Skip to content
2018
Volume 99, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0360-9170
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2402

Abstract

Using narrative inquiry, this study examines teacher narratives about elementary literacy teaching in the context of school change and accountability discourses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/la202131518
2021-11-01
2024-11-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Apple M. (1996) Power, meaning and identity: Critical sociology of education in the United States. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(2, 125–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Apple M. (2012) Education and power. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin M. (1981) Discourse in the novel. InHolquist M.(Ed.) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. 259–422. University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Council of Chief State School Officers (2019) Third grade reading laws: Implementation and impact. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/CCSSO%20CEELO%20third%20grade%20reading.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham J. W. (2001) The National Reading Panel Report. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3, 326–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Early Literacy Implementation Law Iowa State Code § 276.68 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965: H. R. 2362, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.. Public Law 89-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough N. (2015) Language and power. (3rd ed.) Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Foucault M. (1978) The History of sexuality: An introduction. Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Freire P. ((1970/2000)) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Freire P., Macedo D. (1987) Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Bergin & Garvey.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gay G. (2018) Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. (3rd ed.) Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gee J. P. (2001) What is literacy?. InShannon P.(Ed.) Becoming political, too: New readings and writings on the politics of literacy education. 1–9. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gee J. P. (2014) An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. (4th ed.) Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Glesne C. (2011) Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. (4th ed.) Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldstein D. (2014) The teacher wars: A history of America’s most embattled profession. Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harste J., Burke C. (1977) A new hypothesis for reading teacher research: Both the teaching and learning of reading is theoretically based. InPearson P. D.(Ed.) Reading: Theory and Practice. 32–40. Mason Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffman J. V., Hikida M., Sailors M. (2020) Contesting science that silences: Amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S255–S266.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kearns L. (2013) The construction of “illiterate” and “literate” youth: The effects of high-stakes standardized literacy testing. Race, ethnicity, and education, 19(1, 121–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim J.-H. (2016) Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kress G. ((2001/2004)) From Saussure to critical sociolinguistics: The turn towards a social view of language. InWeatherell M., Taylor S., Yates S. J.(Eds.)Discourse theory and practice: A reader. 29–38. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumashiro K. K. (2001) “Posts” perspectives on antioppressive education in social studies, English, mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher, 30(3, 3–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ladson-Billings G. (1995) But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3, 159–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Love B. (2019) We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Luke A. (1995) Text and Discourse in Education: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21(1, 3–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maybin J. ((2001/2004)) Language, struggle and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings. InWeatherell M., Taylor S., Yates S. J.(Eds.)Discourse theory and practice: A reader. 64–71. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Merriam S. (2009) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Minor C. (2019) We got this: Equity, access, and the quest to be who our students need us to be. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Muhammad G. (2020) Cultivating genius: An equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US) (2000) Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 20 U.S.C. § 6319 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Paris D., Alim H. S. (2017) Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ravitch D. (2016) The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. (3rd ed.) Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Saldana J. (2015) Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Saldana J. (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. (3rd ed.) Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas P. (2020) How to end the reading war and serve the literacy needs of all students: A primer for parents, policy makers, and people who care. Information Age.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. United States National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the secretary of education, United States Department of Education. The Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/la202131518
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/la202131518
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error