The Power of Personal Connection for Undergraduate Student Writers

References

1. Addison J. Mcgee S. J.. (2010)  Writing in high school/writing in college: Research trends and future directions. College Compo sition and Communication, 62, 147–179.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson P. Anson C. M. Gonyea R. M. Paine C.. (2015)  The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50, 199–235.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anson C. M.. (2010)  The intradisciplinary influence of composition on writing across the curriculum, 1967–1986. WAC Journal, 21, 5–20.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anson C. M. Lyles K.. (2011)  The intradisciplinary influence of composition on writing across the curriculum, part two: 1986–2006. WAC Journal, 22, 7–19.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ball A. F.. (1992)  Cultural preference and the expository writing of African-American adolescents. Written Communication, 9, 501–532.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beaufort A.. (2007)  College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction, Logan: Utah State University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Behizadeh N.. (2014)  Adolescent perspectives on authentic writing instruction. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(1), 27–44.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burstein J. Elliot N. Molloy H.. (2016)  Informing automated writing evaluation using the lens of genre: Two studies. Calico Journal, 33(1), 117–141.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carroll L. A.. (2002)  Rehearsing new roles: How college students develop as writers, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Engle R. A. Lam D. P. Meyer X. S. Nix S. E.. (2012)  How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explana tions and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47, 215–231.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eodice M. Geller A. E. Lerner N.. (2016)  The meaningful writing project: Learning, teaching, and writing in higher education, Logan: Utah State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Esteban-Guitart M. Moll L. C.. (2013)  Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20, 31–48.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gere A. R.. (2018)  The way our students write now. PMLA, 133, 139–145.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Glaser B. G. Strauss A. L.. (1967)  The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
15. González N. Moll L. C. Amanti C. (eds.) (2006)  Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Graves R. Hyland T. Samuels B. M.. (2010)  Undergraduate writing assignments: An analysis of syllabi at one Canadian college. Written Communication, 27, 293–317.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Guerra J. C.. (2008)  Cultivating transcultural citizenship: A writing across communities model. Language Arts, 85, 296–304.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guerra J. C.. (2016)  Language, culture, identity and citizenship in college classrooms and communities, New York: Routledge. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haswell R. H.. (1991)  Gaining ground in college writing: Tales of development and in terpretation, Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Herrington A. Curtis M.. (2000)  Persons in process: Four stories of writing and personal development in college, Urbana, IL: NCTE.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hilgers T. L. Hussey E. L. Stitt-Bergh M.. (1999)  “As you’re writing, you have these epiphanies”: What college students say about writing and learning in their majors. Written Communication, 16, 317–353.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jackson D. B.. (2003)  Education reform as if student agency mattered: Academic micro cultures and student identity. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 579–585.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jarratt S. C. Mack K. Sartor A. Watson S. E.. (2009)  Pedagogical memory: Writing, mapping, translating. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 33(1–2), 46–73.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kells M. H.. (2007)  Writing across com munities: Deliberation and the discursive possibilities of WAC. Reflections, 6, 87–108.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kells M. H.. (2018)  Writing across com munities. Liontas J. I. Dellicarpini M.. (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 4438–4445. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lett J.. (1990)  Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology. Head Land T. N. Pike K. L. Harris M.. (Eds.), Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate, 127–142. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lillis T.. (2001)  Student writing: Access, regulation, desire, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Melzer D.. (2014)  Assignments across the curriculum: A national study of college writing, Logan: Utah State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Moje E. B. Mcintosh Ciechanowski K. Kramer K. Ellis L. Carrillo R. Col Lazo T.. (2004)  Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–71.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Moje E. B. Youn J. P. Readence J. E. Moore D. W.. (2000)  Re/Mediating adoles cent literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 400–410.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Moss B. J.. (1994)  Literacy across communi ties, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Muhammad G. E. Behizadeh N.. (2015)  Authentic for whom? An interview study of desired writing practices for African American adolescent learners. Middle Grades Review, 1(2), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pisarik C. Whelchel T.. (2018)  Academic relevance: College students’ perspective. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30, 26–35.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Poe M.. (2013)  Re-framing race in teaching writing across the curriculum. Across the Disciplines, 10(3) Retrieved fromhttp://wac.colostate.edu/atd/race/poe.cfm
    [Google Scholar]
35. Richardson E.. (2002)  African American literacies, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Royster J. J.. (1996)  When the first voice you hear is not your own. College Composition and Communication, 47, 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Russell D.. (2002)  Writing in the academic disciplines: A curricular history, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Saldaña J.. (2012)  The coding manual for qualitative researchers(2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Smagorinsky P.. (2008)  The methods section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sternglass M. S.. (1997)  Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thaiss C. Zawacki T.. (2006)  Engaged writers and dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life, Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tuitt F. A.. (2003)  Afterword: Realizing a more inclusive pedagogy. Howell A. Tuitt F.. (Eds.), Race and higher education: Re thinking pedagogy in diverse college classrooms, 243–268. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Williams B. T.. (2017)  Literacy practices and perceptions of agency: Composing identities, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]