Nerdisms, Almina, and the Petsitter: Becoming Social Commentary Composers

References

1. Ahmed S.. (2010)  Happy objects. Gregg M. Seigworth G. J.. (Eds.), The affect theory reader, 29–51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aukerman M.. (2013)  Rereading comprehension pedagogies: Toward a dialogic teaching ethic that honors student sensemaking. Dialogic Pedagogy, 1, 1–31.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barad K.. (2007)  Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braidotti R.. (2013)  The posthuman, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braun B.. (2005)  Environmental issues: Writing a more-than-human urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 635–650.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bennett J.. (2001)  The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bennett J.. (2010)  Vibrant matter: A politiscal economy of things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burnett C. Merchant G.. (2016)  Boxes of poison: Baroque technique as antidote to simple views of literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 258–279.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Campbell J.. (n.d.) Ep. 1: Joseph Campbell and the power of the myth – “The hero’s adventure.” https://billmoyers.com/content/ep-1-joseph-campbell-and-the-power-of-myth-the-hero%E2%80%99s-adventure-audio/ Retrieved from (Original work broadcast June 21 1988).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cavna M.. (2012)  June 25 PIXAR TIPS: ‘Brave’ artist Emma Coats shares her story telling wit and wisdom on Twitter. The Washington Post, Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/pixar-tips-brave-artist-emma-coats-shares-her-storytelling-wit-and-wisdom-on-twitter-followher/2012/06/25/gJQADaxd2V_blog.html?utm_term=.aa4bc8c140f6
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chisholm J. S. Whitmore K. F. Shelton A. L. Mcgrath I. V.. (2016)  Moving interpretations: Using drama-based arts strategies to deepen learning about The Diary of a Young Girl. English Journal, 105(5), 35–41.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coffin P. Balda K. (produCers) Lynch B. (Writer) Melendandri C. Healy J. (produCers). (2015)  Minions [Motion picture], United States of America: Illumination Entertainment for Universal Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Davies B. Gannon S. (eds.) (2009)  Pedagogical encounters, New York: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Delanda M.. (2006)  A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity, New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Deleuze G. Guattari F.. (2004)  A thou sand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia Massumi B.. Trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dolphijn R. Van Der Tuin I.. (2012)  New materialism: Interviews & cartographies, Retrieved fromhttps://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001/1:4.3/--new-materialism-interviews-cartographies?rgn=div2;view=toc
    [Google Scholar]
17. Edmiston B.. (2000)  Drama as ethical education. Research in Drama Education, 5(1), 63–84.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Edmiston B.. (2014)  Transforming teaching and learning with active and dramatic approaches, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ehret C. Hollett T.. (2014)  Embodied composition in real virtualities: Adolescents’ literacy practices and felt experiences moving with digital, mobile devices in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 428–452.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fenwick T. Edwards R.. (2012)  Research ing education through actor-network-theory, Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Freire P.. (1972)  Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gregg M. Seigworth G. J. (eds.) (2010)  The affect theory reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hickey-Moody A. Malins P.. (2007)  Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hinchcliffe S. Whatmore S.. (2006)  Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15(2), 123–138.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hultman K. Lenz Taguchi H.. (2010)  Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist method ological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jackson A. Y. Mazzei L. A.. (2012)  Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kuby C. R.. (2017)  Why a paradigm shift of “more than human ontologies” is needed: Putting to work poststructural and post human theories in writers’ studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Educa tion, 30, 877–896.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kuby C. R. Gutshall Rucker T.. (2016)  Go be a writer! Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kuby C. Spector K. Thiel J. J.. (2019)  Posthumanism and literacy education: Knowing/becoming/doing literacies, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Latour B.. (2004)  Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Latour B.. (2005)  Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Leander K. Boldt G.. (2013)  Rereading “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 22–46.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lenters K.. (2016)  Riding the lines and overwriting in the margins: Affect and multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 280–316.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lenters K. Smith C.. (2018)  Assembling improv and collaborative story building in language arts class. Reading Teacher, 72, 179–189.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lenters K. Whitford A.. (2018)  Failing with grace: Kids, improv, and embodied literacies. Literacy, 52, 117–127.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lenz Taguchii H.. (2010)  Going beyond the theory-practice divide in early childhood education. Introducing an intra-active pedagogy, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Maclure M.. (2013)  Classification or won der? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. Coleman R. Ringrose J.. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies, 164–183. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Masny D.. (2012)  Cartographies of multiple literacies. Masny D. Cole M.. (Eds.), Mapping multiple literacies: An introduction to Deleuzian literacy studies, 15–39. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Massumi B.. (2015)  Politics of affect, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Mazzei L. A. Mccoy K.. (2010)  Think ing with Deleuze in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 503–509.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nerd. (n.d.). Oxford English diction ary online, Retrieved fromhttps://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/nerd
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nerdinator. (2003)  November 1 Nerd. Urban Dictionary, Retrieved fromhttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nerd
    [Google Scholar]
43. Nichols P. Campano G.. (2017)  Post humanism and literacy studies. Language Arts, 94, 245–251.
    [Google Scholar]
44. O’Neill C.. (1995)  Drama worlds: A frame work for process drama, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Perry M. Medina C.. (2011)  Embodiment and performance in pedagogy research: Investigating the possibility of the body in curriculum experience. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27(3), 62–75.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Slazak B. D.. (2013)  May Improv(ing) students: Teaching improvisation to high school students to increase creative and critical thinking (Unpublished master’s thesis, State University of New York), Retrieved fromhttps://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.ca/&httpsredir=1&article=1301&context=gradconf
    [Google Scholar]
47. Smith K. Mcknight K. S.. (2009)  Remembering to laugh and explore: Improvisational activities for literacy teaching in urban class rooms. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(12) Retrieved fromhttp://www.ijea.org/v10n12/
    [Google Scholar]
48. Spolin V.. (1999)  Improvisation for the theater, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. St. Pierre E. A.. (2016)  Rethinking the empirical in the posthuman. Taylor C. A. Hughes C.. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education, 25–36. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Stewart K.. (2010)  Afterword: Worlding refrains. Gregg M. Seigworth G.J.. (Eds.), The affect theory reader, 339 Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Taylor C. A.. (2016)  Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology. Taylor C. A. Hughes C.. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education, 5–24. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hiel J. J.. (2015)  “Bumblebee’s in trouble!” Embodied literacies during imaginative super hero play. Language Arts, 93, 38–49.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Unicorn Black. (n.d.). Jiya/Burka Avenger, Retrieved fromhttp://www.burkaavenger.com
    [Google Scholar]