Research & Policy

References

1. Adams M. J (1990) Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson R. C.Hiebert E. H.Scott J. A.Wilkinson,I. I. A. G (1985) Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4, 389–396.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Artiles A. J (2013) Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Review, 10(2, 329–347.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Artiles A. J.Kozleski E. B.Trent S. C.Osher D.Ortiz A. (2010) Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3, 279–299.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Artiles A. JTrent S. C.Palmer J. D. (2004) Culturally diverse students in special education: Legacies and prospects. In InBanks J. A.Banks C. A.M. Eds Handbook of research on multicultural education. (2nd ed.) 716–735. San Francisco, CA, JosseyBass.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Au K. H (1980) Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11, 91–115.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bond G. LDykstra R. (1967) The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–142.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carnine D (2003) IDEA: Focusing on improving results for children with disabilities. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Education Reform of the House of Representatives, US Congress Washington, DC.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Clay M (1970) Reading: The patterning of complex behavior. Auckland, New Zealand, Heinemann.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cramer L (2015) Inequities of intervention amongculturally and linguistically diverse students. Urban Education, 12(1, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
11. InCramer S. CEllis W.Eds 1996) Learning disabil¬ities. Lifelong issues. Baltimore, MD, Paul J. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
12. InDelgado R.Stefanic J.Eds 2000) Critical race theory: The cutting edge. (2nd ed.) Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DeLissovoy N (2015) Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY, Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DiAngelo R (2018) White fragility. New York, NY, Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. InDonovan M. SCross C. T.Eds National Resource Center (NRC) 2002) Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC, National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dunn L. M (1968) Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children. 35(1, 5–22. doi.org/10.1177/001440296803500101.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975(EAHCA), 20USC. 1400 Nov, 29 1975) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=89&page=773.
18. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), 20 USC 2701 et seq April, 11 1965) Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/nonpublic/eseareauth.pdf.
19. Ellis WCramer S. C. (1995) Learning disabilities:A national responsibility. Report of the Summit on Learning Disabilities (Washington, DC, September 20-21, 1994). New York, NY, National Center for Learning Disabilities.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fountas I. CPinnell G. S.Literacy: Elevating teacher expertise. [Website]. https://www.fountasandpinnell.com.
21. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York,NY, Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fuchs L. SFuchs D. (1998) Treatment validity:A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(4, 204–219.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fuchs DFuchs L. S. (2006) Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fuchs DFuchs L. S.Compton D. L.Bouton B.Caffrey E.Hill L. (2007) Dynamic assessment as responsiveness-to-intervention: A scripted protocol to identify young at-risk readers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5, 58–63.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gay R (2014) Bad feminist: Essays. New York, NY, Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gersten R (2016) Commentary: The tyranny of time and the reality principle. In InFoorman B.Ed Challenges to implementing effective reading intervention in schools New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 113–116.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gersten RDimino J. A. (2006) RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1, 99–108.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Goodman K. SGoodman Y. M. (1981) A comprehension-centered whole language curriculum (Occasional Paper No. 1). Tucson, AZ, University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gould S. J (1996) The mismeasure of man. New York,NY, W. W.Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Green E. L (2019) Mar, 8. DeVos illegally delayed special education rule, judge says. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/08/us/politics/betsy-devos-special-education.html.
31. Heath S. B (1983) Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. InHeller K. AHoltzman W. H.Messick S.Eds National Research Council (NRC) 1982) Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Horowitz S. HRawe J.Whittaker M. C. (2017) The state of learning disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. New York, NY, National Center for Learning Disabilities.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hosp J. LReschly D. J. (2003) Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences. The Journal of Special Education, 37(2, 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Illinois State Board of Education (2008) Illinois state response to intervention (RTI) plan 2008. Retrieved from https://www.isbe.net/Documents/rti_state_plan.pdf.
36. Illinois State Board of Education (2016) ISBE fiscal year 2017 proposed budget. Retrieved from: https://www.isbe.net/Documents/FY17-budget-book.pdf.
37. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), 20 USC Ch.33 1400 et seq Dec, 3 2004) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=118&page=2647.
38. Jenkins J. RO’Connor R. E. (2002) Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In InBradley R.Danielson L.Hallahan D. P.Eds Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. 99–150. Mawah, NJ, Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Johnston P. H. (2011) Response to intervention in literacy, problems and possibilities. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4, 511–534.
    [Google Scholar]
40. King J (2016) Fact sheet: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. US Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/…/dcl-factsheet-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
41. Lhamon C. E (2016) Dear Colleague letter: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. Washington, DC, US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201612-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
42. Lyons G. R (1996) The state of research. In InCramer S. C.Ellis W.Eds Learning disabilities: Lifelong issues. 3–64. Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes.
    [Google Scholar]
43. National Center of Education Statistic (2004) Digest of educational statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/current_tables.asp.
    [Google Scholar]
44. National Center for Education Statistics (2016) Table 204.50. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_204.50.asp.
45. National Center on Intensive Intervention July 2018) Measures of academic progress (MAP) for primary grades. Retrieved from https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/chart/academic-screening.
46. National Reading Panel (2000) Report of the NationalReading Panel. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
47. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 USC 70 6301 et seq Jan, 8 2002) Retrieved from https://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=115&page=1425.
48. No Child Left Behind Act Law and Legal Definition (n.d.) Retrieved from https://definitions.uslegal.com/n/no-child-left-behind-act/.
49. O’Connor C.Fernandez S. D. (2006) Race, class, and disproportionality: Reevaluating the relationship between poverty and special education placement. Educational Researcher, 35(6, 6–11.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Shifrer DMueller C.Callahan R. (2011) Dispro-portionality and learning disabilities: Parsing apart race, socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3, 246–257.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smith F (1973) Psycholinguistics and reading. Boston, MA, Thomson Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Snow C. EBurns M. S.Griffin P.Eds InNational Research Council (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. InSokal M. Ed 1987) Psychological testing and American society, 1890-1930. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. US Department of Education (2002) The facts: Reading achievement. No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/factsheet.html.
55. US Department of Education (2006) Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/building-the-legacy-idea-2004/.
56. US Department of Education (2007) Questions and answers on response to intervention (RTI) and early intervening services (EIS). Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/07-0021.RTI_.pdf.
57. US Department of Education (2008a) Memo OSEP 08-09. Coordinated Early Intervening Services Guidance. Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/idea-files/osep-memo-08-09-coordinated-early-intervening-services/.
58. US Department of Education (2008b) Knudsen memo¬randum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/ceis_pg2.html.
59. US Department of Education (2008c) New race and ethnicity guidance for the collection of federal education data. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/guid/raceethnicity/index.html.
60. US Department of Education (2009) Implementing RTI using Title I, Title III and CEIS funds [PowerPoint presentation]. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/rti.html.
61. US Department of Education (2016) Fact sheet: Preventing racial discrimination in special education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-factsheet-racedisc-special-education.pdf.
62. US Department of Education. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities. 81 Fed. Reg. 92376 Dec, 19 2016) 34 CFR 300 Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/19/-2016-30190-/assistance-to-states-for-the-education-of-children-with-disabilities-preschool-grants-for-children.
63. US Department of Education. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities. 83 Fed. Reg. 8396 July, 3 2018) 34 CFR 300 Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/03/2018-14374/assistance-to-states-for-the-education-of-children-with-disabilities-preschool-grants-for-children.
64. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2002) A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC, author.
    [Google Scholar]
65. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2005) Justesen memo¬randum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/letters/2005-2/osep0509privsch2q2005.pdf.
66. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (2011) Musgrove memorandum. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/osep11-07rtimemo.pdf.
67. US Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services July, 11 2017) Title 34: FR 300.8. Retrieved from https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=1&SID=5388bbf4849a2d61cefef5d2b2959af3&h=L&mc=true&n=pt34.2.300&r=PART&ty=HTML#se34.2.300_18.
68. US Department of Education Title I—Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged 84 Fed. Reg. 31660 July, 1 2019) Title 34:CFR 200, 299. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg1.html.
69. Wallace C (1994) Juicy [Recorded by Wallace]. On Ready to die [MP3]. New York, NY, Bad Boy Records. 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Willis A. I (2008) Reading comprehension research and testing in the US: Undercurrents of race, class, and power in the struggle for meaning. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Willis A. I (2018) Re-positioning race in English Language Arts research. In InLapp D.Fisher D.Eds Handbook of rZesearch on teaching the English Language Arts. (4th ed.) 36–57. New York, NY, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Willis A. IHarris V. J. (1997) Expanding the boundaries: A reaction to the first grade reading atudies. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(4, 439–445.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Winzer M. A (2007) Confronting difference: An excursion through the history of special education. In InFlorian L.Ed The SAGE handbook of special education. 21–33. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Zigler EStyfco S. J. (2010) The hidden history of Head Start. New York, NY, Oxford Press.
    [Google Scholar]