f Editors’ Introduction: Toward Methodological Pluralism: The Geopolitics of Knowing

References

1. Bhattacharya K. (2016)  The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 309–321.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Castro-GóMez S. (2007)  The missing chapter of empire: Postmodern re-organization of coloniality and post-Fordist capitalism. Cultural Studies, 21, 428–448.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cushman E. (2011)  The Cherokee syllabary: Writing the people’s perseverance. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dillard C. B. (2000)  The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 661–681.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Few A. L. Stephens D. P. Rouse-Arnett M. (2003)  Sister-to-sister talk: Transcending boundaries and challenges in qualitative research with Black women. Family Relations, 52, 205–215.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Freire P. (1970)  Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mignolo W. D. (2009)  Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26 (8), 159–181.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Mirra N. GarcíA A. Morrell E. (2015)  Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Paris D. Winn M. T. EDs (2014)  Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Smagorinsky P. (2008)  The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25, 389–411.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Smith L. T. (1999)  Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Taguchi H. L. St. Pierre E. A. (2017)  Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 643–648.
    [Google Scholar]