f Beyond Grade Norming: Using Portfolio Assessment Groups as a Professional Development Tool for Contingent Faculty

References

1. Akerlind Gerlese S. “Growing and Developing as a University Teacher—Variation in Meaning.” Studies in Higher Education, vol.28, no.4 2003, pp.375–90.
   [Google Scholar]
2. American Association of University Professors“Data Snapshot: Contingent Faculty in US Higher Ed.” American Association of University Professors 2018, href:https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/10112018%20Data%20Snapshot%20Tenure.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Broad Bob. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing. Utah State UP 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Durst Russel K., et al. “Portfolio Negotiations: Acts in Speech.” New Directions in Portfolio Assessment, edited byBlack Laurel, et al., Boynton/Cook 1994, pp.286–300.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Elbow Peter, Pat Belanoff. “Portfolios as a Substitute for Proficiency Examinations” [Staffroom Interchange]College Composition and Communication, vol.37, no.3, Oct 1986, pp.336–39.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Erklenz-Watts Michelle, et al. “An Alternative Professional Development Program: Lessons Learned.” College Teaching, vol.54, no.3 2006, pp.275–80EBSCO-host, doi:10.3200/CTCH.54.3.275–280.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hamp-Lyons Liz, William Condon. “Questioning Assumptions about Portfolio-Based Assessment.” College Composition and Communication, vol.44, no.2 1993, pp.176–90EBSCOhost, doi:10.2307/358837.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Owens Robert G. Organizational Behavior in Education: Instructional Leadership and School Reform, 7th Allyn & Bacon 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Palmer Parker J. “The Heart of a Teacher: Identity and Integrity in Teaching.” The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century, edited byPescosolido Bernice A., Aminzade Ronald, Sage 1999, pp.504–06.
   [Google Scholar]