Pedagogies of Closeness: Humanizing Small-Group Comprehension Instruction

References

1. Ahmed S. (2004) The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson R., Pearson P. D. (1984) A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. InPearson P. D., Barr R., Kamil M. L., Mosenthal P. B.(Eds.)Handbook of reading research. 255–92. Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bartolomé L. I. (1994) Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173–94. 10.17763/haer.64.2.58q5m5744t325730.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bishop R. S. (1997) Selecting literature for a multicultural curriculum. InHarris V. J.(Ed.) Using multiethnic literature in the K–8 classrooms. 1–19. Christopher-Gordon.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burciaga R., Kohli R. (2018) Disrupting whitestream measures of quality teaching: The community cultural wealth of teachers of color. Multicultural Perspectives, 20(1), 5–12. 10.1080/15210960.2017.1400915.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coleman D., Pimentel S. (2012) Revised publishers’ criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Literacy, grades 3–12. www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dutro E. (2019) The vulnerable heart of literacy: Centering trauma as powerful pedagogy. Teachers College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eppley K. (2019) Close reading: What is reading for?. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(3), 338–55. 10.1080/03626784.2019.1631701.
   [Google Scholar]
9. España C., Herrera L. Y. (2020) En comunidad: Lessons for centering the voices and experiences of bilingual Latinx students. Heinemann.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ferguson D. E. ((2013/2014)) Martin Luther King Jr. and the Common Core: A critical reading of close reading. Rethinking Schools, 28(2), www.rethinkingschools.org/articles/martin-luther-king-jr-and-the-common-core.
    [Google Scholar]
11. García O., Li W. (2014) Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765.
    [Google Scholar]
12. González N., Moll L. C., Amanti C.(Eds.) 2005) Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Handsfield L. J., Valente P. (2016) Momentos de cambio: Cultivating bilingual students’ epistemic privilege through memoir and testimonio. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 18(3), 138–58. 10.18251/ijme.v18i3.1200.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Handsfield L. J., Valente P. M., André A. (2016) April, Making meaning, making selves: Constructing social and academic identities and text interpretations during comprehension instruction. [Conference roundtable presentation]. American Educational Research Association 2016 Annual Meeting. Washington D.C., United States.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hargreaves A. (1998) The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–54. 10.1016/S0742‑051X(98)00025‑0.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hikida M., Taylor L. A. (2020) “As the test collapses in”: Teaching and learning amid high-stakes testing in two urban elementary classrooms. Urban Education. 10.1177/0042085920902263.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lehman C., Roberts K. (2014) Falling in love with close reading: Lessons for analyzing texts—and life. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Love B. L. (2019) We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Muhammad G. E., Haddix M. (2016) Centering Black girls’ literacies: A review of literature on the multiple ways of knowing of Black girls. English Education, 48(4), 299–336.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Newkirk T. (2012) The art of slow reading: Six time-honored practices for engagement. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pacheco M. B., David S., Jiménez R. T. (2015) Translating pedagogies: Leveraging students’ heritage languages in the literacy classroom. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(1), 49–63.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pearson P. D., Cervetti G. (2015) Fifty years of reading comprehension theory and practice. InPearson P. D., Hiebert E.(Eds.)Research-based practices for teaching Common Core literacy. 1–24. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rosenblatt L. M. (2004) The transactional theory of reading and writing. InRuddell R. B., Unrau N. J.(Eds.)Theoretical models and processes of reading. (5th ed.) 1363–1398. International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Santori D., Belfatti M. (2017) Do text-dependent questions need to be teacher dependent? Close reading from another angle. The Reading Teacher, 70(6), 649–657. 10.1002/trtr.1555.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Shanahan T.(n.d.). Common Core: Close reading. Scholastic Teacher. www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/common-core-close-reading-0/.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Thomas P. (2018) What literacy, and for whom, why?. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 33(2), 4–7. 10.9707/2168‑149X.2193.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Upadhyay R. (2005) Hard at work. InHarvey S., Goudvis A.(Eds.)Comprehension toolkit, source book of short text. 84–85. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Urrieta L. (2010) Working from within: Chicana and Chicano activist educators in whitestream schools. University of Arizona Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Valenzuela A. (1999) Subtractive schooling: U.S–Mexican youth and the politics of caring. SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Welsch J. G., Powell J. J., Robnolt V. J. (2019) Getting to the core of close reading: What do we really know and what remains to be seen?. Reading Psychology, 40(1), 95–116. 10.1080/02702711.2019.1571544.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wender E. (2017) Making a case for emotion in the Common Core understanding of close reading. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 32(1), 19–33.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Winkler P. (2005) Big talkers. InHarvey S., Goudvis A.(Eds.)Comprehension toolkit, source book of short text. 58–61. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Zavarzadeh M. (1992) Theory as resistance. InKecht M.(Ed.) Pedagogy is politics: Literary theory and critical teaching. 25–47. University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zoch M. (2017) “It’s important for them to know who they are”: Teachers’ efforts to sustain students’ cultural competence in an age of high-stakes testing. Urban Education, 52(5), 610–36. 10.1177/0042085915618716.
    [Google Scholar]