Skip to content
2018
Volume 100, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0360-9170
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2402

Abstract

Middle school science students participate in academic discourse centered around relevant and current controversial topics. Students engage in critical thinking and develop active listening skills.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/la202232025
2022-09-01
2024-02-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Callard C. H., Foster E. S., Kruger J. S.2020) How tech can build teams when learning moves online, the right combination of tools can build collaboration. The Learning Professional, 41(4, 46–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Henderson B. J., MacPherson A., Osborne J., Wild A.2015) Beyond construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10, 1668–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. von Aufschnaiter C. Erduran S., Osborne J., Simon S.2008) Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1, 101–31.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/la202232025
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error