f In Dialogue: Methodological Pluralism

References

1. Love B. L. (2019)  We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom, Boston: Beacon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Sojoyner D. M. (2016)  First strike: Educational enclosures in black Los Angeles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Tuck E. Yang K. W. (2014)  Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 811–818.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Wynter S. (2003)  Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. New Centennial Review, 3 (3), 257–337.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Mccann T. M. (1989)  Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23 62–76.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Smagorinsky P.. (2008)  The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389–411 Retrieved from, http://www.petersmagorinsky.net/About/PDF/WC/WC2008.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
7. Toulmin S. (1958)  The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Weyland L. Goff B. Newell G. (2018)  The social construction of warranting evidence in two classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 50, 97–122.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barad K. (2010)  Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3, 240–268.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Barad K. (2012)  On touching – the inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23 (3), 206–223.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Campt T. M. (2017)  Listening to images. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crary J. (1990)  Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Derrida J. (1994)  Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gordon A. F. .(1997)  Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halpern O. (2014)  Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Massumi B. (2002)  Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sharpe C. (2016)  In the wake: On Blackness and being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wynter S. (2001)  Towards the sociogenic principle: Fanon, identity, the puzzle of conscious experience, and what it is like to be Black. Gomez-Moriana A. Duran-Cogan M.. (Eds.), National identities and sociopolitical changes in Latin America, 30–66. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]