Skip to content
2018
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0034-527X
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2348

Abstract

Given the existing literature on text summarization that documents what learners, particularly younger learners, cannot do, a study was designed to assess what fifth-grade students can do. Thirty students at two reading levels read an expository text, produced a summary, reflected on the summarizing process, and identified good and bad summaries for the text. Both successful and less successful readers were fairly adept at recognizing good summaries, but proficiency group differences emerged for production and reflection measures. Readers in both proficiency groups performed at below-ceiling levels on the production and reflection measures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte198515646
1985-05-01
2026-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/rte198515646
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test