f Tracing Discourse across a Century of Language Arts

References

1. AhmedS (2006) Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker-BellA (2020( Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ColeMAllenKDoerr-StevenCIsraelsonM JociusRMurphyTYoonSROrtmannLCramptonA StutelbergEBeachRMartin-KerrK-GPetersonDSchickAKelleyBLambertCPyscherTRobinsonLGambinoAShareJSulzerM (2022) Annotated bibliography of research in the teaching of English. Research in the Teaching of English, 56(3), AB2–AB47.
   [Google Scholar]
4. DutroECollinsK (2011) A journey through nine decades of NCTE-published research in elementary literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 46(2), 141–61.
   [Google Scholar]
5. FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GarcíaO (2009) Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
7. GoldstoneAUnderwoodT (2014) The quiet transformations of literary studies: What thirteen thousand scholars could tell us. New Literary History, 45(3), –84.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GreeneMD (2022) #EyebrowsOnFleek: Centering Black girls’ performative digital literacies in the urban secondary context. HinchmanKASheridan-ThomasHK.(Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 62–77). Guilford.
   [Google Scholar]
9. GulldiJ (2019) Parliament’s debates about infrastructure using dynamic topic models to synthesize historical change. Technology and Culture, 60(1), 1–33.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GuzzettiBAndersPLNeumanS (1999) Thirty years of JRB/JLR: A retrospective of reading/literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 31(1), 67–92.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HoytELongDTranTHughesK (2015) Variety’s transformations: Digitizing and analyzing the first thirty-five years of the canonical trade paper. Film History: An International Journal, 27(4), 76–105.
    [Google Scholar]
12. JockersML (2013) Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. LeeCD (1995) Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation. Journal of Black Psychology, 21(4), 357–81.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LoveBL (2019) We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon.
    [Google Scholar]
15. MuhammadGE. (2015) Searching for full vision: Writing representations of African American adolescent girls. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(3), 224–47.
    [Google Scholar]
16. MuhammadGE. (2018) A plea for identity and criticality: Reframing literacy learning standards through a four-layered model. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(2), 137–42.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MuhammadGE. (2020) Cultivating genius: An equity model for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MuhammadGE. (2022) Cultivating genius and joy in education through historically responsive literacy. Language Arts, 99(3), 195–204.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ScribnerSColeM (1981) The psychology of literacy. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sealey-RuizY (2021) Racial literacy: A policy research brief. National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
21. StormSRainey EC. (2022) Designing for criticality: Cultivating textual practice for a pluralistic society. English Leadership Quarterly, 45(2), 6–9.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tochelli-WardAL.BoydFB. (2022) Culturally compelling teaching’ multimodality’ and transmediation in an eighth-grade English class. HinchmanKASheridan-ThomasHK. (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 313–330). Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
23. ToliverSR (2021) Freedom Dreaming in a Broken World: The Black Radical Imagination in Black Girls’ Science Fiction Stories. Research in the Teaching of English, 56(1), 85–106.
    [Google Scholar]