Skip to content
2018
  1. NCTE Publications Home
  2. All Journals
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Volume 53, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 53, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

Educators and researchers from a range of fields have devoted their careers to studying how reading develops and how to support students who find reading challenging. Some children struggle specifically with learning to decode print, the central issue in what is referred to as dyslexia.However, research has failed to identify unique characteristics or patterns that set apart students identified as dyslexic from other readers with decoding challenges. Nevertheless, an authoritative discourse that speaks of a definitive definition, a unique set of characteristics, and a specific form of intervention saturates policy and practice around dyslexia, and teacher educators are under increasing pressure to include this state-sanctioned information in their classes. Literacy educators’ experiences teaching reading in schools and preparing literacy professionals can add valuable perspectives to the conversation about dyslexia; however, currently their voices are largely silent in conversations around dyslexia research, policy, and practice. The current research was designed to address this gap through an intensive interview study, in which we employed a Disability Critical Race Studies framework, along with Bakhtin’s notions of authoritative and internally persuasive discourse to explore the perspectives, understandings, and experiences of literacy teacher educators regarding dyslexia.

© 2018 by the National Council of Teachers of English. Printed in the United States of America
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte201829864
2018-11-15
2023-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association Specific learning disorder. Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/.../DSMAPA_DSM-5-Specific-Learning-Disorder.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Annamma S. Connor D. Ferri B. (2013)  Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16, 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baglieri S. Valle J. W. Connor D. J. Gallagher D. J. (2011)  Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 267–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin M. M. (1981)  The dialogic imagination: Four essays Emerson C. Holquist M. . Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barquero N. Davis N. Cutting L. (2014)  Neuroimaging of reading intervention: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9 (1), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BéDARD M. Laplante L. Mercier J. (2016)  Development of reading remediation for dyslexic individuals: Added benefits of the joint consideration of neurophysiological and behavioral data. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 240–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop D. (2013)  Research review: Emanuel Miller memorial lecture 2012 - Neuroscientific studies of intervention for language impairment in children: Interpretive and methodological problems. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 54, 247–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassar M. Treiman R. Moats L. Pollo T. Kessler B. (2005)  How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare with those of nondyslexic children?. Reading and Writing, 18, 27–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Compton D. Miller A. Elleman A. Steacy L. (2014)  Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability?. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Connor D. (2014)  Chapter 7: Social justice in education for students with disabilities. Florian L. . The SAGE handbook of special education, 1, 111–128. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eklund A. Nichols T. Knutsson H. (2016)  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positiverates. Proceedings of the National Acacdemy of Sciences, 113, 7900–7905.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Elliott J. Grigorenko E. (2014)  The dys-lexia debate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis A. (2014)  Reading, writing, and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis 3rd New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis A. Macdougall S. Monk A. (1997)  Are dyslexics different? IV. In defence of uncertainty. Dyslexia, 3, 12–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Emerson R. Fretz R. I. Shaw L. L. (1995)  Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferri B. (2004)  Interrupting the discourse: A response to Reid and Valle. Journal of Learn-ing Disabilities, 6, 509–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fierros E. Conroy J. (2002)  Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. Losen D. Orfield G. . Racial inequity in special education, 39–70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Frankel K. Pearson P. Nair M. (2010)  Reading comprehension and reading disability. A. McGill-Franzen Allington R. . Handbook of reading disability research, 219–231. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibbs S. Elliott J. (2015)  The differential effects of labelling: How do “dyslexia” and “reading difficulties” affect teachers’ beliefs. European Journal of Special Needs, 30, 323–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gunderson L. Siegel L. (2001)  The evils of the use of IQ tests to define learning disabilities in first- and second-language learners. Reading Teacher, 55, 48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris T. Hodges R. (1981)  Dictionaryof reading and related terms. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hikida M. (2018)  Holding space for literate identity co-construction. Journal of Literacy Research, 50, 217–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoffman J. V. Duffy G. G. (2016)  Does thoughtfully adaptive teaching actually exist? A challenge to teacher educators. Theory Into Practice, 55, 172–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hruby G. Goswami U. (2011)  Neuroscience and reading: A review for reading education researchers. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 156–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hudson R. High L. Al OTAIBA S. (2007)  Dyslexia and the brain: What does current research tell us?. Reading Teacher, 60, 506–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hurford D. Hurford J. Head K. Keiper M. Nitcher S. Renner L. (2016)  The dyslexia dilemma: A history of ignorance, complacency, and resistance in colleges of education. Journal of Childhood and Developmental Disorders, 2 (3), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. International Dyslexia Association Dyslexia at a glance. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-at-a-glance/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. International Dyslexia Association (2015)  Effective reading instruction [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/effective-reading-instruction/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Larson M. Phillips D. (2005)  Becoming a teacher of literacy: The struggle between authoritative discourses. Teaching Education, 16, 311–323.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. List Of Colleges And Universities In Texas Wikipedia. Retrieved from
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lopes J. (2012)  Biologising reading problems: The specific case of dyslexia. Contemporary Social Science, 7, 215–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Macias L. Producer & Director (2013)  Embracing dyslexia [Motion picture]. New York: Janson Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Moats L. (2014)  What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: Addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 75–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mcdermott R. P. (1993)  The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. Chaiklin S. Lave J. . Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, 269–305. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Moats L. Lyon G. (1993)  Learning disabilities in the states: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Morson G. S. (2004)  The process of ideological becoming. Ball A. F. Freedman S. W. . Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning, 315–332. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Norton E. Wolf M. (2012)  Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Parsons S. Gallagher M. . George Masonuniversity Content Analysis Team. (2016)  A content analysis of nine literacy journals, 2009-2014. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 476–502.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramus F. Szenkovits G. (2008)  What phonological deficit?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reid D. Valle J. (2004)  The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Journal of Learning Disability, 37, 466–481.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Reutzel R. Mohr K. (2014)  50 years of Reading Research Quarterly (1965-2015): Looking back, moving forward. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 13–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richlan F. Kronbichler M. Wimmer H. (2009)  Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3299–3308.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ritchey K. Goeke J. (2006)  Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 40, 171–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rubin H. Rubin I. (2011)  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data 3rd Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scanlon D. Vellutino F. Small S. Fanuele J. (2005)  Severe reading difficulties—Can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13, 209–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Search All Bills: Filtering To Only Showbills Containing The Term “Dyslexia.” Retrieved from https://openstates.org/all/bills/?abbr=&search_text=dyslexia
  47. Shaywitz S. (2003)  Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shaywitz S. Escobar M. Shaywitz B. Fletcher J. Makuch R. (1992)  Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shaywitz S. Morris R. Shaywitz B. (2008)  The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shepard L. (1987)  The case for bias in tests of achievement and scholastic aptitude. Modgill S. Modgill C. . Arthur Jensen:Consensus and controversy, 210–226. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Simon R. Campano G. (2013)  Activist literacies: Teacher research as resistance to the “normal curve.”. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 9 (1), 21–39 Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Teacher-Research.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sleeter C. E. (1987)  Why is there learning disabilities? A critical analysis of the birth of the field in its social context. Popke-witz T. S. . The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution, 210–237. London: Palmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stanovich K. (1994)  Does dyslexia exist?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 579–595.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tanaka H. Black J. Hulme C. Stanley L. Kesler S. Whitfield-GABRIELI S. Hoeft F. (2011)  The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychological Science, 22, 1442–1451.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Texas Education Agency (2014)  The Texas dyslexia handbook- Revised 2014: Procedures concerning dyslexia and related disorders. Austin: Texas Education Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Toste J. (2016)  How does the magic happen? Preparing America’s teachers to meet the needs of students with dyslexia [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jessica-r-toste/teachers-meet-the-needs-of-students-with-dyslexia_b_9750238.html
    [Google Scholar]
  57. U.S. Department Of Education Subpart D—Evaluations, eligibility determinations,individualized education programs, and educational placements. Retrieved from https://sites
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Vaughn S. Linan-Thompson S. (2003)  What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities?. Journal of Special Education, 37, 140–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vaughn M. Parsons S. A. (2013)  Adaptive teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts, 91, 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Vellutino F. R. Fletcher J. M. Snowling M. J. Scanlon D. M. (2004)  Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Washburn E. K. Binks-CANTRELL E. S. Joshi R. M. (2014)  What do preservice teachers from the USA and the UK know about dyslexia?. Dyslexia, 20, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. What Works Clearinghouse (2010)  Studentswith learning disabilities [report]. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_ortongill_070110.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wonder-Mcdowell C. Reutzel D. R. Smith J. A. (2011)  Does instructional alignment matter?. Elementary School Journal, 112, 259–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Worthy J. Dejulio S. Svrcek N. Villar-EAL D. A. Derbyshire C. Leekeenan K. SalmeróN C. (2016)  Teachers’ perspectives, understandings, and experiences around dyslexia. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65, 436–453.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Worthy J. Villareal D. Godfrey V. Dejulio S. Stefanski A. Leitze A. Cooper J. (2017)  A critical analysis of dyslexia legislation in three states. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66, 406–421.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Youman M. Mather N. (2013)  Dyslexia laws in the US. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 133–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Youman M. Mather N. (2018)  Dyslexia laws in the US: A 2018 update. Perspectiveson Language and Literacy, 37–41. Retrieved from https://dyslexiaida.org/dyslexia-laws-in-theusa-an-update/.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/rte201829864
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error