f Academic Freedom, Contingency, and the Place of Professional Learning Communities

References

1. Allan Elizabeth G., Dana Lynn Driscoll. “The Three-Fold Benefit of Reflective Writing: Improving Program Assessment, Student Learning, and Faculty Professional Development.” Assessing Writing, vol.21 2014, pp.37–55.
   [Google Scholar]
2. American Association of University Professors. 1915 Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anson Chris M., Richard Jewell. “Shadows of the Mountain.” Schell and Stock, pp.47–75.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bentley Erinn. Professional Learning Communities and First-Year Composition Instructors 2011 Western Michigan University, dissertation. scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/323.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bilia Angela, et al. “Forum on Identity.” College English, vol.73, no.4 2011, pp.379–95.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clausen Jan, Eva-Maria Swidler. “Academic Freedom from Below: Toward an Adjunct-Centered Struggle.” Journal of Academic Freedom, vol.4 2013, pp.1–14. aaup.org/reports-publications/journal-academic-freedom.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Colby Richard, Colby Rebekah Shulz. “Real Faculty but Not: The Full-Time, Non-Tenure-Track Position as Contingent Labor.” Seth Kahn et al., pp.57–70.
8. Dewey John. “Academic Freedom.” Educational Review, vol.23Jan 1902, pp.1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Donhardt Tracy, Sarah Layden. “Adjuncts Fostering Change: Improving Adjunct Working Conditions by Forming an Associate Faculty Coalition (AFC).” Kahn et al.pp.183–97.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Finkin Matthew W., Robert C. Post. For the Common Good: Principles of American Academic Freedom. Yale UP 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gladstein Jill, Brandon Fralix. The National Census of Writing 2013 writingcensus.swarthmore.edu.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hendricks Bill. “Working Alone Together: Labor Agency and Professional Exchange in the Teaching of Composition.” Pedagogy, vol.9, no.2, Spr. 2009, pp.235–60.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kahn Seth. “Bad Idea about Writing: Anybody Can Teach It.” Inside Higher Ed. 07Aug 2017, insidehighered.com/views/2017/08/07/colleges-should-hire-writing-instructors-right-experience-and-expertise-and-give.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kahn Seth, et al. “Introduction: Paths towards Solidarity” Kahn et al., pp.3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kahn Seth. Contingency, Exploitation, and Solidarity: Labor and Action in English Composition. The WAC Clearinghouse/UP Colorado 2017, wac.colo state.edu/books/contingency.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Marshall Margaret J. Contesting Cultural Rhetorics: Public Discourse and Education, 1890–1900. U of Michigan P 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Matthews Jessica. “Re: Follow up on CWPA PLC Panel.” Received byTeagarden Alexis, 11Sept. 2017.
18. Matthews Jessica, et al. “Learning Communities: Leveraging External Funding for Faculty-Driven Professional Development.” Solving Problems Together: Agency and Advocacy in an Age of Austerity, Council of Writing Program Administrators Conference, 21 July 2017, U Tennessee Conference Center, Knoxville, TN. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Micciche Laura R. “For Slow Agency.” Writing Program Administration, vol.35, no.1 2011, pp.73–90. wpacouncil.org/archives/35n1/35n1micciche.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Murphy Michael. “New Faculty for a New University: Toward a Full-Time Teaching Intensive Faculty Track in Composition.” College Composition and Communication, vol.52, no.1 2000, pp.14–42.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Murphy Michael. “Head to Head with EDX?: Toward a New Rhetoric for Academic Labor.” Kahn et al., pp.71–89.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nagelhout Ed. “Faculty Development as Working Condition.” Forum, vol.11, no.1, Fall 2007, pp.A14–16.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nelson Cary. No University Is an Island: Saving Academic Freedom. New York UP 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Penrose Ann M. “Professional Identity in a Contingent-Labor Profession: Expertise, Autonomy, Community in Composition Teaching.” WPA: Writing Program Administration, vol.35, no.2, Spring 2012, pp.108–26. http:wpacouncil.org/ archives/35n2/35n2penrose.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Popp Jacquelynn S., Susan R. Goldman. “Knowledge Building in Teacher Professional Learning Communities: Focus of Meeting Matters.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.59 2016, pp.347–59.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Russell David, et al. “From Learning Communities to Professional Communities: Negotiating Identities through Research-Based Bizcomm Program Redesign.” Risk and Reward, College Composition and Communication Conference19Mar 2015 Tampa Convention Center, Tampa, FL. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schell Eileen E., Patricia Lambert Stock. “Working Contingent Faculty in[to] Higher Education.” Schell and Stock, pp.1–46.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schell Eileen E., Patricia Lambert Stock. Moving a Mountain: Transforming the Role of Contingent Faculty in Composition Studies and Higher Education. NCTE 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Vescio Vicki, et al. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.24 2008, pp.80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Yancey Kathleen. “The Teaching Circle, the WPA, and Writing in the University.” Kitchen Cooks, Plate Twirlers, and Troubadours: Writing Program Administrators Tell Their Stories, edited byGeorge Diana, Boynton/Cook 1999, pp.129–77.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yoo Laura, et al. “Theory, Practice … Talk and Snacks: How One Faculty Professional Learning Community Discovered Action through Collaboration.” Writing Strategies for Action, College Composition and Communication Conference9Apr 2016 Hilton Americas, Houston, TX. Panel.
    [Google Scholar]