Skip to content
2018
Volume 97, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0360-9170
  • E-ISSN: 1943-2402

Abstract

Interwoven histories of education law, reading, and special education research together expose failures to improve reading achievement and diminish racial disproportionality, under Response to Intervention.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.58680/la201930339
2019-11-01
2023-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams M. J (1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson R. C.Hiebert E. H.Scott J. A.Wilkinson,I. I. A. G (1985) Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4, 389–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Artiles A. J (2013) Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Review, 10(2, 329–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Artiles A. J.Kozleski E. B.Trent S. C.Osher D.Ortiz A. (2010) Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3, 279–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Artiles A. JTrent S. C.Palmer J. D. (2004) Culturally diverse students in special education: Legacies and prospects. In InBanks J. A.Banks C. A.M. Eds Handbook of research on multicultural education. (2nd ed.) 716–735. San Francisco, CA, JosseyBass.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Au K. H (1980) Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11, 91–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bond G. LDykstra R. (1967) The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carnine D (2003) IDEA: Focusing on improving results for children with disabilities. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Education Reform of the House of Representatives, US Congress Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clay M (1970) Reading: The patterning of complex behavior. Auckland, New Zealand, Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cramer L (2015) Inequities of intervention amongculturally and linguistically diverse students. Urban Education, 12(1, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. InCramer S. CEllis W.Eds 1996) Learning disabil¬ities. Lifelong issues. Baltimore, MD, Paul J. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. InDelgado R.Stefanic J.Eds 2000) Critical race theory: The cutting edge. (2nd ed.) Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DeLissovoy N (2015) Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY, Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DiAngelo R (2018) White fragility. New York, NY, Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. InDonovan M. SCross C. T.Eds National Resource Center (NRC) 2002) Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC, National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunn L. M (1968) Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children. 35(1, 5–22. doi.org/10.1177/001440296803500101.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975(EAHCA), 20USC. 1400 Nov, 29 1975) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=89&page=773.
  18. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), 20 USC 2701 et seq April, 11 1965) Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/nonpublic/eseareauth.pdf.
  19. Ellis WCramer S. C. (1995) Learning disabilities:A national responsibility. Report of the Summit on Learning Disabilities (Washington, DC, September 20-21, 1994). New York, NY, National Center for Learning Disabilities.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fountas I. CPinnell G. S.Literacy: Elevating teacher expertise. [Website]. https://www.fountasandpinnell.com.
  21. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York,NY, Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuchs L. SFuchs D. (1998) Treatment validity:A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(4, 204–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuchs DFuchs L. S. (2006) Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs DFuchs L. S.Compton D. L.Bouton B.Caffrey E.Hill L. (2007) Dynamic assessment as responsiveness-to-intervention: A scripted protocol to identify young at-risk readers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5, 58–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gay R (2014) Bad feminist: Essays. New York, NY, Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gersten R (2016) Commentary: The tyranny of time and the reality principle. In InFoorman B.Ed Challenges to implementing effective reading intervention in schools New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 113–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gersten RDimino J. A. (2006) RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1, 99–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Goodman K. SGoodman Y. M. (1981) A comprehension-centered whole language curriculum (Occasional Paper No. 1). Tucson, AZ, University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gould S. J (1996) The mismeasure of man. New York,NY, W. W.Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Green E. L (2019) Mar, 8. DeVos illegally delayed special education rule, judge says. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/08/us/politics/betsy-devos-special-education.html.
  31. Heath S. B (1983) Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. InHeller K. AHoltzman W. H.Messick S.Eds National Research Council (NRC) 1982) Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Horowitz S. HRawe J.Whittaker M. C. (2017) The state of learning disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. New York, NY, National Center for Learning Disabilities.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hosp J. LReschly D. J. (2003) Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences. The Journal of Special Education, 37(2, 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Illinois State Board of Education (2008) Illinois state response to intervention (RTI) plan 2008. Retrieved from https://www.isbe.net/Documents/rti_state_plan.pdf.
  36. Illinois State Board of Education (2016) ISBE fiscal year 2017 proposed budget. Retrieved from: https://www.isbe.net/Documents/FY17-budget-book.pdf.
  37. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), 20 USC Ch.33 1400 et seq Dec, 3 2004) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=118&page=2647.
  38. Jenkins J. RO’Connor R. E. (2002) Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In InBradley R.Danielson L.Hallahan D. P.Eds Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. 99–150. Mawah, NJ, Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnston P. H. (2011) Response to intervention in literacy, problems and possibilities. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4, 511–534.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. King J (2016) Fact sheet: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. US Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/…/dcl-factsheet-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
  41. Lhamon C. E (2016) Dear Colleague letter: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. Washington, DC, US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201612-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
  42. Lyons G. R (1996) The state of research. In InCramer S. C.Ellis W.Eds Learning disabilities: Lifelong issues. 3–64. Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. National Center of Education Statistic (2004) Digest of educational statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/current_tables.asp.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. National Center for Education Statistics (2016) Table 204.50. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_204.50.asp.
  45. National Center on Intensive Intervention July 2018) Measures of academic progress (MAP) for primary grades. Retrieved from https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/chart/academic-screening.
  46. National Reading Panel (2000) Report of the NationalReading Panel. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 USC 70 6301 et seq Jan, 8 2002) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=115&page=1425.
  48. No Child Left Behind Act Law and Legal Definition (n.d.) Retrieved from https://definitions.uslegal.com/n/no-child-left-behind-act/.
  49. O’Connor C.Fernandez S. D. (2006) Race, class, and disproportionality: Reevaluating the relationship between poverty and special education placement. Educational Researcher, 35(6, 6–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shifrer DMueller C.Callahan R. (2011) Dispro-portionality and learning disabilities: Parsing apart race, socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3, 246–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith F (1973) Psycholinguistics and reading. Boston, MA, Thomson Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Snow C. EBurns M. S.Griffin P.Eds InNational Research Council (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. InSokal M. Ed 1987) Psychological testing and American society, 1890-1930. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. US Department of Education (2002) The facts: Reading achievement. No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/factsheet.html.
  55. US Department of Education (2006) Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/building-the-legacy-idea-2004/.
  56. US Department of Education (2007) Questions and answers on response to intervention (RTI) and early intervening services (EIS). Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/07-0021.RTI_.pdf.
  57. US Department of Education (2008a) Memo OSEP 08-09. Coordinated Early Intervening Services Guidance. Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/osep-memo-08-09-coordinated-early-intervening-services/.
  58. US Department of Education (2008b) Knudsen memo¬randum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/ceis_pg2.html.
  59. US Department of Education (2008c) New race and ethnicity guidance for the collection of federal education data. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/guid/raceethnicity/index.html.
  60. US Department of Education (2009) Implementing RTI using Title I, Title III and CEIS funds [PowerPoint presentation]. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/rti.html.
  61. US Department of Education (2016) Fact sheet: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
  62. US Department of Education. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities. 81 Fed. Reg. 92376 Dec, 19 2016) 34 CFR 300 Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/19/-2016-30190-/assistance-to-states-for-the-education-of-children-with-disabilities-preschool-grants-for-children.
  63. US Department of Education. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities. 83 Fed. Reg. 8396 July, 3 2018) 34 CFR 300 Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/03/2018-14374/assistance-to-states-for-the-education-of-children-with-disabilities-preschool-grants-for-children.
  64. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2002) A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC, author.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2005) Justesen memo¬randum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/letters/2005-2/osep0509privsch2q2005.pdf.
  66. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2011) Musgrove memorandum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/osep11-07rtimemo.pdf.
  67. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services July, 11 2017) Title 34: FR 300.8. Retrieved from https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=1&SID=5388bbf4849a2d61cefef5d2b2959af3&h=L&mc=true&n=pt34.2.300&r=PART&ty=HTML#se34.2.300_18.
  68. US Department of Education Title I—Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged 84 Fed. Reg. 31660 July, 1 2019) Title 34:CFR 200, 299. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg1.html.
  69. Wallace C (1994) Juicy [Recorded by Wallace]. On Ready to die [MP3]. New York, NY, Bad Boy Records. 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Willis A. I (2008) Reading comprehension research and testing in the US: Undercurrents of race, class, and power in the struggle for meaning. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Willis A. I (2018) Re-positioning race in English Language Arts research. In InLapp D.Fisher D.Eds Handbook of rZesearch on teaching the English Language Arts. (4th ed.) 36–57. New York, NY, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Willis A. IHarris V. J. (1997) Expanding the boundaries: A reaction to the first grade reading atudies. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(4, 439–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Winzer M. A (2007) Confronting difference: An excursion through the history of special education. In InFlorian L.Ed The SAGE handbook of special education. 21–33. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Zigler EStyfco S. J. (2010) The hidden history of Head Start. New York, NY, Oxford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.58680/la201930339
Loading
/content/journals/10.58680/la201930339
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error