Counter-Storytelling vs. Deficit Thinking around African American Children and Families, Digital Literacies, Race, and the Digital Divide

References

1. Agyeman G. S. (2008)  White researcher— Black subjects? Exploring the challenges of researching the marginalised and invisible. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 77–84.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ba H. Tally W. Tsikalas K. (2002)  Investigating children’s emerging digital literacies. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 1 (4), Retrieved from, https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1670
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ball A. (1999)  Evaluating the writing of culturally and linguistically diverse students: The case of the African American vernacular English speaker. Cooper C. Odell L. . (Eds.) Evaluating writing, 225–248. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Banks A. J. (2006)  Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Banks-Wallace J. (2002)  Talk that talk: Storytelling and analysis rooted in African American oral tradition. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 410–426.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bell D. (1996)  White women can’t speak?. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 197–203.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bell L. A. (2010)  Storytelling for social justice: Connecting narrative and the arts in antiracist teaching. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caldas B. (2017)  Graduate school as a site of remembrance: Educación for resistance for bilingual teachers. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 11 (1), 73–90.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chaudron S. (2015)  Young children (0-8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries, Retrieved from, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239
   [Google Scholar]
10. Coles-Ritchie M. Smith R. R. (2017)  Taking the risk to engage in race talk: Professional development in elementary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21 (2), 172–186.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Decuir J.T. Dixson A. D. (2004)  So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33 (5), 26–31.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Delgado R. (1989)  Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411–2441.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Delgado R. Stefancic J. (2001)  Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Deshmukh-Towery I. Oliveri R. Gidney C. L.. (2007)  Peer-led professional development for equity and diversity: A report for teachers and administrators based on findings from the SEED Project (Seeking Educational Equity and Diversity). Cambridge, MA: Schott Foundation for Public Education.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dyson A. H. (2003)  The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eisenberg M. Lowe C. Spitzer K. (2004)  Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fine M. (2016)  Just methods in revolting times. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13 (4), 347–365.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Florio-Ruane S. (2001)  Teacher education and the cultural imagination: Autobiography, conversation, and narrative. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fordham S. (1993)  “Those loud Black girls”: (Black) women, silence, and gender “passing” in the academy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24, 3–32.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Glaser B. Strauss A. (1967)  Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Greene S. (2013)  Race, community and urban schools: Partnering with African American families. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Guba E.G. Lincoln Y. S. (2001)  Guidelines and checklist for constructivist (a.k.a. fourth generation) evaluation, Retrieved from, https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/constructivisteval.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hall T. (2011)  Designing from their own social worlds: The digital story of three African American youth women. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10 (1), 7–20.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hawisher G. Selfe C. Moraski B. Pearson M. (2004)  Becoming literate in the information age: Cultural ecologies and the literacies of technology. College Composition and Communication, 55, 642–692.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heath S. B. (1983)  Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. International Telecommunication Union (2014)  The world in 2014: ICT facts and figures, Retrieved from, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2014-e.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kelly L. B. (2017)  Welcoming counterstory in the primary literacy classroom. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 6 (1), 38–52.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kinloch V. Burkhard T. Penn C. (2017)  When school is not enough: Understanding the lives and literacies of Black youth. Research in the Teaching of English, 52, 34–54.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kucirkova N. Littleton K. Kyparissiadis A. (2018)  The influence of children’s gender and age on children’s use of digital media at home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 545–559.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Labbo L. (1996)  A semiotic analysis of young children’s symbol-making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356–385.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Labbo L. (2004)  Author’s computer chair. Reading Teacher, 57, 688–691.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lathan C. (2014)  Dear White teacher. Rethinking Schools, 29 (1), Retrieved from, https://www.rethinkingschools.org/articles/dear-white-teacher
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lewis T. Y. (2011)  Family digital literacies: A case of awareness, agency, and apprenticeship of one African American family. Dunston P. J. Gambrell L. B. Headley K. Fullerton S. K. Stecker P. M. Gillis V. R. Bates C. C.. (Eds.), 60th yearbook of the Literacy Research Association, 432–446. Oak Creek, WI: Literacy Research Association.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lewis T. Y. (2013)  “We txt 2 sty cnnectd”: An African American mother and son communicate: Digital literacies, meaning-making, and activity theory systems. Journal of Education, 193 (2), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lewis T. Y. (2014)  Apprenticeships, affinity spaces, and agency: Exploring blogging engagements in family spaces. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58, 71–81.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lewis Ellison T. 2014a An African American mother’s stories as T.M.I.: Ethics and vulnerability around traumatic narratives in digital literacy research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 255–274.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lewis Ellison T. 2014b Digital ontologies of self: Two African American adolescents co-construct and negotiate identities through The Sims 2. Digital Culture & Education, 6 (4), 317–340.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lewis Ellison T. (2016)  Artifacts as stories: Understanding families, digital literacies, and storied lives. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59, 511–513.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lewis Ellison T. 2017a Digital participation, agency, choice: An African American youth’s digital storytelling about Minecraft. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 61, 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lewis Ellison T. 2017b Family stories, texts, meaning: A study of artifacts during a digital storytelling workshop. Burnett C. Merchant G. Parry B.. (Eds.), Literacy, media and technology: Past, present and future, 79–92. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lewis Ellison T. 2017c The matter in parents’ stories: African American urban mothers’ counter stories about the Common Core State Standards and quality teaching. Urban Education. Advance online publication Retrieved from, https://journals.sagepub.com/home/uex
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lewis Ellison T. (2018)  Integrating and humanizing knowledgeable agents of the digital and Black feminist thought in digital literacy research. Mills K. A. Stornaiuolo A. Smith A. Pandya J. Z.. (Eds.) Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures, 88–98. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lewis Ellison T. Kirkland D. (2014)  Motherboards, mics, and metaphors: Reexamining new literacies and Black feminist thought through technologies of self. Journal of E-Learning and Digital Media, 11, 390–405.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lewis Ellison T. Nogueron-Liu S. Solomon M. (2016)  Co-constructing place, space, and race: African American and Latinx parents and researchers’ representations of digital literacy research in the South. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 17 (3), 61–98.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lewis Ellison T. Solomon M. (2018)  Digital play as purposeful and productive literacies among African American males. The Reading Teacher, 71, 495–500.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lewis Ellison T. Toliver S. R. (2018)  (CHAT)ting at home: A family’s activity theory system. Voices from the Middle, 25 (3), 37–42.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lewis Ellison T. Wang H. (2018)  Resisting and redirecting: Agentive practices within an African American parent-child dyad during digital storytelling. Journal of Literacy Research, 50, 53–74.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lincoln Y. Guba E. (1985)  Naturalistic inquiry. New York: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Lipsitz G. (2006)  The possessive investment in Whiteness: How White people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Livingstone S. Helsper E. J. (2007)  Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671–696.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Martin E. Martin J. (1978)  The Black extended family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Marx K. (1995)  The poverty of philosophy. London: Prometheus Books.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Mcpake J. Plowman L. Stephen C. (2013)  Pre-school children creating and communicating with digital technologies in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 421–431.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Merriam S. B. (1998)  Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Miles M. B. Huberman A. M. (Eds.) (1994)  Qualitative data analysis(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Mills K. A. Godley A. (2018)  Race and racism in digital media: What can critical race theory contribute to research on technocultures?. Mills K. A. Stornaiuolo A. Smith A. Pandya J. Z.. (Eds.), Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures, 111–122. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Milner R. (2007)  Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36 (7), 388–400.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Milner H. R. Lomotey K. (Eds.) (2014)  Handbook of urban education. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Morris E. (2007)  “Ladies” or “loudies”? Perceptions and experiences of Black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 490–515.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Moss B. P. (1990)  How the African American storyteller impacts the Black family and society, Retrieved from, http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1990/4/90.04.05.x.html
    [Google Scholar]
61. Noble S. U. (2018)  Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Norris P. (2001)  Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. O’Hara M. (2011)  Young children’s ICT experiences in the home: Some parental perspectives. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9, 220–231.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Patel L. (2016)  Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Patel L. (2018)  March 21 The woke academy: A conversation with Leigh Patel. [Webinar]. The Association for the Study of Higher Education: Woke Research Methodologies Series
    [Google Scholar]
66. Patton M. Q. (1990)  Qualitative evaluation and research methods(2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rogers R. Brefeld R. (2015)  Parents appraise schools: A study of counter narratives. Linguistics and Education, 29, 46–58.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Rolon-Dow R. (2011)  Race(ing) stories: Digital storytelling as a tool for critical race scholarship. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14, 159–173.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Rosenthal R. (1966)  Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rowsell J. Morrell E. Alvermann D. E. (2017)  Confronting the digital divide: Debunking brave new world discourses. Reading Teacher, 71, 157–165.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Roy K. Burton L. (2007)  Mothering through recruitment: Kinscription of nonresident fathers and father figures in low-income families. Family Relations, 56, 24–39.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Russell D. E. H. (1996)  Between a rock and a hard place: The politics of White feminists conducting research on Black women in South Africa. Wilkinson S. Kitzinger C.. (Eds.), Representing the other: A feminism and psychology reader, 89–93. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Selfe C. (1999)  Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College Composition and Communication, 53, 411–436.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Sinclair B. (2004)  Technology and the African American experience: Needs and opportunities for study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Smith A. (2014)  African Americans and technology use: A demographic portrait, Retrieved from Pew Research Center website, http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/06/african- americans-and-technology-use/
    [Google Scholar]
76. Smith D. E. (2016)  Finding sanctuary in sisterhood: A middle school literacy group critically analyzes race, gender, and size (Doctoral dissertation), Retrieved from, https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3960
    [Google Scholar]
77. Solomon M. (2012)  “Why can’t you just say, ‘It’s cute’?” The role of audience in first graders’ digital storytelling. Talking Points, 24 (1), 14–22.
    [Google Scholar]
78. SolóRzano D. G. Yosso T. J. (2002)  Critical race methodology: Counter-story telling as an analytical framework for education. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23–44.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Stanovich K. E. (1986)  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Stornaiuolo A. Leblanc R. J.. (2016)  Scaling as a literacy activity: Mobility and educational inequality in an age of global connectivity. Research in the Teaching of English, 50, 263–287.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Strauss A. Corbin J. (1990)  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Tatum B. D. (2001)  Professional development: An important partner in antiracist teacher education. King S. H. Castenell L. A.. (Eds.) Racism and racial inequality: Implications for teacher education, 51–58. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Thomas E. E. (2015)  “We always talk about race”: Navigating race talk dilemmas in the teaching of literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 50, 154–175.
    [Google Scholar]
84. US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1995)  Falling through the net: A survey of the “have-nots” in rural and urban America, Retrieved from, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
    [Google Scholar]
85. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2016)  Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education, Retrieved from, http://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
86. Vasudevan L. (2006)  Making known differently: Engaging visual modalities as spaces to author new selves. E-Learning, 3 (2), 207–216.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Villenas S. (1996)  The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and co-optation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 711–731.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Yin R. K. (1989)  Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]