Skip to content
2018
Volume 98, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0360-9170
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2402

Abstract

Predictive text and auto-correct are often seen as distractions, yet engaging writers with these writing assistance technologies can provide students with “micro moments” of instruction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/la202131332
2021-07-01
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker E. A. (2017) Apps, iPads, and literacy: Examining the feasibility of speech recognition in a first-grade classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 291–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker E. A. (2019) Talk to read and write: Using speech-recognition apps in a first-grade writing center. Language Arts, 96(6), 358.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baleja K., Zhang M. (2020) Digital reading strategies: How practices and applications compared to perceptions. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. 367–75. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Farjon D., Smits A., Voogt J. (2019) Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hicks T. (2013) Crafting digital writing: Composing texts across media and genres. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kress G. R. (2003) Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kucirkova N., Wells Rowe D., Oliver L., Piestrzynski L. E. (2019) Systematic review of young children’s writing on screen: What do we know and what do we need to know. Literacy, 53(4), 216–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lankshear C., Knobel M. (2011) New literacies. McGraw-Hill Education. (UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Marich H. (2016) Twitter in the elementary classroom: A teacher’s journey. Language Arts, 94(1), 67.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. National Council of Teachers of English (2018) Understanding and teaching writing: Guiding principles. https://ncte.org/statement/teachingcomposition/.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. National Writing Project DeVoss D., Eidman-Aadahl E., Hicks T. (2010) Because digital writing matters: Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Noble S. U. (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Perl S. (1979) The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(4), 317–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Purcell K., Buchanan J., Friedrich L. (2013) The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing is taught in schools. Pew Research Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner K. H. (2009) Flipping the switch: Code-switching from text speak to standard English. English Journal, 98(5), 60–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Turner K. H., Abrams S. S., Katie E., Donovan M. J. (2014) Demystifying digitalk: The what and why of the language teens use in digital writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 157–93.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/la202131332
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/la202131332
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error