Skip to content
2018
Volume 53, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348
side by side viewer icon HTML
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930036
2019-02-01
2024-03-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/rte/53/3/researchintheteachingofenglish30036.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930036&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson L. W. Krathwohl D. R. Bloom B. S. (2001)  A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Athanases S. Z. de Oliveira L. C. (2014)  Scaffolding versus routine support for Latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 263–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aukerman M. (2008)  In praise of wiggle room: Locating comprehension in unlikely places. Language Arts, 86, 52–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin M. M. (1981)  The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd M. P. (2012)  Planning and realigning lesson in response to student contributions: Intentions and decision making. Elementary School Journal, 113, 25–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruner J. S. (1966)  Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunch G. C. Abram P. L. Lotan R. A. Valdes G. (2001)  Beyond sheltered instruction: Rethinking conditions for academic language development. TESOL Journal, 10, 28–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunch G. C. Kibler A. Pimentel S. Walqui A. (2013)  Realizing opportunities for English learners in the Common Core English language arts and disciplinary literacy standards, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bunch G. C. Walqui A. Pearson P. D. (2014)  Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 533–559.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chinn C. A. (2006)  The microgenetic method: Current work and extensions to classroom research. Green J. L. Camilli G. Elmore P. B.. (Eds.) Handbook of complementary methods in education research, 439–456. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Collier V. P. (1987)  Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Colombi M. C. Schleppegrell M. J.. (2002)  Theory and practice in the development of advanced literacy. Colombi M. C. Schleppegrell M. J.. (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power, 1–19. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cummins J. (1984)  Multilingual Matters: Vol. 6. Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Daniel S. M. JiméNez R. T. Pray L. Pacheco M. B..(2017)  Scaffolding to make translanguaging a classroom norm. TESOL Journal, Advance online publication, Retrieved from, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19493533
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Daniel S. M. Martin-BeltrÁN M. Peercy M. M. Silverman R. (2015)  Moving beyond yes or no: Shifting from over-scaffolding to contingent scaffolding in literacy instruction with emergent bilingual students. TESOL Journal, 7, 393–420.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. de Oliveira L. C. Athanases S. Z.. (2017)  A framework to reenvision instructional scaffolding for linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61, 123–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. de Oliveira L. C. Gilmetdinova A. Pelaez-Morales C. (2016)  The use of Spanish by a monolingual kindergarten teacher to support English language learners. Language and Education, 30, 22–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Escamilla K. (2014)  Biliteracy from the start: Literacy squared in action. Philadelphia: Caslon.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fillmore L. W. Fillmore C. J. (2012)  What does text complexity mean for English learners and language minority students?, Retrieved from, https://ell.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/academic-papers/06-LWF%20CJF%20Text%20Complexity%20FINAL_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GarcíA O. Kleifgen J. A. (2018)  Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GarcíA O. Wei L. (2014)  Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Genesee F. Lindholm-Leary K. Saunders B. Christian D. (2006)  Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibbons P. (2009)  English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbons P. (2014)  Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldenberg C. Haertel E. Coleman R. Reese L. Rodriguez-Mojica C. (2013)  Classroom qualities for English language learners in language arts instruction: Technical report, Retrieved from, https://people.stanford.edu/claudeg/cqell
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Harklau L. (2002)  The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hiebert J. Grouws D. A.. (2007)  The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Lester F. K.. (Ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 371–404. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hymes D. (1974)  Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jimenez R. T. David S. Fagan K. Risko V. J. Pacheco M. Pray L. Gonzales M. (2015)  Using translation to drive conceptual development for students becoming literate in English as an additional language. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 248–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson E. M. (2018)  Exemplary reading teachers’ use of instructional scaffolds with emergent bilinguals: How knowledge and context shape their choices. TESOL Quarterly, Advance online publication, Retrieved from, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15457249
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kibler A. (2011)  Casi nomás me dicen qué escribir/They almost just tell me what to write: A longitudinal analysis of teacherstudent interactions in a linguistically diverse mainstream secondary classroom. Journal of Education, 191 (1), 45–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kleinfeld J. (1975)  Effective teachers of Eskimo and Indian students. School Review, 83, 301–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Krashen S. (1982)  Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lantolf J. P. Thorne S. L.. (2006)  Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development, Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lave J. Wenger E. (1991)  Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Levitt S. D. Dubner S. J.. (2010)  Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. New York: Morrow.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Loeb S. Soland J. Fox L. (2014)  Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 457–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mariani L. (1997)  Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives: A Journal of TESOL Italy, 23 (2), Retrieved from, http://www.learningpaths.org/papers/papersupport.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Matsumura L. C. Slater S. C. Junker B. Peterson M. Boston M. Steele M. Resnick L. (2006)  Measuring reading comprehension and mathematics instruction in urban middle schools: A pilot study of the Instructional Quality Assessment, Retrieved from, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492885.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Menken K. (2013)  Restrictive language education policies and emergent bilingual youth: A perfect storm with imperfect outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 52, 160–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mertzman T. (2008)  Individualising scaffolding: Teachers’ literacy interruptions of ethnic minority students and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 183–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Palmer D. K. MartÍNez R. A. Mateus S. G. Henderson K. (2014)  Reframing the debate on language separation: Toward a vision for translanguaging pedagogies in the dual language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 98, 757–772.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reynolds D.. (2017)  Interactional scaffolding for comprehension. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Reynolds D. Daniel S. (2018)  Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 367–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Saunders W. M. Goldenberg C. Marcel-Letti D.. (2013)  English language development: Guidelines for instruction. American Educator, 37 (2), 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schleppegrell M. J. (2004)  The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Short D. J. Fitzsimmons S. (2007)  Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Silliman E. R. Wilkinson L. C.. (1994)  Discourse scaffolds for classroom intervention. Wallach G. Butler K.. (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents, 27–54. Princeton, NC: Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Soter A. O. Wilkinson I. A. Murphy P. K. Rudge L. Reninger K. Edwards M. (2008)  What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 372–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Thomas W. P. Collier V. (1997)  School effectiveness for language minority students, Retrieved from, https://ncela.ed.gov/files/rcd/BE020890/School_effectiveness_for_ langu.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  51. van de Pol J. Volman M. Beishuizen J. (2010)  Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. van Lier L. (2004)  The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Verplaetse L. S. Migliacci N. (2008)  Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners: A handbook of research-informed practices, Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vygotsky L.. (1978)  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Walqui A. (2006)  Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 159–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wegerif R. Mercer N.. (1997)  Using computer-based text analysis to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in research on collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11, 271–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wood D. Bruner J. S. Ross G. (1976)  The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (2), 89–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Word Generation (2012)  Where are the women in math and science?, Retrieved from, https://wordgen.serpmedia.org/s_weekly 2014.html
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Yin R. K. (2014)  Case study research: Design and methods(5th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930036
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/rte201930036
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error