. W.. (1907)  Report of the committee appointed by the English conference to inquire into the teaching of English in the high schools of the Middle West. The School Review, 15(1), 32–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Taylor K.. (2015)  English class in Common Core era: ‘Tom Sawyer’ and court opinions. The New York Times, Retrieved fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/20/nyregion/english-class-in-common-core-era-non fiction-joins-the-classics.html
    [Google Scholar]
  66. University of the State of New York. (1890)  Annual report of the Regents of the University, to the legislature of the State of New York, Albany: Author.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Willinsky J.. (1991)  The triumph of literature/the fate of literacy: Teaching English in the high school, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Woodson C. G.. (2016)  The mis-education of the Negro, Ocean Shores, WA: Watchmaker. (Original work published 1933).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930240
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930240
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error